> >
> > That's good enough. :) Thanks
> >
> > Maybe _that_ will keep that ata code from over-riding
> > the bios to disable dma (or maybe the bios just wasn't
> > doing it's job right ;)
>
>
> This won't work.
What do you mean with this? The procedure that I described (barring
typos) do
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
> Jonathan Smith wrote:
> >
> > That's good enough. :) Thanks
> >
> > Maybe _that_ will keep that ata code from over-riding
> > the bios to disable dma (or maybe the bios just wasn't
> > doing it's job right ;)
>
> This won't work.
>
> Someone was having the
Jonathan Smith wrote:
>
> That's good enough. :) Thanks
>
> Maybe _that_ will keep that ata code from over-riding
> the bios to disable dma (or maybe the bios just wasn't
> doing it's job right ;)
This won't work.
Someone was having the same problem the other day, and
I suggested the sam
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Evans
writes:
: The first "ls" should create about 8000 new tun devices by first accessing
: them via stat(2), but there is some garbage collection, so the second "ls"
: may show that some of the devices have magically unappeared.
I just want to see the disk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I make a short patch to sharing IRQ between a PCIC and a PC Card when using
: PCI IRQ routing.
: #Does this patch help you?
Yes. It does. Thank you!
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curr
I make a short patch to sharing IRQ between a PCIC and a PC Card when using
PCI IRQ routing.
#Does this patch help you?
---
YAMAMOTO ShigeruInternet Initiative Japan Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Engineering Div.
Index: pcic.c
Do somebody works on it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
subscribe freebsd-current
=
My homepage: http://mojo.myftp.org
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in th
unsubscribe
Folks,
I have a new version of the patch for you to test. It's up:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_slab/mb_alloc-LATEST.diff
(same place as before).
The difference is that I have removed the HUGE src/sys sweep for #include's
and have removed the need to include before .
Th
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Two things have turned up:
>
> 1: make sure you rerun config. This should go without saying, but some
> people have been forgetting. You must rerun config(8) *EVERY* time that
> you do a 'cvs update' or 'cvsup' in checkout mode that touches any of the
> files in sys/conf/* (
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > 3. Provide an alternative to qsort() that takes an comparison function
> >that takes an additional function pointer arg (use this arg to avoid
> >the global in (1)).
>
> Actually, doing this would solve a number of similar prob
Two things have turned up:
1: make sure you rerun config. This should go without saying, but some
people have been forgetting. You must rerun config(8) *EVERY* time that
you do a 'cvs update' or 'cvsup' in checkout mode that touches any of the
files in sys/conf/* (like this commit did).
2: I b
I have checked in revision 1.99 to ffs_softdep.c which
builds on the change in revision 1.98 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The symptom being treated in 1.98 was to avoid freeing a
pagedep dependency if there was still a newdirblk dependency
referencing it. That change is correct and no longer prints
the w
At Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:45:03 + (UTC),
Michael Harnois wrote:
> Building the kernel without INET6 makes this error go away. cvsup as
> of about two hours ago.
Do you define WITNESS or not?
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // FreeBSD Proje
I was looking for thread-safe version of gethostbyname (), but I didn't
find it. Can someone tell me, does such a function exsist ?
Tomasz Paszkowski
--
"Existen dos productos importantes que salieron de Berkeley: LSD y UNIX.
No creemos que esto sea una coincidencia."
Salve,
Con DirectLine potrai riferirti ad un unico operatore per tutte le tue
chiamate urbane, interurbane, internazionali e verso cellulari a tariffe
MAI VISTE...
Segnalando il servizio ai tuoi amici, arriverai ad eliminare del tutto la
bolletta telefonica, e se gli amici sono tanti... potrai a
Salve,
Con DirectLine potrai riferirti ad un unico operatore per tutte le tue
chiamate urbane, interurbane, internazionali e verso cellulari a tariffe
MAI VISTE...
Segnalando il servizio ai tuoi amici, arriverai ad eliminare del tutto la
bolletta telefonica, e se gli amici sono tanti... potrai a
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:15:53 -0400
> Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yup, current KAME is based on 4.3-RELEASE which doesn't have
> mtx_lock() issue. It is my mistake during merging it into 5-CURRENT.
> The fix looks good to me. If there is no objection, I'll commit it.
bmi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 03:12:06AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:42:51 -0400
> > Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> bmilekic> Yes, I certainly didn't write that. I think it was KAME.
>
> Yup, current KAME is based on 4.3-RELEASE which doesn't have
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:42:51 -0400
> > Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> bmilekic> Yes, I certainly didn't write that. I think it was KAME.
>
> Yup, current KAME is based on 4.3-RELEASE which doesn't have
> mtx_lock() issue.
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:42:51 -0400
> Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bmilekic> Yes, I certainly didn't write that. I think it was KAME.
