On Tuesday 11 March 2003 23:47, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Is Qt expected to work on -CURRENT? Because on my system it won't
> even build:
[snip]
>The specified system/compiler is not supported:
>
>
>/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt31/work/qt-x11-free-3.1.1/mkspecs//usr/X11R6/mkspecs/defa
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Guibert de
Bruet writes:
>
>On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
>> Got this when booting a fresh kernel:
>>
>> Bad malloc flags: 4
>> Stack backtrace:
>> backtrace(c03953d4,4,1,c035e443,c1b6e500) at backtrace+0x17
>> malloc(3c,c03dfe80,4,c1b85d00,dcd7b
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Got this when booting a fresh kernel:
>
> Bad malloc flags: 4
> Stack backtrace:
> backtrace(c03953d4,4,1,c035e443,c1b6e500) at backtrace+0x17
> malloc(3c,c03dfe80,4,c1b85d00,dcd7bc78) at malloc+0x5b
What does the output of ls -l /etc/malloc.conf look
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew
P. Lentvorski, Jr." writes:
>An $8.00 wristwatch has much better time accuracy that your multi-$100 PC.
That's because the crystal in your wristwatch is cut specially so that it
has a flat temp-co at about 23-16 C, whereas the xtal in your computer
is has
Got this when booting a fresh kernel:
Bad malloc flags: 4
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c03953d4,4,1,c035e443,c1b6e500) at backtrace+0x17
malloc(3c,c03dfe80,4,c1b85d00,dcd7bc78) at malloc+0x5b
m_tag_alloc(0,e,30,4,c5a5bcc0) at m_tag_alloc+0x2f
ip6_addaux(c1b85d00,dcd7bcbc,c02af378,c1b85d00,c5bab800)
Running -current from March 11 on a dual cpu compaq 5100, there are some
warnings in the dmesg about the tl ethernet interface.
Here are the warnings:
malloc() of "128" with the following non-sleepablelocks held:
exclusive sleep mutex tl0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc4017aa8) locked @
/usr/src/5-
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:37:35 +0100 (MET)
Marcin CIE LAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the patches enclosed to emulators/rtc
> and emulators/vmware2 ports.
> Tested only for -current with:
> #define __FreeBSD_version 500104
Hum.. This is not work in my environment. Because MOD_LOAD initi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Can anyone help? Has someone a runnng diskless FBSD 5.0-R/5-CURRENT
: environment?
I fixed a couple of bugs in the /etc/rc.d files that broke diskless
boots about a month or two so after 5.0-RELEASE. It would
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan
Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here.
> I've noticed an interesting problem: I am using FreeBSD 5.0-p4 and
> GCC 3.2.1 and if I use "CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird" and "CFLAGS= -O2
> -mmmx -m3dnow -fomit-
04:00 GMT Mar 12:
Just cvsup'd and rebuilt with same result as 12 hours ago --
I see a kernel panic "page fault while in kernel mode" just
after attempting to mount the root filesystem.
The kernel from yesterday works fine and when I reboot the
filesystems come up clean, so the new kernel nevers w
Compile, run under gdb, then type "print test()" when the program receives
SIGABRT. Seems to work incorrectly on 4.7 too.
#include
#include
void
test(void)
{
puts("hello");
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
abort();
exit(0);
}
Tim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
I've trimmed to the relavent part of the stack.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> #11 0xc0232072 in bwrite (bp=0xce5313e0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:795
> #12 0xc0232a7c in bawrite (bp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1138
> #13 0xc023a02b in cluster_wbuild (vp=0xc4a21124, size=
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Derek Tattersall wrote:
> > Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
> > non-sleepablelocks held:
>
> The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
> transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
>
> John: did you look at my patch for t
Derek Tattersall wrote:
> Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepablelocks
> held:
The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
John: did you look at my patch for the locking?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe
Francisco Solsona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I just cvsup updated my tree (this is FreeBSD CURRENT, 5.0), and make
> buildworld breaks with:
It doesn't sound like your tree is completely in-sync.
