On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:19:56AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > That being that some of us actually WANT /etc to be left the fsck alone.
> > We NFS mount / and that / has /etc as it should be. I also cannot follow
> > what you are trying to do with /etc/conf. Perhaps you could comment that
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:16:58AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > For the benefit of packet sniffers and other things that only want
> > read-only access to /dev/bpf*, what do people think of adding a 'bpf'
> > group for those programs? This allows
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:40:44AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Since im very interested in diskless/dataless, and i've been at it for some
> > time now, i made some changes to libstand/bootp.c and /etc/rc.diskless1
> > which i wouldn't mind receiving commnets/suggestions, and if possible
> >
> I'll commit this to rc.diskless1
this will only work if you include the changes to bootp.c
>
> +if [ -z "`hostname -s`" ]; then
> +hostname=`kenv dhcp.host-name`
> +hostname $hostname
> +echo "Hostname is $hostname"
> +fi
>
> BUT you've missed the
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm pretty sure Solaris also used 4K pages for swappable memory
> in the kernel, as well: 4M pages don't make much sense, since
> you could, for example, exhaust KVA space with 250 kernel modules
> (250 X (1 data + 1 code) * 4M = 2G).
It doesn't use
Any word on when current.freebsd.org or releng4.freebsd.org will be
available again? I noticed some discussion of this dating back to February
but did not see a final date. If it is still going to be down for a while
anyone know of an alternative site? Thanks.
Justin Heath
To Unsubscribe: se
> No setuid executables ... it's a mystery to me how one encounters this
> code path when running netscape :-(
Hmmm, after patch about FILEDESC_LOCK (1.139), my netscape can run
correctly. (@_@)
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // FreeBSD P
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> First, alot of this stuff is slowly sinking in ... after repeatedly
> reading it and waiting for the headache to disapate:)
>
> But, one thing that I'm still not clear on ...
>
> If I have 4Gig of RAM in a server, does it make any sense to have swap
> space on that se
David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If you want more, then you need to use a 64 bit processor (or use a
> > processor that supports bank selection, and hack up FreeBSD to do
> > bank swapping on 2G at a time, just like Linux has been hacked up,
> > and expect t
Hi, I'm having trouble compiling the Arla (AFS) port on CURRENT, it looks
like certain structures have changed. Is anyone running Arla on current?
If it would be the right thing to do, I can post the errors here.
Scott
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
>>> Kernel build for SHALMANESER started on Mon Apr 22 17:11:36 CEST 2002
--
===> SHALMANESER
[...]
cd /usr/src/sys/modules ; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SHALMANESER
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> Kde3 seems to work great under -current, kdegames3 fails to compile
> though. I get the following. Any ideas would be appreciated.
> In file included from fcs.h:57,
> from freecell.c:23:
> md5.h:17: redefinition of `u_int32_t'
>
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> Take a look at this:
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=245329+248644+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-hackers/20010624.freebsd-hackers
This is actually no longer valid, since there have been changes
to both the PDE caclcualtions and the kernel base
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This OS -- and its Darwin offspring --
> extensively use what are called "daemons" (which is how Pagans write
> "demon" -- they are notoriously poor spellers: magick, vampyre, etc.)
> which is a program that hides in the background, doing things without
> the user's n
Kde3 seems to work great under -current, kdegames3 fails to compile
though. I get the following. Any ideas would be appreciated.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/games/kdegames3/work/kdegames-3.0/konquest'
Making all in kpat
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/games/kdegames3/work
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:20:07AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:09:26 -0500,
> Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm curious ... could you send the output of
> >
> > pkg_info -L linux-netscape-navigator-4.79 | xargs ls -l
>
> Attached.
No setuid executa
> > For the benefit of packet sniffers and other things that only want
> > read-only access to /dev/bpf*, what do people think of adding a 'bpf'
> > group for those programs? This allows bpf devices to be read by
> > programs running with an effective gid of 'bpf' instead of the current
> > requi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:40:44AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> Since im very interested in diskless/dataless, and i've been at it for some
> time now, i made some changes to libstand/bootp.c and /etc/rc.diskless1
> which i wouldn't mind receiving commnets/suggestions, and if possible
> incorpora
> I have no idea about this. I'm portupgrade'ing linux_base,
> linux-netscape-* port and I'll try this again.
Hmm, I can reproduce this even after upgrading related ports...
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // FreeBSD Project
To Unsubscrib
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:09:26 -0500,
Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious ... could you send the output of
>
> pkg_info -L linux-netscape-navigator-4.79 | xargs ls -l
Attached.
> Also, does `/compat/linux/bin/sh' blow up for you?
No, I can invoke this without problem..
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:40:44AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> Since im very interested in diskless/dataless, and i've been at it for some
> time now, i made some changes to libstand/bootp.c and /etc/rc.diskless1
> which i wouldn't mind receiving commnets/suggestions, and if possible
> incorpora
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:03:01PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> in FreeBSD 5.0 DP1 there is /usr/tmp
> 2 drwxrwxrwt 2 root wheel 512 Apr 11 12:37 /usr/tmp/
>
> any particular reason for this directory? I'm asking because i like to
> keep / and /usr read only, and /tmp is linked to /usr/
< said:
>> > expr -lgrove : -l\(.*\)
>> > expr -- -L/export/ports/textproc/jade/work/jade-1.2.1/lib/.libs : -l\(.*\)
>> > If we are going to leave this behaviour, we will have to teach libtool
>> > how to call expr(1) differently on -stable and -current and it looks
>> > like yet again different
First, alot of this stuff is slowly sinking in ... after repeatedly
reading it and waiting for the headache to disapate:)
But, one thing that I'm still not clear on ...
