i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

openssh and lastlog

2002-08-31 Thread Tim Robbins
I've been seeing these messages for months.. Aug 31 20:19:29 cinq sshd[2342]: /var/log/lastlog: Permission denied .. because sshd has dropped root privileges by the time pam_lastlog tries to log the message. I realise this was discussed on this list about 2 months ago, but it hasn't been fixed

Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread Edwin Culp
Today's current gave me the following error while building a new kernel after a successful make world. cd /usr/src/sys/modules ; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850N/modules KMODDIR=/boot/kernel MACHINE=i386 make cleandir === 3dfx === accf_data === accf_http === agp === aha ===

[] freebsd-current .

2002-08-31 Thread
Title: ½Åû¼­¸ÞÀÏÆû ¼º¸í Áֹεî·Ï ¹øÈ£ (-ÀÔ·Â) Á÷Àå ÀüÈ­ ÈÞ´ëÆù

Re: Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
Today's current gave me the following error while building a new kernel after a successful make world. cd /usr/src/sys/modules ; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850N/modules KMODDIR=/boot/kernel MACHINE=i386 make cleandir === 3dfx === accf_data === accf_http === agp === aha

Re: Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Justin T. Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Today's current gave me the following error while building a new kernel | after a successful make world. | | cd /usr/src/sys/modules ; | MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850N/modules | KMODDIR=/boot/kernel MACHINE=i386 make

Re: ACPI no longer disabled when APM enabled?

2002-08-31 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Since the recent ACPI import (i believe), it seems that ACPI is no longer disabled when APM is enabled. I do not explicitely disable API anywhere. In the past, I have seen upon bootup a message apm: Other PM system enabled. and the kernel would

Re: Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread Bob Willcox
I now get a bit further: === aic7xxx === aic7xxx/aicasm make -f /.amd_mnt/han/host/usr/src/sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm/../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile MAKESRCPATH=/.amd_mnt/han/host/usr/src/sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm/../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm cleandir make -f

Truss segfaults when tracing sshd

2002-08-31 Thread Anders Nordby
Submitter-Id: current-users Originator:Anders Nordby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Confidential: no Synopsis: Truss segfaults when tracing sshd Severity: serious Priority: medium Category: bin Class: sw-bug Release: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386

Re: Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread David Wolfskill
[I tried to send this unicast to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the attempt was rejected with an reason: 550 5.7.1 Access denied as the only excuse given for the behavior. dhw] Adding a cleandepend stanza similar to the just-added cleandir stanza seems to get beyond that. Cheers, david -- David H.

New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Apparently Makefile not have aicasm target (newly created clean building directory): rm -f .olddep if [ -f .depend ]; then mv .depend .olddep; fi make _kernel-depend cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
Apparently Makefile not have aicasm target (newly created clean building directory): I can't reproduce this here. My kernel Makefile includes an aicasm target. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:15:55 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: Apparently Makefile not have aicasm target (newly created clean building directory): I can't reproduce this here. My kernel Makefile includes an aicasm target. From where aicasm target must come in? As I see,

Re: CURRENT's termcap broken

2002-08-31 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
... # # and midnight commander shows all with -, +, | instead of # # pesudo-graphics. # # It seems this is the price we pay for alignment with what XFree86 ships. # # I see Wait, maybe I was too fast and there is a solution. Looking at the xterm FAQ,

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:15:55 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: Apparently Makefile not have aicasm target (newly created clean building directory): I can't reproduce this here. My kernel Makefile includes an aicasm target. I have only this lines included, but not aicasm target itself. I

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 21:39:40 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: I wonder about optional ahc ahd line here. Is it assumes that _both_ must be on? Yes, it was the bug place. Here is the workaround which fix it for me: --- files.bak Sat Aug 31 20:46:30 2002 +++ files Sat Aug 31

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
I think this is in -STABLE not -CURRENT, I'm having this problem there. Later, George -- George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neville-Neil Consulting www.neville-neil.com I learn only to be contented. inscription at

Re: New SCSI: can't 'make depend'

2002-08-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:52:09 -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: I think this is in -STABLE not -CURRENT, I'm having this problem there. The problem is in -current too, see my following optional ahc ahd bug explanation, aicasm target inserted only when _both_ of them are enabled.

