In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:20:40PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: > top -S shows the following on my machine:
: >
: > CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 80.3% system, 12.9% interrupt, 6.1% idle
: >
: > PID
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: * Add bus_child_present check to calls to *_stop in the detach method for
: devices that have children (i.e. miibus).
bus_child_present isn't quite right for this. bus_child_present means
"this child is still th
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Michael W . Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi folks,
:
: I picked up a couple of no-name Prism III cards, and found that
: FreeBSD-current doesn't recognize them. Is there anything I can do to
: make these work? (Up to and including shipping a c
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:54:16AM -0500, taxman wrote:
> that gives an error that is similiar to:
> WARNING: syntax error on file /boot/loader.conf
> dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
> ^
Hi Tim,
Please do 'dumpdev="/dev/ad0s1b". The doube quotes is a must .
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, th
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:54 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 March 2003 at 13:35:28 +, Jason Morgan wrote:
> > I just got a panic. As I have never had one before, I don't know what to
> > do. It's on another system so I don't have to reboot immediately (that
> > would solv
Fred
The via82c686.c code changed this week to implement the cold reset described
in the AC97 r2.3 spec since there are some boards where the former
initialization does not work. It may be your board is reporting it's ready,
but it requires a reset. Can you apply the attached patch to the he
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:20:40PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> top -S shows the following on my machine:
>
> CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 80.3% system, 12.9% interrupt, 6.1% idle
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
>11 root -160
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anish Mistry wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I finally got -CURRENT to install on my laptop as of 2003-03-25 and have
>been playing around with the acpi code trying to figure it out. One of the
>main problems is to get my USB bus to wake up after a suspend, currently all
>the U
Hi,
I finally got -CURRENT to install on my laptop as of 2003-03-25 and have
been playing around with the acpi code trying to figure it out. One of the
main problems is to get my USB bus to wake up after a suspend, currently all
the USB devices dies when suspended and resumed.
How can I tell
Hello again,
I just tried reverting (sys/dev/sound/pci/) via8233.c to 1.7,
via82c686.c to 1.22 and via82c686.h to 1.5 and the sound works again.
These are the revisions of those files prior to the lastest ones.
Fred
--
"Everyone has a scheme for getting rich that will not work."
pgp
I forgot to mention that the "old kernel" was built off source of
03/26, around mid-night GMT-3.
Fred
--
Insults for obnoxious people:
I'm not being rude. You're just insignificant...
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
[EMA
Hello,
Since my last kernel build (sources of 03/27, about 15:00 GMT-3), my
-CURRENT box detects the soundcard OK, esd starts fine and mpg123
"prentends" to be playing soundfiles correctly, only no sound will
come out. Booting the previous kernel guarantees it's not hardware's
fault, bec
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:43:17 -0700
> From: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Orion Hodson wrote:
> > Kevin Oberman writes:
> > |
> > | After upgrading my laptop from STABLE to CURRENT on 3/14 I have been
> > | having problems with GnomeMeeting. Often the sound is badly broken with
> > | 'spu
I have made the following updates and these should be the versions that
will be committed (modulo any bugs people may find).
* Move bus_setup_intr to after ether_ifattach. This removes the need for
any locking in *_attach because interrupts, even if shared, will not be
delivered until *_intr is h
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:27:06PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:55:22AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > Several ports have become broken recently with the following error:
> >
> > ../../../include/osg/Math:149: `isnan' undeclared (first use this function)
> >
> > http
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:31:48PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > stat.h:
> > $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/stat.h,v 1.34 2003/03/14 16:09:48 mike Exp $
>
> I think I see the problem. I'll try to get a fix committed by
> tonight.
Still appears to be broken with r1.35:
http://bento.freebsd.org/er
The problem was bind9, even though I thought it was bugging before the
install of it. The host(1) who comes with bind9 doesnt work the way that the
one in base does. Crap :(
Erik.
> Hi, I'm trying to get host working properly with ipv6 on
> 5.0-RELEASE-p6.
>
> Example:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname
I would like to include a kernel config file in another, as is done with
the SMP config file and how it includes the GENERIC config file. When
I try this with including any config file other than GENERIC, I get a
syntax error. IS GENERIC the only config that can be included or am I
doing somethin
Hi, I'm trying to get host working properly with ipv6 on 5.0-RELEASE-p6.
