Re: Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > Hi Ruslan, > > > > During make release I see a lot of these messages: > > > > # > > make: no target to make. > > "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 140: warning: "make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar > > e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V

Re: phk malloc() sometimes forget to set errno

2002-08-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: >I found at least one case: Try this patch: Index: malloc.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.70 diff -u -r1.70 malloc.c --- mal

Re: Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Hi Ruslan, > > During make release I see a lot of these messages: > > # > make: no target to make. > "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 140: warning: "make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar > e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE" returned

Re: Compiler error XFree86-Server

2002-08-08 Thread Marc Recht
> Because chances are good that the bugs still aren't fixed. I reported a > bug related to optimization with -march=athlon recently and the reply If you've got a newer Athlon (XP) then you could compile it with -march=athlon-xp. I've filed a PR with a patch against bsd.cpu.mk (misc/41425) recent

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: > > > Why?? I disagree. CD9600 can go to the 3rd floppy -- if I am installing > > > from floppy's I am 99.9% chance doing a network install. [ ... ] > Calm down and relax. Which part of my patch removed support for > anything that might be needed during the install? > > ... We

Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
Hi Ruslan, During make release I see a lot of these messages: # make: no target to make. "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 140: warning: "make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE" returned non-zero status make: no target to make. "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 14

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:20:53AM +0200 I heard the voice of John Hay, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'm wondering if that was because something in our stack was bust or > because of some firewall or other network thing? I'm not sure. This was 4.6.1-RC2, across a local 100mbps LAN. The FTP server

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 14:50, John Hay wrote: > So should I commit the code and let us tune what go on which floppy > later or should I just sit back and enjoy the ride? I'm not worried > too much because the snaps on ftp.za.freebsd.org is working again. > :-) ... Yes they are non-standard (they us

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
Hi Terry, > > Why?? I disagree. CD9600 can go to the 3rd floppy -- if I am installing > > from floppy's I am 99.9% chance doing a network install. > > I have an idea... > > If you only support installing via whatever option wins a vote > as The One True Way, then there'll be a 100% chance tha

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
> > > I think MSDOS installs are pretty rare and NFS ones even rarer (FTP is > > > easier to setup) > > > > I've had one recent example here where FTP wouldn't work, but NFS flew. > > Weird but I can appreciate it's possible. I'm wondering if that was because something in our stack was bust or

Re: Compiler error XFree86-Server

2002-08-08 Thread Michael Nottebrock
David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>>Please submit a full bug report, >>>with preprocessed source if appropriate. >>>See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in >>>/usr/ports/x11-se

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 14:15, Terry Lambert wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > Why?? I disagree. CD9600 can go to the 3rd floppy -- if I am installing > > from floppy's I am 99.9% chance doing a network install. > > I have an idea... > > If you only support installing via whatever option wins a

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 14:25, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > I think MSDOS installs are pretty rare and NFS ones even rarer (FTP is > > easier to setup) > > I've had one recent example here where FTP wouldn't work, but NFS flew. Weird but I can appreciate it's possible. I wasn't suggesting removin

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 02:12:33PM +0930 I heard the voice of Daniel O'Connor, and lo! it spake thus: > > I think MSDOS installs are pretty rare and NFS ones even rarer (FTP is > easier to setup) I've had one recent example here where FTP wouldn't work, but NFS flew. -- Matthew Fuller (M

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: > Why?? I disagree. CD9600 can go to the 3rd floppy -- if I am installing > from floppy's I am 99.9% chance doing a network install. I have an idea... If you only support installing via whatever option wins a vote as The One True Way, then there'll be a 100% chance that th

Re: Comments on Release Building for -current

2002-08-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in > > > libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c, ... > > If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimiz

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 13:59, David O'Brien wrote: > Why?? I disagree. CD9600 can go to the 3rd floppy -- if I am installing > from floppy's I am 99.9% chance doing a network install. NFSCLIENT > definitely should be on the 1st or 2nd, not 3rd floppy -- again because I > am most likely doing a n

Re: Compiler error XFree86-Server

2002-08-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >Please submit a full bug report, > >with preprocessed source if appropriate. > >See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in > >>/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/w

Re: Firewire support

2002-08-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:15:18PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > Given what they're evidently trying to do with the code (make it available > on an evaluation basis, and then sell licenses to use it in products), it > makes no sense that they would want to release it for use in FreeBSD. To > r