> shouldn't MB_LEN_MAX be defined in /limits.h?
It's in revision 1.15 of .
Best reg
James Satterfield wrote:
> I guess I've just never paid that much attention to the clock. I think it's t
> ime for me to get a real clock and setup an NTP server.
> Thanks.
> James.
One of my gate boxes drifts about 11.5 sec a day. I use rdist to
keep all my hosts at each site in sync - vital for
You should send this information to the gcc folks. My understanding is
that they are interested in solving problems like this.
Doug
On Mon, 11 Mar 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
> noticed an interesting problem: I
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:24:55PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> You didn't say when your most recent upgrade was. If you're using
> 5.0-Release, you should upgrade to 5-current, where this problem should be
> fixed already.
>
> Doug
I buildworld/installworld daily. So it's not fixed.
Jiawei
--
"W
* Jonathan Lemon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030312 01:12]:
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:59:15 -0600 (CST)
> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: exclusive sleep mutex netisr...
> Organization:
> Cc:
>
> In a
You didn't say when your most recent upgrade was. If you're using
5.0-Release, you should upgrade to 5-current, where this problem should be
fixed already.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
FYI, -bugs is not a discussion list.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/49079; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin Machacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/49079: panic: b
In article you write:
>I see several instances of this in /var/log/messages after cvsup'ing
>Monday evening and rebuilding world and kernel. I haven't seen any
>messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
>
>Message:
>Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
>non-slee
Title: ±z¦³¤U¦C¯S½è¶Ü
«lÃz¡I¡I¾_¾Ù¡I¡I
±z¦³¤U¦C¯S½è¶Ü¡H
1.¨Æ·~¥ø¹Ï¤ß
2.¤£¥Ì¤ß¥¤Z
3.¤£º¡©ó²{ª¬
4.«i©ó±¹ï¥¼¨Ó
¥un±z¾Ö¦³¤W¦C¯S½è¡A§Ú̱N§K¶O°ö°V±z©Ò¦³¬ÛÃö§Þ¾¯à¤O¡A
I guess I've just never paid that much attention to the clock. I think it's time for
me to get a real clock and setup an NTP server.
Thanks.
James.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:24:57 -0800 (PST)
"Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, James Satterfield wrote:
>
>
Derek Tattersall wrote:
> I see several instances of this in /var/log/messages after cvsup'ing
> Monday evening and rebuilding world and kernel. I haven't seen any
> messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
>
> Message:
> Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, James Satterfield wrote:
> I'm getting what I think is substantial time drift on my -current boxes.
> My home firewall in particular drifts about .42 seconds every hour. My
> desktop machine drifted ~350 seconds over the last 5 days.
.42 s/ 1 hr is about 116 ppm stability
3
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:50:25PM -0800, James Satterfield wrote:
> I'm getting what I think is substantial time drift on my -current
> boxes. My home firewall in particular drifts about .42 seconds every
> hour. My desktop machine drifted ~350 seconds over the last 5 days.
>
> Anyone else seeing
I'm getting what I think is substantial time drift on my -current boxes. My home
firewall in particular drifts about .42 seconds every hour. My desktop machine drifted
~350 seconds over the last 5 days.
Anyone else seeing this?
James.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
Arjan van Leeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The port builds fine here on -CURRENT from 5 march. It is supposed to find the
> freebsd-g++ platform.
>
> If this doesn't work, try adding -platform=freebsd-g++ to the CONFIGURE_ARGS
> in the ports' Makefile.
Thanks. Turned out to be pilot error
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> > "device cloning" is really a wrong name for this, and I regret that
> > I every used that term. "On demand device creation" is closer,
> > but it doesn't have any sort of ring to it.
>
> Worst of all, "device cloning" is one of Terry's buzzwords. :-)
Actually, it's
The port builds fine here on -CURRENT from 5 march. It is supposed to find the
freebsd-g++ platform.
If this doesn't work, try adding -platform=freebsd-g++ to the CONFIGURE_ARGS
in the ports' Makefile.
Best regards,
Arjan
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 23:47, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Is Qt exp
This morning's kernel. User PPP, "cvs up".