Example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -sr
-[~]-[11:06PM]-
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host 6bone.net
-[~]-[11:06PM]-
6bone.net has address 206.123.31.124
6bone.net has address 3ffe:b00:c18:1::10
6bone.net mail is han
Hi,
Not sure what happened to the original message, sorry for the noise!
I am running a recent current:
FreeBSD opal.macaroon.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Mar 26 16:18:16 GMT
2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
The machine is a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop. It
:My curiousity has overcome my fear of the bikeshed so I'll ask the
:question that has been bugging me for a while. Why haven't we gone
:through the tree and created a lock for each spl and then converted every
:spl call into the appropriate mtx_lock call? At that point, we can mark
:large secti
My curiousity has overcome my fear of the bikeshed so I'll ask the
question that has been bugging me for a while. Why haven't we gone
through the tree and created a lock for each spl and then converted every
spl call into the appropriate mtx_lock call? At that point, we can mark
large sections of
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 12:24, Steve Sizemore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:09:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Steve Sizemore wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP
> > > > has been
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:09:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Steve Sizemore wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP
> > > has been "I have an old Linux install that can't talk TCP, as
> > > o
--- John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > | > There is a calibration step in the driver to
> determine the clock rate of th
> > | e
> > | > AC97 link. What you are seeing is the
> calibration step failing and setting
> > | a
> > | > bogus ac97 link rate. I took a cursory look a
> coupl
>
> | > There is a calibration step in the driver to determine the clock rate of th
> | e
> | > AC97 link. What you are seeing is the calibration step failing and setting
> | a
> | > bogus ac97 link rate. I took a cursory look a couple of weeks back and it
> | > smelt like the timecounter in
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
The netgraph module fails to build. Could you please take a look at that
(and connect it to the build)?
/sys/modules/netgraph/fec
Thanks,
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fr
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:24:44AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 March 2003 at 13:35:28 +, Jason Morgan wrote:
> > I just got a panic. As I have never had one before, I don't know what to
> > do. It's on another system so I don't have to reboot immediately (that
> > would
My bitty box just crashed out while doing some light desktop work and a
small amount of NFS server stuff.
The source was cvsup'd a few minutes before the kernel was compiled last
Sunday. The contents of dmesg.boot are include below.
If it's of any use, the machine crashed badly the day before ye
Hi folks,
I picked up a couple of no-name Prism III cards, and found that
FreeBSD-current doesn't recognize them. Is there anything I can do to
make these work? (Up to and including shipping a card to a
committer?)
Mar 27 07:14:35 pedicular kernel: pccard1: (manufacturer=0x50c2,
product=0x730
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:30:04AM -0600, Aaron Wohl wrote:
> How can I convince the amanda backup system to use -L when running dumps
> so it can take advantage of using snapshots? I checked all the amanda
> web man pages abd FAQ system but didnt see anything on snapshoting or
> giving extra opt
Hello,
dmesg give me a lot of messages like this:
Stack backtrace:
malloc() of "128" with the following non-sleepablelocks held:
exclusive sleep mutex netisr lock r = 0 (0xc04777e0) locked @
/usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:215
malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepablelocks held:
exclusive slee
How can I convince the amanda backup system to use -L when running dumps
so it can take advantage of using snapshots? I checked all the amanda
web man pages abd FAQ system but didnt see anything on snapshoting or
giving extra options to dump.
___
[EMAI
How can I convince the amanda backup system to use -L when running dumps
so it can take advantage of using snapshots? I checked all the amanda
web man pages abd FAQ system but didnt see anything on snapshoting or
giving extra options to dump.
___
[EMAIL
/-- Scott Long wrote:
| Orion Hodson wrote:
| > There is a calibration step in the driver to determine the clock rate of th
| e
| > AC97 link. What you are seeing is the calibration step failing and setting
| a
| > bogus ac97 link rate. I took a cursory look a couple of weeks back and it
| >
Steve Sizemore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP
> > has been "I have an old Linux install that can't talk TCP, as
> > only UDP was implemented at the time I installed it".
>
> Have you alread
37 matches
Mail list logo