Re: 5.0 release schedule?

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: I think we're on our way to stabilizing -CURRENT enough for a DP2 soon. I would sit and wait it out just a tad longer. :-) A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good yesterday's -current was will affect

Re: CURRENT's termcap broken

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: 20020827: Our /etc/termcap now has all the entries from the XFree86 xterm almost unchanged. This means xterm now supports color by default. If you used TERM=xterm-color in the past you now should use

Re: CURRENT's termcap broken

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: # Mutt shows this when I start vi as my editor or run fetchmail: # # TERMCAP, line 0, terminal 'xterm-color': enter_alt_charset_mode but no acs_chars # # My centericq window ends up using pipe signs (|), minus signs (-) and

Re: CURRENT's termcap broken

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:06:54PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Aug 28), Jens Schweikhardt said: On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:35:32PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: # On (2002/08/28 19:04), Jens Schweikhardt wrote: # Yes, use plain TERM=xterm. It's got color now as it should.

Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with using namespace std;

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: In general, though, the answer is that 3.1 sucks and 2.9x does not. 8-). Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience. Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy non-maintenance release level GCC;

Re: bin/42255: Truss segfaults when tracing sshd

2002-08-31 Thread David Malone
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:45:26PM +0200, Anders Nordby wrote: # truss -p `sockstat -l | egrep 'sshd.*tcp4' | awk '{print $3}'` Log into the system with sshd, and truss will segfault: There is an even easier way to reproduce this: gonzo 9% sleep 10 [2] 35245 gonzo 10% truss -p 35245

Problems reading vmcores

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
I'm having difficulty reading vmcore images with gdb (either the system version or the port). (gdb) gohan10# gdb /a/kernel.debug /a/vmcore.0 GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are

Re: Problems reading vmcores

2002-08-31 Thread Yann Berthier
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having difficulty reading vmcore images with gdb (either the system version or the port). (gdb) gohan10# gdb /a/kernel.debug /a/vmcore.0 But you need to specify the -k flag to gdb to use it against kernel dumps, I'm sure it will give much

emu10k1 maintainer

2002-08-31 Thread Mario Goebbels
Is there still someone maintaining the emu10k1 driver, or the pcm driver in general? -mg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Problems reading vmcores

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Yann Berthier wrote: On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having difficulty reading vmcore images with gdb (either the system version or the port). (gdb) gohan10# gdb /a/kernel.debug /a/vmcore.0 But you need to specify the -k

Re: Problems reading vmcores

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:00:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Yann Berthier wrote: On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having difficulty reading vmcore images with gdb (either the system version or the port). (gdb) gohan10#

Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with using namespace std;

2002-08-31 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: In general, though, the answer is that 3.1 sucks and 2.9x does not. 8-). Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience. Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy

Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with using namespace std;

2002-08-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:06:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: In general, though, the answer is that 3.1 sucks and 2.9x does not. 8-). Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience.

Re: Problems reading vmcores

2002-08-31 Thread Yann Berthier
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:00:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Yann Berthier wrote: On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having difficulty reading vmcore images with gdb (either the

Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with using namespace std;

2002-08-31 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already planning a 3.3. 8-). And comments on this list to that effect. I don't follow. The GCC group branches previous to a release and makes an initial + point releases from it. I thought it was the

Page faults from bento cluster (Re: Problems reading vmcores)

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
I worked out what was wrong: some of them were very old vmcores that had never been saved. There's another problem though, because those machines have all panicked in the past 24 hours, so I don't know where the remaining dumps went. Kris panic: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12:

Re: Page faults from bento cluster (Re: Problems reading vmcores)

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
Another page fault in umount panic: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x28 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02012ed stack pointer = 0x10:0xda021b1c frame

Re: Page faults from bento cluster (Re: Problems reading vmcores)

2002-08-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
Another one. I have the cores if anyone needs to look at them..otherwise I'll stop posting these for now. Kris panic: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x4 fault code = supervisor read, page not present

why pay $35.00 when you can get better service for $14.95

2002-08-31 Thread barry_abdul
LATEST NEWS: The new domain names are finally available to the general public at discount prices. Now you can register one of the exciting new .BIZ or .INFO domain names, as well as the original .COM and .NET names for just $14.95. These brand new domain extensions were recently approved by

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree