Re: is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-26 Thread Luigi Rizzo
i'd rather fix the change so that ether is not mandatory. Let me think/experiment a bit about it. cheers luigi On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:16:49AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello Luigi, On 05:20-0800, Mar 24, 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Do you have a suggestion for an

Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Kyle Butt
My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be, but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex: bash-2.04$ date ; sleep 5 ; date Tue Mar 26 01:48:45 MST 2002 Tue Mar 26 01:48:55 MST 2002 bash-2.04$ Has anyone else experienced this problem? I'm running X4.2.0 but not from the ports. (I

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that before. Could you please try to boot -v and give me the ACPI timecounter probe lines ? (about ten lines which talk about it being GOOD or BAD). Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kyle Butt writes: My system clock is

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that before. I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter was busted. I dunno if it is possible to sanity check the time counter before using

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Jon
I too have experienced this problem with -current. I'm running on a Thinkpad A21p, but with a fairly out-of-date build (September 1, 2001). This happens, I believe. because the kernel thinks the processor is running at one speed and then that speed changes to reflect different power

Re: BTX halted

2002-03-26 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:14:57PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: Hi again, I don't have a debug kernel, those are the boot floppies downloaded from current.freebsd.org. If it helps, the snapshot floppies from 11th of March work, every floppy made after that date fails with the same error.

Re: Alpha Build

2002-03-26 Thread Michael Lucas
Either would work. I have an Alpha Multia-166 that I use to play with -current on. As it has a TGA card, it's running via serial console. This machine feels like the equivalent of, say, a 50MHz 486. Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-) I'd grab one with a

Re: Alpha Build

2002-03-26 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: Either would work. I have an Alpha Multia-166 that I use to play with -current on. As it has a TGA card, it's running via serial console. This machine feels like the equivalent of, say, a 50MHz 486. Each day, I try to build

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Malone writes: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that before. I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter was busted. I dunno if it is

Re: if_dc broken in -current

2002-03-26 Thread Stephen McKay
On Monday, 25th March 2002, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Stephen McKay wrote: What sort of card do you have? The output of dmesg would help. Have you tried 4.5 on this machine? I have some noname nic with Intel 21143 chip. dmesg attached. I'm using only trustedbsd_mac

Re: if_dc broken in -current

2002-03-26 Thread Stephen McKay
On Monday, 25th March 2002, Robert Watson wrote: I think I have an identical problem involving a Linksys ethernet card using if_dc. I have to force it to negotiate 10mbps, since it fails to negotiate anything higher with my 10/100 switch. No idea why at all. dc0: LC82C115 PNIC II 10/100BaseTX

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-26 Thread Joe Clarke
On 25 Mar 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Joe Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. Here's an updated (but untested) version. The patch applies cleanly, and pam_ldap builds. Howvever, every service I try to authenticate with it

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Kyle Butt
At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:59:29 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that before. Could you please try to boot -v and give me the ACPI timecounter probe lines ? (about ten lines which talk about it being GOOD or BAD). snip Here

Re: Alpha Build

2002-03-26 Thread Terry Lambert
Wilko Bulte wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-) You will gain saint-like patience as a bonus.. ;) Remind me again of the value of saint-like patience, in the larger scheme of

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020324 14:26] wrote: The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight: Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel:

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020326 14:43] wrote: * Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020324 14:26] wrote: The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the following lock order reversal in

ACPI documentation?

2002-03-26 Thread George Michaelson
I've scanned the email list archive but I can't see any overview or example/suggested ACPI interactions. Is there a brief document somewhere which summarizes how to interact with an ACPI enabled kernel? Which clarifies what to do with stub apm_ references in configs? (upgrading from 4.5. So

buildworld error in pam-ssh

2002-03-26 Thread Luis Zuccolo
Hello: I'm using 4 stable and i'want to upgrade to current. When I do make buildworld, I get the next error: ... ...  libpam/modules/pam-ssh make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.a Stop Error code 2 1 error Erro code 2 1 error   What can I do to fix it. Thanks

Re: VMWare2 was broken in recent -current (seems OK now)

2002-03-26 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 6:36 AM +0100 3/26/02, Mark Santcroos wrote: Currently rebuilding with latest sources, will look into it after that. Whatever the problem had been, it looks like it was fixed between March 23 and today (the 26th). I did a buildworld as of 4pm or so, and vmware2 is up and running OK on the

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:43:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020324 14:26] wrote: The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the following lock order reversal in

Re: Alpha Build

2002-03-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-26 12:00, Terry Lambert wrote: Wilko Bulte wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-) You will gain saint-like patience as a bonus.. ;) Remind me again of the value of

Alpha cross build b0rked by Perl.

2002-03-26 Thread David O'Brien
=== gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl Extracting config.h (with variable substitutions) Extracting cflags (with variable substitutions) Extracting writemain (with variable substitutions) Extracting myconfig (with variable substitutions) Args must match #! line at

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kyle Butt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be, but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex: [...] Has anyone else experienced this problem? I'm seeing the exact same problem on, guess what... FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #162: Sat Mar 23 19:49:09 CET

Re: VMWare2 was broken in recent -current (seems OK now)

2002-03-26 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:38:38PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 6:36 AM +0100 3/26/02, Mark Santcroos wrote: Currently rebuilding with latest sources, will look into it after that. Whatever the problem had been, it looks like it was fixed between March 23 and today (the 26th). I did

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread keramida
On 2002-03-25 23:58, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-STABLE FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-CURRENT I don't have STABLE around, so I've only looked at smstart-CURRENT. It's nice, if you ask me.

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
keramida I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in keramida etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. keramida This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should keramida remember to update etc/mail/Makefile too. Yes, I really hope the /etc/rc.d work

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-26 12:51, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: keramida I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in keramida etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. keramida This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should keramida remember to update

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
keramida Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in keramida /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says keramida If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please keramida update *that* file too. Can we put something like this in keramida

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-26 15:02, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: keramida Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in keramida /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says keramida If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please keramida update *that*

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread ian j hart
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: keramida I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in keramida etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. keramida This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should keramida remember to update etc/mail/Makefile too.

fixit.flp full again

2002-03-26 Thread John Hay
A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose a random utility and delete it? John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: fixit.flp full again

2002-03-26 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 07:44, John Hay wrote: A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose a random utility and delete it? I think that we really should move to using new loader(8) feature

Re: fixit.flp full again

2002-03-26 Thread John Hay
A make release breaks because the fixit floppy is too big again. So what can we do to get it smaller? Anybody got any ideas or shall we just choose a random utility and delete it? I think that we really should move to using new loader(8) feature for loading kernels/modules split across

Re: Alpha Build

2002-03-26 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:15:14AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-03-26 12:00, Terry Lambert wrote: Wilko Bulte wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:56:39AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: Each day, I try to build -current. (Hey, it's good for a laugh. :-) You will gain

acquiring duplicate lock of same type

2002-03-26 Thread John Hay
I have seen these messages on my slow 266MHz dual Pentium II machine with a kernel build with source from after Matt and Jake's commits. Is there anyone interrested in it? It happened while doing a cvs -q update -PAd. acquiring duplicate lock of same type: PCPU KNOTE 1st @

Re: Superfast clock on current.

2002-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: Kyle Butt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My system clock is running twice as fast as it should be, but it doesn't affect timing functions. Ex: [...] Has anyone else experienced this problem? I'm seeing the exact same problem on, guess