Yup, current KAME is based on 4.3-RELEASE which doesn't have
mtx_lock() issue. It is my mistake during merging it into 5-CURRENT.
The f
Yes, I certainly didn't write that. I think it was KAME.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> A recent change to the MFREE macro was made as noted below:
>
> /*
> * MFREE(struct mbuf *m, struct mbuf *n)
> * Free a single mbuf and associated external stor
A recent change to the MFREE macro was made as noted below:
/*
* MFREE(struct mbuf *m, struct mbuf *n)
* Free a single mbuf and associated external storage.
* Place the successor, if any, in n.
*
* we do need to check non-first mbuf for m_aux, since some of existing
* code does not call M
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:48:14AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > The reason I said "in the next week" is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
> > (not this upcoming one, but the one after), I should be flying off to
> > Yugoslavia (actually to London, and only then to Yugoslavia). I will be
> > gon
World broke?
-FW: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Deimos Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Snapshot Log
cc -nostdinc -O -pipe
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam/../../../contrib/libpam/libpam/include
-I/usr/src/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Bliz
nak writes:
>
>After CURRENT update I see this in /var/log/messages:
>
>>Jun 12 18:50:48 pyvo diskcheckd[204]: open /etc/diskcheckd.conf failure:
>>No such file or directory
>
>I saw this commit message:
>
>> revision 1.267
>> date: 2001/06/03 20:15:10;
After CURRENT update I see this in /var/log/messages:
>Jun 12 18:50:48 pyvo diskcheckd[204]: open /etc/diskcheckd.conf failure:
>No such file or directory
I saw this commit message:
> revision 1.267
> date: 2001/06/03 20:15:10; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +9 -1
> Add diskcheckd to /etc/
< said:
> Why not do something like the rpc code does? Check if threaded, if
> so cons up a thread specific key otherwise use a global.
The Standard does not appear to say whether qsort() is reentrant, but
I believe that it ought to be. fts() was clearly intended to be
reentrant. (I don't kno
* Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010613 11:51] wrote:
> < said:
>
> > How should we call this function?
> > (I'll implement this tomorrow.)
>
> I was would call it `qsort_with_arg' or something similar. There is a
> namespace issue here; reserves very little namespace for
> the implement
< said:
> How should we call this function?
> (I'll implement this tomorrow.)
I was would call it `qsort_with_arg' or something similar. There is a
namespace issue here; reserves very little namespace for
the implementation, so anything we add will have to be hidden from
strictly-compliant app
Building the kernel without INET6 makes this error go away. cvsup as
of about two hours ago.
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) mbuf free list lock @
../../kern/uipc_mbuf.c:582
first acquired @ ../../kern/uipc_mbuf.c:582
panic:recurse
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x45: pushl %
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:16:57AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > 3. Provide an alternative to qsort() that takes an comparison function
> >that takes an additional function pointer arg (use this arg to avoid
> >the global in (1)).
>
> Actually, doing this would solve a nu
< said:
> 3. Provide an alternative to qsort() that takes an comparison function
>that takes an additional function pointer arg (use this arg to avoid
>the global in (1)).
Actually, doing this would solve a number of similar problems, and it
doesn't look to be too difficult to do. I wou
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Should I commit the attached patch then?
I don't like changing the documented interface of fts_open() but all the
alternatives that I can think of aren't appealing:
1. Provide a glue function that converts what qsort expects to the
documented inter
Guys, We've been doing pretty well on the PR/Gnats front since
we started our little "Close a PR" drive, but now is not the time
to loose steam.
http://phk.freebsd.dk/Gnats/
We're at the same level of unclosed PR's as we were half a year
ago, down 500 from when we began the drive, but s
Should I commit the attached patch then?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:35:39PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > For those interested, here's the missing patch.
>
> Index: lib/libc/gen/fts.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/ft
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szilveszter Adam writes:
> : > Thanks, it works. I was confused by 'devfs' this time which not show ad0s5
> : > slice under /dev until it is actualy mounted.
> :
> : Yes, devfs really takes some getting used to in the begin
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:04:10, bde (Bruce Evans) wrote about "Re: Terminal line
>discipline is broken [sorta]":
>
> > This may be a bug in tcsh.
>
> Do you really think that shell should not modify signal handling policy
> which he obtained as
[Crawling out of hiding again]
-On [20010611 19:30], Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I agree, but just imagine that I have assumption that Peter already
>resolve this issue with Nick (since he do repo copy) and you'll find
>a reason to not be extra-cautious.
First lesson I learned
> The reason I said "in the next week" is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
> (not this upcoming one, but the one after), I should be flying off to
> Yugoslavia (actually to London, and only then to Yugoslavia). I will be
> gone for 3 weeks and seeing as how maintaining this huge diff is a real
41 matches
Mail list logo