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:27:15PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > +CD9660 cd9660 3 options "ISO 9660 Filesystem" > > +MSDOSFSmsdosfs 3 options "MSDOS filsystem" > > +NFSCLIENT nfsclient 3 options "Network Filesystem Client" > > SYSVSHMsysvsh

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Michael C. Wu
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 06:32:40PM +0200, John Hay scribbled: | Here is a try at a 3 floppy system. Most people should be able to | install with the first 2 floppies (kern.flp and mfsroot.flp). Just | those that need a driver on the third floppy (drivers.flp) will | need it. | | If this idea is a

Re: src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchgen/crunched_main.c

2002-08-08 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
pmedwards> The last commit to this appears to have broken it. "main()" was pmedwards> updated to include envp, but "crunched_main()" calls "main()" pmedwards> without the extra argument. pmedwards> This causes make release of -current on -stable to barf for me, pmedwards> so I can't truly test th

Re: Firewire support

2002-08-08 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 20:20:24 -0500, Peter Schultz wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 16:45, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote: > > > > Did you suggest the same API should be used on both Darwin and FreeBSD ? > > > > Or, should we sha

Re: src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchgen/crunched_main.c

2002-08-08 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
pmedwards> The last commit to this appears to have broken it. "main()" was pmedwards> updated to include envp, but "crunched_main()" calls "main()" pmedwards> without the extra argument. pmedwards> This causes make release of -current on -stable to barf for me, pmedwards> so I can't truly test th

Re: Firewire support

2002-08-08 Thread Peter Schultz
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 16:45, Terry Lambert wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote: > > > Did you suggest the same API should be used on both Darwin and FreeBSD ? > > > Or, should we share the same code on the device driver level ? > > > > > > Although I ha

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Thursday 08 August 2002 02:06 pm, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > > On Thursday 08 August 2002 12:05 pm, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > I spoke too soon :-( > > > > Now it errors at: > > > > sql_analyse.o: In function `proc_analyse_init(THD*, st_order*, > > sel

Re: Comments on Release Building for -current

2002-08-08 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: >> Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this. See PR 40209. I'm sorry >> I haven't found time to look at it in detail. > > > O2-compiling -CURRENT (and -march=athlon ...) still manages to break > DCCs in xchat And, through __vnprintf, nawk t

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > On Thursday 08 August 2002 12:05 pm, Beech Rintoul wrote: > I spoke too soon :-( > > Now it errors at: > > sql_analyse.o: In function `proc_analyse_init(THD*, st_order*, select_result*, >List&)': > sql_analyse.o(.text+0x1f): undefined referenc

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > But then everyone needs to boot with 3 floppies. With my way, we can > > hopefully select the optimum so that most people will only need 2 > > floppies, ie the most popular drivers should go on mfsroot.flp. > > Both approaches have its own advantages and disadvantages. IM

Re: Firewire support

2002-08-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote: > > Did you suggest the same API should be used on both Darwin and FreeBSD ? > > Or, should we share the same code on the device driver level ? > > > > Although I have not read the terms and condition carefully, I am afraid > >

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Thursday 08 August 2002 12:05 pm, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Thursday 08 August 2002 11:50 am, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > > > Anyone have a pointer to get this to build? > > > cc -DMYSQL_SERVER > > > -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" -fno-except

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Charlie Root
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:05:44PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Thursday 08 August 2002 11:50 am, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > > > Anyone have a pointer to get this to build? > > > cc -DMYSQL_SERVER > > > -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="

Re: 3 floppy system for -current releases

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
Ruslan, Here is my latest version. It has all the changes you requested and a fix for the case where there isn't a third floppy. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: usr.sbin/sysinstall/system.c === RC

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Thursday 08 August 2002 11:50 am, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > > Anyone have a pointer to get this to build? > > cc -DMYSQL_SERVER > > -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti > > -DMYSQLD_NET_RETRY_COUNT=10

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Steven Ames
Edit line 92 of sql/mysqld.cc: --#ifdef __linux__ ++ #ifdef __FreeBSD__ However that'll only get you past this set of errors. And then it gets tricky and has something to do with the new C++ compiler that I haven't quite wrapped my mind around yet. -Steve - Original Message - From

Re: Comments on Release Building for -current

2002-08-08 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > >>Andrew Kolchoogin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>... >>>sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in >>>libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c, >>>as such, if

Re: mysql-server build errors

2002-08-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 08), Beech Rintoul said: > Anyone have a pointer to get this to build? > cc -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" > -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -DMYSQLD_NET_RETRY_COUNT=100 -c mysqld.cc > /usr/include/tcpd.h: In function `void* handl