I have seen these messages on my slow 266MHz dual Pentium II machine with
a kernel build with source from after Matt and Jake's commits. Is there
anyone interrested in it? It happened while doing a cvs -q update -PAd.
acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "PCPU KNOTE"
1st @ ../../../vm/uma_core
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Kyle Butt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be,
>> but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex:
>> [...]
>> Has anyone else experienced this problem?
>
>I'm seeing the exact same problem
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:15:14AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-03-26 12:00, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > > > Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-)
> > >
> > > You w
> > A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what
> > can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose
> > a random utility and delete it?
>
> I think that we really should move to using new loader(8) feature for
> loading kernels/modules split
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 07:44, John Hay wrote:
> A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what
> can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose
> a random utility and delete it?
I think that we really should move to using new loader(8) feature
A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what
can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose
a random utility and delete it?
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:38:38PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 6:36 AM +0100 3/26/02, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> >Currently rebuilding with latest sources, will look into
> >it after that.
>
> Whatever the problem had been, it looks like it was fixed
> between March 23 and today (the 26th).
===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl
Extracting config.h (with variable substitutions)
Extracting cflags (with variable substitutions)
Extracting writemain (with variable substitutions)
Extracting myconfig (with variable substitutions)
Args must match #! line at
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../../../../c
At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:40:10 -0700,
Kyle Butt wrote:
>
> At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:59:29 +0100,
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
> > before.
> >
> > Could you please try to boot -v and give me the ACPI timecounter
> > probe li
On 2002-03-26 12:00, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > > Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-)
> >
> > You will gain saint-like patience as a bonus..
> >
> > ;)
>
> Remind me again of the
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:43:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote:
> > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
> > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
> > following lock order rev
At 6:36 AM +0100 3/26/02, Mark Santcroos wrote:
>Currently rebuilding with latest sources, will look into
>it after that.
Whatever the problem had been, it looks like it was fixed
between March 23 and today (the 26th). I did a buildworld
as of 4pm or so, and vmware2 is up and running OK on the
m
Kyle Butt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be,
> but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex:
> [...]
> Has anyone else experienced this problem?
I'm seeing the exact same problem on, guess what...
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #162: Sat Mar 23 19:49:09 CE
Hello:
I'm using 4 stable and i'want to upgrade to current.
When I do make buildworld, I get the next error:
...
... libpam/modules/pam-ssh
make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.a Stop
Error code 2
1 error
Erro code 2
1 error
What can I do to fix it.
Thanks i
I've scanned the email list archive but I can't see any overview
or example/suggested ACPI interactions.
Is there a brief document somewhere which summarizes how to interact
with an ACPI enabled kernel? Which clarifies what to do with stub apm_
references in configs?
(upgrading from 4.5. So far
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>
> keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in
> keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though.
> keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should
> keramida> remember to update etc/mail/Makefile to
On 2002-03-26 15:02, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> keramida> Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in
> keramida> /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says
> keramida> "If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please
> keramida> update *t
keramida> Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in
keramida> /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says
keramida> "If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please
keramida> update *that* file too." Can we put something like this in
kerami
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020326 14:43] wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote:
> > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
> > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
> > following lock order reversal
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote:
> The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
> down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
> following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight:
>
> Mar 24 07:31:44 gohan17 kernel: lock
On 2002-03-26 12:51, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in
> keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though.
> keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should
> keramida> remember to update et
keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in
keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though.
keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should
keramida> remember to update etc/mail/Makefile too.
Yes, I really hope the /etc/rc.d wo
On 2002-03-25 23:58, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>
> FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-STABLE
> FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-CURRENT
I don't have STABLE around, so I've only looked at smstart-CURRENT.
It's nice, if you ask me.
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-)
>
> You will gain saint-like patience as a bonus..
>
> ;)
Remind me again of the value of saint-like patience, in the larger
scheme of t
At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:59:29 +0100,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>
> This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
> before.
>
> Could you please try to boot -v and give me the ACPI timecounter
> probe lines ? (about ten lines which talk about it being GOOD or
> BAD).
>
Her
On 25 Mar 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks.
>
> Here's an updated (but untested) version.
The patch applies cleanly, and pam_ldap builds. Howvever, every service I
try to authenticate wit
On Monday, 25th March 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
>I think I have an identical problem involving a Linksys ethernet card
>using if_dc. I have to force it to negotiate 10mbps, since it fails to
>negotiate anything higher with my 10/100 switch. No idea why at all.
>
>dc0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem
>
On Monday, 25th March 2002, "Ilmar S. Habibulin" wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Stephen McKay wrote:
>
>> What sort of card do you have? The output of dmesg would help. Have you
>> tried 4.5 on this machine?
>I have some noname nic with Intel 21143 chip. dmesg attached. I'm using
>only trustedbsd
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
>> before.
>
>I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter
>was busted. I dunno if it
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> Either would work.
>
> I have an Alpha Multia-166 that I use to play with -current on. As it
> has a TGA card, it's running via serial console. This machine feels
> like the equivalent of, say, a 50MHz 486.
>
> Each day, I try to
Either would work.
I have an Alpha Multia-166 that I use to play with -current on. As it
has a TGA card, it's running via serial console. This machine feels
like the equivalent of, say, a 50MHz 486.
Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-)
I'd grab one with a norm
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:14:57PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Hi again,
> > I don't have a debug kernel, those are the boot floppies downloaded from
> > current.freebsd.org. If it helps, the snapshot floppies from 11th of
> > March work, every floppy made after that date fails with the same erro
I too have experienced this problem with -current. I'm running on a Thinkpad A21p,
but with a fairly out-of-date build (September 1, 2001).
This happens, I believe. because the kernel thinks the processor is running at one
speed and then that speed changes to reflect different power management
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
> before.
I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter
was busted. I dunno if it is possible to sanity check the time
counter before using
This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
before.
Could you please try to boot -v and give me the ACPI timecounter
probe lines ? (about ten lines which talk about it being GOOD or
BAD).
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kyle Butt writes:
>My system clock is r
My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be,
but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex:
bash-2.04$ date ; sleep 5 ; date
Tue Mar 26 01:48:45 MST 2002
Tue Mar 26 01:48:55 MST 2002
bash-2.04$
Has anyone else experienced this problem? I'm running X4.2.0 but
not from the ports. (I upg
i'd rather fix the change so that ether is not mandatory.
Let me think/experiment a bit about it.
cheers
luigi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:16:49AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> Hello Luigi,
>
> On 05:20-0800, Mar 24, 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Do you have a suggestion f
37 matches
Mail list logo