If I have 4Gig of RAM in a server, does it make any sense to have swap
space on that server also? Again, from what I'm readin
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:35:49PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> A kern_descrip.c is updated by tanimura after your r1.137. Could you
> try with r1.138?
Just updated to today's -CURRENT. I still cannot reproduce the issue.
I'm curious ... could you send the output of
pkg_info -L linux-netsc
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:27:50PM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> > > How-to-repeat: launch linux-netscape while in X11
> >
> > Are you absolutely sure all kernel modules are up to date? A
> > sure-fire way to cause panics with linux applications is to use an
> > out of date linux.ko.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 14:07:50 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You could either pretend that yflag was not set (what ache was
> > suggesting) or set yflag if the year of the last login was not
> > this year (possibly more useful).
>
> ...or always
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Could people test this in-kernel DRM and tell me how it works for them?
> Seems to work fine here (trusty ol' Matrox G200 w/8 MB). Is there a
> particular DRI application I can use to somehow stress-test
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> > You aren't going to be able to exceed 4G, no matter what you do,
> > because that's the limit of your address space.
> >
> > If you want more, then you need to use a 64 bit processor (or use a
> > processor that supports bank selection, and hack up FreeBSD to do
> > b
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:25:17PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > As Adrian Penisoara already reported
> >
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=19645+0+current/freebsd-current
> >
> > there is panic in -current. I believe it is related to
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Yes; I forgot to write the clause about it only being equivalent to a
> panic if certain options (mainly INVARIANTS) are configured.
>
> > do see that falloc does lock the file descriptor table too, though ---
> > I wonder how it ever worked.
>
> I
>Might, might not. ISTR strftime() can't correctly emulate ctime(),
>but some other format might be preferrable. Do you have a format
>string handy?
I'd think something like what "last" does would be good.
d_first = (*nl_langinfo(D_MD_ORDER) == 'd');
...
(void) strftime(ct,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> For the benefit of packet sniffers and other things that only want
> read-only access to /dev/bpf*, what do people think of adding a 'bpf'
> group for those programs? This allows bpf devices to be read by
> programs running with an effective gid of
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > No, there's no stats collected on this stuff, because it's a pretty
> > > obvious and straight-forward thing: you have to have a KVA space large
> > > enough that, once you su
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:25:17PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I use the same patch. Locking here is essentially equivalent to calling
> > panic() here (except it gives a more confusing panic message :-).
>
> :-) That's a bit of an overstatemen
Test - Please ignore
- Original Message -
From: "David Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Terry Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE not easily scalable to large servers ... ?
> Thus
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:28:41AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
> Today's -current kernel. This happend when I invoke linux-netscape.
Does it happen every time? I cannot reproduce it.
What is odd is that fdcheckstd() is only called when exec'ing a
set[ug]id executable -- any idea what set[ug]
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:32:39 -0500,
Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it happen every time? I cannot reproduce it.
Yes.
> What is odd is that fdcheckstd() is only called when exec'ing a
> set[ug]id executable -- any idea what set[ug]id program is being
> exec'd here?
I have
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you want more, then you need to use a 64 bit processor (or use a
> processor that supports bank selection, and hack up FreeBSD to do
> bank swapping on 2G at a time, just like Linux has been hacked up,
> and expect that it won't be very useful).
Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could either pretend that yflag was not set (what ache was
> suggesting) or set yflag if the year of the last login was not
> this year (possibly more useful).
...or always print the year. Does anybody have any patches? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgr
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > No, there's no stats collected on this stuff, because it's a pretty
> > obvious and straight-forward thing: you have to have a KVA space large
> > enough that, once you subtract out 4K for each 4M of physical memory and
> >
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:22:20PM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>
> > Panicstring: bremfree: bp 0xc77fb678 not locked
>
> This isn't the real panic, it's a second panic caused by trying to
> sync disks.
D'oh... I hope the gdb trace left mor
Haven't tried all the new stuff, but i've installed it on several different
hosts and so far have had no real problems, good work!!
Since im very interested in diskless/dataless, and i've been at it for some
time now, i made some changes to libstand/bootp.c and /etc/rc.diskless1
which i wouldn't
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> > No, there's no stats collected on this stuff, because it's a
> > pretty obvious and straight-forward thing: you have to have a
> > KVA space large enough that, once you subtract out 4K for each
> > 4M of physical memory and swap (max 4G total for both), you
> > end up
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> As Adrian Penisoara already reported
>
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=19645+0+current/freebsd-current
>
> there is panic in -current. I believe it is related to the next
> commit:
>
> nectar 2002/04/18 17:45:29 PDT
>
> Modified
John Hay wrote:
> > > I see the new new behaviour of expr(1) requires you to add '--' if your
> > > commandline arguments might start with a '-'. This does break things
> > > a little because our old expr(1) does not understand a '--' in the
> > > beginning and the new one don't work right without
47 matches
Mail list logo
