Re: Do we still need portmap(8)?

2002-10-08 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
M == M Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: M I think that we need a mtree.obsolete that goes through and M deletes these sorts of things as part of installworld/upgrade M scripts. No solution like this will ever work for everyone, or in every situation. For example, you generally

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Mon, 30.09.2002, × 23:09, Poul-Henning Kamp ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it fails to work. Ok, diskcheckd (old binary) no isn't

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Mon, 07.10.2002, × 22:13, Andrew Gallatin ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: Every so often, my X server locks up. It seems to be in a tight loop, 95% user time, and making only these ktrace'able calls: 27069 XFree86 0.019988 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 27069 XFree86 0.39

X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Robert Suetterlin
Hi! I read a few threads on the stableness of X11 under CURRENT. Some people proposed it was more stable under STABLE. I can report that my X on STABLE: XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 3

Re: Can't make depend or buildkernel for a custom kernel

2002-10-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-07 22:29, M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff : : Cool. make depend works now, let's see if the resulting kernel does. :) I hit this same problem.

Re: X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Jon
Robert Suetterlin wrote: Hi! I read a few threads on the stableness of X11 under CURRENT. Some people proposed it was more stable under STABLE. I can report that my X on STABLE: XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: /usr/include/stdlib.h:51: syntax error before size_t

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 07 at 16:28, Giorgos Keramidas spoke: By grepping through buildworld logs I saw this passing by: # cd /usr/src/include; make buildincludes; make installincludes I did `make includes' which obviously does both buildincludes and installincludes. Afterwords I was able to

Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
Hello, I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the case for current as well as 4.6.2-Release. Is there work in progress on this issue?

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: Hello, I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the case for current as well as 4.6.2-Release. What

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: Hello, I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the case for current as

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: Hello, I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 08 at 14:32, Soeren Schmidt spoke: It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: What burner is this ? (dmesg please!) PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W4012A 1.02 http://home.datacomm.ch/~hampi/dmesg/freebsd Is there work in progress on this issue? Its not an issue as such, its more like a feature of some

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Maxim Sobolev writes: Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far more stable. Sigh. Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel updating I'm also often observing XFree86 dying

booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 08 at 13:39, Ceri Davies spoke: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: kern/43601 states that it's currently not possible to boot current with one of these controllers - I'm having the same problem. Did you need to do anything special for this to boot ? I

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:04:27 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Did the Bezier too big stuff start when people upgraded their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking suspicion that

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:08:39PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: On Oct 08 at 13:39, Ceri Davies spoke: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: kern/43601 states that it's currently not possible to boot current with one of these controllers - I'm having the same

hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread suken woo
hi,all: get the error messages during gmake core gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' Compiling

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. Bye, Alexander. -- Yes, I've heard of decaf. What's your point?

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. That won't fix signal 6. That

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Ceri Davies wrote: If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. Only if you have option ATA_STATIC_ID in your kernel config. No, I'm talking about a panic just after probing SMBus. This patch solves this problem,

Re: Fw: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread suken woo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Yuri Khotyaintsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: suken woo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:16 PM Subject: Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error This file was recently removed from

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: It seems Ceri Davies wrote: If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. Only if you have option ATA_STATIC_ID in your kernel config. No, I'm talking

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. That won't fix signal 6. That will just fix the kernel

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: To fix signal 6, I think you need to rebuild your X server. Do you think I have to rebuild or do you know I have to rebuild? I've rebuilt several times. I'm guessing NO, since I still have the problems periodically. --

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. That won't fix

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Ceri Davies wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: It seems Ceri Davies wrote: If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. Only if you have option ATA_STATIC_ID in your

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Mike Barcroft
suken woo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi,all: get the error messages during gmake core gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' gmake[2]: Entering directory

Re: Removing old binaries

2002-10-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I think it confuses the issue rather than solving it. We're talking : about removing binaries which are no longer needed, not replacing : binaries that are

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Andrew Gallatin wrote: Maxim Sobolev writes: Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far more stable. Sigh. Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel updating I'm also

Re: X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Jon wrote: Crashes fo r me too, reporting Sigint 6, Basically whenever it is idle. Usually just running Opera and Mozilla-mail. Any Sugestions?? This has been discussed extensively in recent days. Kris msg44294/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Changes to Kerberos daemon startup

2002-10-08 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I have a patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~gordon/patches/kerberos.diff that changes the variables used for kerberos startup. I haven't had a chance to test these changes just yet, but I'd like peoples opinion on them. There will be a corresponding change in rc.d scripts that I have to make

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: Andrew Gallatin wrote: Maxim Sobolev writes: Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far more stable. Sigh. Agreed. I could add that after

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read testa testa Terminated gtetlow@roark:~$ Further investigtion shows that

Re: addport b0rken in current

2002-10-08 Thread Will Andrews
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 06:15:38PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Any progress on this??? It's PITA that I can't use my -current development box to commit new ports. Sorry, I hadn't even started to look at this. It seems to be a -CURRENT cvs(1) problem judging by your log, in that it ignores the

Re: tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Gordon Tetlow wrote: I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read testa testa Terminated gtetlow@roark:~$ Further investigtion shows

DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
Hi Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface sysctl - read sysctl value sysctlw - write sysctl value Example: Translate string to sysctl MIB: db sysctlw 0.3 hw\.model 0xcd1aaeec: 6 2 db Now get string by this MIB: db sysctl 6.2 s 0xcd1ab24: Pentium

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: Maxim Sobolev wrote: Andrew Gallatin wrote: Maxim Sobolev writes: Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far more stable. Sigh.

Re: [acpi-jp 1789] Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-10-08 Thread Lars Eggert
Mark, any news on this issue? I'm seeing the same problems with suspend on a Dell Latitude C600 with a ATI Mobility M3... Lars Mark Santcroos wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Do you think that there is a change that this is in the direction of DPMS,

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread mgoward
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:41:40AM -0700 or thereabouts, Dag-Erling Smorgrav was said to have scribed: -- stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/i386/obj/local0/scratch/des/src/i386/usr/include

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Kabaev
./aicasm: 877 instructions used ./aicasm: 686 instructions used cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Maxime Henrion
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: Hi Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface [...] Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly about style though. - There is a TOK_STRING_SIZE macro which defines the size of the the db_tok_string

Re: vnode lock assertion failure in nfs_doio()

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Don Lewis wrote: Version 1.114 of nfs_bio.c added a call to ASSERT_VOP_LOCKED() to nfs_doio(). I've been running a kernel with the DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS option and I can consistently get this assertion to fail by running mozilla with an nfs mounted home directory. The DDB

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. I think the

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Julian Elischer
VERY COOL! On 8 Oct 2002, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: Hi Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface sysctl - read sysctl value sysctlw - write sysctl value Example: Translate string to sysctl MIB: db sysctlw 0.3 hw\.model 0xcd1aaeec:

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Jeff Roberson said: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible.

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Alexander Kabaev wrote: ./aicasm: 877 instructions used ./aicasm: 686 instructions used cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. mkdep: compile failed ***

RE: -march=pentium4 (CPUTYPE?=p4) breaks libm (src/lib/msun)

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, If one does libm compile with -march=pentium4, there seem some math related functions be broken. -march=pentiumpro still works fine. Happens with gcc 3.1.1 and gcc 3.2.1 prerelease. Ports which are broken with libm and -march=pentium4 - xmms

-march=pentium4 (CPUTYPE?=p4) breaks libm (src/lib/msun)

2002-10-08 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, If one does libm compile with -march=pentium4, there seem some math related functions be broken. -march=pentiumpro still works fine. Happens with gcc 3.1.1 and gcc 3.2.1 prerelease. Ports which are broken with libm and -march=pentium4 - xmms (no sound) - mpg123 (no sound) - openoffice

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Hui
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:02:46PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: AFAICT the machine/ansi.h include here is bogus. Removing it should fix this. It's a problem known by me, but I haven't committed a fix just yet to our CVS. Working on signal/sigsetjmp stuff here right now. Eventually a new patch

Re: [PATCH] Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-08 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 03:48:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: *** OK, it's very hard to believe you didn't break into the *** debugger and manually call pnaic to get this to happen. You're right, this is exactly what I did. I can't personally repeat the problem, so you're elected to do

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: Hi Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface [...] Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly about style though. Attached fixed patch

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Hui
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:01:01PM +0800, suken woo wrote: /usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:49:26: machine/ansi.h: No such file or directory With the current release of HotSpot for -current, you'll have to know enough about C programming to be able to fix

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so committing it onto the vendor

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... Question: Did the Bezier too big stuff start when people upgraded their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking suspicion that the fp context is not being saved

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Peter Wemm
David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Discount Smokes

2002-10-08 Thread Fred Elan
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_00B1_50B14E5B.D1605A60

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you

swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed

2002-10-08 Thread Michael McGoldrick
Just noticed a whole load of these in my /var/log/messages: Oct 9 00:43:31 uriel kernel: swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 1065 6,size 8192, error 5 Seeming to correspond to a temporary hang of X. Any ideas? -- Michael McGoldrick: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The

Re: tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Tim Robbins
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:01:09AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read

Re: My problems with GEOM

2002-10-08 Thread Seth Hieronymus
I think your recent commits have fixed my hang on boot with an empty ZIP-drive. Thank you. Seth To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Makefile, line 4194: warning: duplicate script for target geom_bsd.o ignored cc1: warnings being treated as errors /h/des/src/sys/dev/advansys/adv_pci.c: In function `adv_pci_attach': /h/des/src/sys/dev/advansys/adv_pci.c:197: warning: overflow

Re: [PATCH] Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-08 Thread Don Lewis
On 8 Oct, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 03:48:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Following the advice from the spl* man page I turned the spl* calls to a mutex and was surprised to see it working. My SMP -current survived a 'make -j16 buildworld' with make using kqueue()

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: My problems with GEOM

2002-10-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Seth Hieronymus writes: I think your recent commits have fixed my hang on boot with an empty ZIP-drive. Thank you. Cool. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: - I'm not sure if using the context of the init process to do sysctl calls is the right way to go. However, it is not very clear what you

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the ... Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there won't be a tag that corisponds with