Regards,
Vladimir~> sudo gdb -k /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KUSHNIR/kernel.debug /usr/crash/vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
panic: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x20
fault code
Hi,
I get the following error (or whatever) in my bootmessage:
agp0: mem 0xf000-0xf7ff at device 0.0 o
n pci0
pcib1: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.AGP_ - AE_NOT_F
OUND
I tried playing around in the bios but couldn't find anything that would fix this.
Could th
I see several instances of this in /var/log/messages after cvsup'ing
Monday evening and rebuilding world and kernel. I haven't seen any
messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
Message:
Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
non-sleepablelocks held:
Mar 11 17:33:
Is Qt expected to work on -CURRENT? Because on my system it won't
even build:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt31% pcvs up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt31% ident Makefile
Makefile:
$FreeBSD: ports/x11-toolkits/qt31/Makefile,v 1.134 2003/02/22 09:13:12 demon Exp $
[E
Hey, is anybody ever going to answer this email?
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:48:10PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:52:02PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:02:19PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> [...]
> > > Ok, with the patches below I can get to whe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Attila Nagy wri
tes:
>Hello,
>
>> Yes, I just got this myself today. I overlooked that devstat is not
>> locked when I moved the devstat to geom_disk. Expect a patch tonight.
>Great, thanks!
There is a patch which can be tried at:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patc
This card isn't detected by default, so I added the vendor and dev IDs to if_wi_pci.c.
Now it's detected, but doesn't attach. Here's what I think are the relevant bits from
dmesg.
pci2: physical bus=2
map[14]: type 4, range 32, base dcf0, size 4, enabled
map[18]: type 4, ran
ds10# newfs /dev/md0c
fstab: /etc/fstab:0: No such file or directory
/dev/md0c: 1.4MB (2880 sectors) block size 4096, fragment size 512
using 4 cylinder groups of 0.36MB, 91 blks, 192 inodes.
super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
32, 760, 1488, 2216
ds10# fsck -n /dev/md0c
fstab: /etc/fs
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
Because of "device cloning"; devices are created on demand.
"device cloning" is really a wrong name for this, and I regret that
I every used that term. "On demand device creation" is closer,
but it doesn't have any
Hi all,
I just cvsup updated my tree (this is FreeBSD CURRENT, 5.0), and make
buildworld breaks with:
...
cc -O -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1
-I/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/../arch/i386 -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/../common
-c /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/tree.c
cc -O -pipe -I.
-CURRENT as of this week-end on a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop.
During desktop use :
panic: bremfree: removing a buffer not on a queue
panic messages:
---
panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???
syncing disks, buffers remaining... panic: bremfree: removing a buffer not on a queue
Uptime: 9h18m39s
Dumpi
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, John Hay wrote:
:>>
:>> As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless
:>> started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same
:>> and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the problem.
:>>
:>> We use PXE as
< said:
> What to do, if, say, C99 program want to use some POSIX functions from
> lower (and not from higher) POSIX standard?
Programmer error. Either it's a C99 program or it's an old-POSIX
program; it cannot be both.
> #define _GNU_SOURCE 1
> #define _ISOC99_SOURCE 1
> #define _POSIX_C_SO
>
> As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless
> started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same
> and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the problem.
>
> We use PXE as bootstrap environment, isc-dhcp and a read-only
Another panic in tcp_input while exiting gtk-gnutella.
Script started on Wed Mar 12 00:38:24 2003
melati# gdb -k kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.1
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welco
Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:49:43 -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > > 1) Any _POSIX_C_SOURCE with _ISOC99_SOURCE. It is from real life example
> > > (ImageMagick). It wants lower POSIX level, *but* wants _ISOC99_SOURCE in
> > > the same time.
> >
> > I
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 17:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
[snip]
> "device cloning" is really a wrong name for this, and I regret that
> I every used that term. "On demand device creation" is closer,
> but it doesn't have any sort of ring to it.
