- message from Garrett Cooper -
> > I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I
> > created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h':
> >
> > # cat freebsd10.h
> > #include "freebsd9.h"
> > #define freebsd8 freebsd8
> >
> > +Cc: maintainer
>
> You'll need to do more than
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:51:10PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 08:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:40:08AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >>On 11/02/2011 05:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>[restored cc: to the original poster]
> >>>As Bruce Evans has pointed to me privatel
Hello,
ports/devel/libnotify (requested by www/firefox36) does not build in
10-CURRENT (ports uptodate to November 3 from CVS):
# make
...
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for PACKAGE... yes
checking for TESTS...
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 07:49:52AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 11/03/11 23:48, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:17:08PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >> I realised something weird in FreeBSD 10.-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG
> >> compiled), build as from today (buildworld
В Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:22:28 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson пишет:
> When the x server is down at 20% is it laggy?
In different ways, but basically - yes.
Sometimes appear in Xorg.0.log messages like:
"[mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop."
When I run a lot of programs
2011/11/4 Daniel O'Connor
>
> On 19/10/2011, at 21:19, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> > I can't specify to pkg_add that it should treat /zpool0/testroot as
> root, as
> > I need (so record really should be @cwd /usr/local)
> > Instead, pkg_add allows me to make chroot, which as you understand is not
Hello,
ports/graphics/gphoto2 is missing a lot of libs which should be
installed by ports/graphics/libgphoto2:
# make
===> gphoto2-2.4.11 depends on executable: gmake - found
===> gphoto2-2.4.11 depends on shared library: popt.0 - found
===> gphoto2-2.4.11 depends on shared library: gphoto
ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
does not build:
caracas# pwd
/usr/ports/security/p11-kit
caracas# make
===> Building for p11-kit-0.8
...
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for shared libr
Maybe useful the following information:
This problem appears not to all architectures and types of CPU.
on the Russian forums
http://www.bsdportal.ru/viewtopic.php?t=24900
http://forum.lissyara.su/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=34641&sid=aa596f0b70806ba053011da911f9ccae
was a brute force to find out that:
th
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 07:05:54PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nima Misaghian
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have got code developed by Andre Albsmeier that is capable of
> > programming firmware of hard drives from several vendors and ?turned
> > it into a camco
On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 19/10/2011, at 21:19, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>> I can't specify to pkg_add that it should treat /zpool0/testroot as root, as
>> I need (so record really should be @cwd /usr/local)
>> Instead, pkg_add allows me to make chroot, which as y
On 11/04/2011 05:08, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:51:10PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/03/2011 08:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:40:08AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/02/2011 05:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[restored cc: to the original poster]
As Bruce E
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:09:09AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 05:08, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:51:10PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >>I would suggest introducing the vm_page_bits_t change first. If, at the
> >>same time, you change the return type from the functi
On 11/04/2011 10:30, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:09:09AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/04/2011 05:08, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:51:10PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
I would suggest introducing the vm_page_bits_t change first. If, at the
same time, you ch
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:48:45AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 10:30, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > for (b = i = 0; i<= PAGE_SIZE / DEV_BSIZE; ++i) {
> > if (i == (PAGE_SIZE / DEV_BSIZE) ||
> >-(m->valid& (1<< i))
> >+(m->valid& ((vm_page_b
On 29 Oct 2011 00:38, "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" wrote:
>
> >> The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use
> >> extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this.
> >
> >I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too
> >large to not make p
Hello
I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance with
netmap ,
since I am currently using freebsd as core routers instead of cisco.
I tried to re-compile the freebsd 8.2 kernel to test ,
however , I could not complete the task ( both i386 and amd64 ),
I could only success
>>
>>To me, the only difference between borking a drive because of
>> bad firmware and typing "rm -rf *" from root is about £40. You still
>> lose at least a day rebuilding/restoring everything.
>>
>
>You clearly haven't bought a hard drive recently.
>
>Chris
Laughs!
Yea, trus
On 4 Nov 2011 16:33, "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" wrote:
>
> >>
> >>To me, the only difference between borking a drive because of
> >> bad firmware and typing "rm -rf *" from root is about £40. You still
> >> lose at least a day rebuilding/restoring everything.
> >>
> >
> >You clearly haven't boug
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Archy Cho wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance with
> netmap ,
> since I am currently using freebsd as core routers instead of cisco.
>
> I tried to re-compile the freebsd 8.2 kernel to test ,
> however , I could not com
I suspect I'm building on a system that's too old, but it's worth
asking.
FreeBSD eyeball.lodden.com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 29
00:31:14 EDT 2009
mwlu...@stretchlimo.blackhelicopters.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
csup today. no /etc/src.conf, /etc/make.conf on
On 11/04/11 14:26, Matthias Apitz wrote:
ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
does not build:
caracas# pwd
/usr/ports/security/p11-kit
caracas# make
===> Building for p11-kit-0.8
...
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/l
El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch
escribió:
> > ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
> > does not build:
> >
>
> Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially:
>
> 20110928:
>AFFECTS: users of 10-current
-- Forwarded message --
From: Archy Cho
Date: 2011/11/5
Subject: Re: Netmap for routers (em0 device)
To: Vlad Galu
Do you know about time line for this ? Thanks.
2011/11/5 Vlad Galu
> On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Archy Cho wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I am very happy to see freeb
-- Forwarded message --
From: Archy Cho
Date: 2011/11/5
Subject: Re: Netmap for routers (em0 device)
To: Jack Vogel
undefined 'j' appears on FreeBSD 8.2 release ( both i386 and amd64 tested
),
I could compile netmap to a 9.0-RC-1 box with disabling re/bge.
2011/11/5 Jack Vogel
On 11/04/11 20:35, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch
escribió:
ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
does not build:
Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially:
20110928:
AFFE
-- Forwarded message --
From: Archy Cho
Date: 2011/11/5
Subject: Re: Netmap for routers (em0 device)
To: Darren Pilgrim
2011/11/5 Darren Pilgrim
> On 2011-11-04 09:06, Archy Cho wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance
>> wit
El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:49:10PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch
escribió:
> > WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1
> >
> > and most of the ports I'm using are compiling now; the port mentioned
> > here does not (not even with UNAME_r) and I wanted to bring this to the
> > attention of the maintainer and
With NETMAP patch
I know there has no errors for default.
2011/11/5 Jack Vogel
> I looked at the if_em.c in a untouched 8.2 machine, there is no 'j' at
> line 4012,
> furthermore, hundreds of users of 8.2 have compiled the em driver without
> errors,
> the release would not have happened with a
With NETMAP patch
I know there has no errors for default.
source from info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/*netmap*/
thank you.
2011/11/5 Archy Cho
> With NETMAP patch
> I know there has no errors for default.
>
>
> 2011/11/5 Jack Vogel
>
>> I looked at the if_em.c in a untouched 8.2 machine, there is no '
After getting in contact with clang's ml, the determined that this a bug in
clang's format checker.
Note that this bug affects:
printf("%hu\n", ntohs(x));
This happens in 9 that ntohs is defined as a macro using conditinal operator
(? :)
The discussion is here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.e
31 matches
Mail list logo