... but "device on demand" does have a ring to it :)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:49:43 -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > 1) Any _POSIX_C_SOURCE with _ISOC99_SOURCE. It is from real life example
> > (ImageMagick). It wants lower POSIX level, *but* wants _ISOC99_SOURCE in
> > the same time.
>
> I don't like this at all. The meaning of _ANSI_SOURCE is t
On 10-Mar-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier writes:
>>
>>diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2)
>>
>>errors out with:
>>
>>diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
>>diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory
>>
>>Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes
Hello,
> Yes, I just got this myself today. I overlooked that devstat is not
> locked when I moved the devstat to geom_disk. Expect a patch tonight.
Great, thanks!
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [
Hey All,
I've a -CURRENT box that was cvsup'd yesterday. It's a backup file server
with a RAID array attached. This was a -STABLE machine at one point that
I updated. The last few messages in /var/log/messages before the panic
looked like this:
Mar 10 15:44:34 alvin kernel: isp0: bad underrun
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
>Because of "device cloning"; devices are created on demand.
"device cloning" is really a wrong name for this, and I regret that
I every used that term. "On demand device creation" is closer,
but it doesn't have any sort of ring to it.
--
Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, I don't quite understand, which one part you mean? My patch handles
> 2 following cases:
>
> 1) Any _POSIX_C_SOURCE with _ISOC99_SOURCE. It is from real life example
> (ImageMagick). It wants lower POSIX level, *but* wants _ISOC99_SOURCE in
> th
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:41:54PM +0100, Flag_reda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:14:08PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Try "ls -l /dev/bpf0" instead, etc. Beware of DEVFS surprises. :-)
>
> It works
>
> But, why it works like this?!?!?
>
> /me confused =P
>
Because of "devi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Attila Nagy wri
tes:
>Hello,
>
>I updated from an older CURRENT to a newer one and I am now getting a
>dozen
>kernel: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for da1 is < 0(-1)!
>messages every seconds during disk activity.
Yes, I just got this myself today. I o
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:14:08PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Try "ls -l /dev/bpf0" instead, etc. Beware of DEVFS surprises. :-)
It works
But, why it works like this?!?!?
/me confused =P
--
Paolo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:44:34 -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Many programs (from ports too) defines _ISOC99_SOURCE to get C99
> > functions, but we don't sense this define currently. Here is the fix for
> > review:
>
> Cool. I didn't realize t
After cvsup/rebuild today at about 14:00GMT I now get a
'page fault while in kernel mode' just after the system
tries to mount the rootfs.
Yesterday's kernel still works fine, and the filesystem
came up clean, so I guess the new kernel didn't get far
enough to write anything to disk.
To Unsubscribe
Hello.
As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless
started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same
and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the problem.
We use PXE as bootstrap environment, isc-dhcp and a read-only disk
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:07:04PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
>
> Added device bpf to my kernel config file, make a buildkenel&installkernel,
> rebooted but there's not bpf in /dev:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ grep bpf /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOUTHCROSS
> device bpf # Berkele
Added device bpf to my kernel config file, make a buildkenel&installkernel,
rebooted but there's not bpf in /dev:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ grep bpf /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOUTHCROSS
device bpf # Berkeley packet filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ uname -a
FreeBSD southcross.skyne
Added device bpf to my kernel config file, make a buildkenel&installkernel,
rebooted but there's not bpf in /dev:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ grep bpf /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOUTHCROSS
device bpf # Berkeley packet filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ uname -a
FreeBSD southcross.skyne
Added device bpf to my kernel config file, make a buildkenel&installkernel,
rebooted but there's not bpf in /dev:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ grep bpf /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOUTHCROSS
device bpf # Berkeley packet filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flag]$ uname -a
FreeBSD southcross.skyne
Hello,
I updated from an older CURRENT to a newer one and I am now getting a
dozen
kernel: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for da1 is < 0(-1)!
messages every seconds during disk activity.
Any ideas about what happening? da1 is on a sym adapter:
sym0: <1010-66> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
0x
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x20
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01c5a96
stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd316a98
frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd316abc
code segment= base 0x0,
67 matches
Mail list logo
