Den 01/05/2012 kl. 15.55 skrev Gary Palmer:
>
> If you want a high-level view of what goes on run
>
> ldd `which ls`
>
> check that it has libraries to load and doesn't say "not a dynamic ELF
> executable", and then run:
>
> ktrace ls
> kdump | more
>
> All the system calls related to resolvi
it somewhere
> and send a link?
nope, my fault, i forgot to put the attachment. I have now put it at
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/20120501-netmap_drop.diff
cheers
luigi
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 1. May 2012, at 15:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
>>> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether
Al 30/04/2012 21:34, En/na Jason Evans ha escrit:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
the kde team is seeing some strange problems with the new version (4.8.1) of
devel/dbus-qt4 with current. It does work with stable. I also suspect that the
problem described below is a
I read this week this article on Phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_r600g_llvm&num=1
Well, it looks promising to me in terms of having also OpenCL
capabilities for GPGPU, but as the report says, the code is not finished
and still in a very preliminary stage.
What is
On May 1, 2012, at 11:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
>>> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
> > were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
> >
> > In particular, from the beginning
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
>
> In particular, from the beginning of ether_output() to the
> final call to ether_output_frame() the code takes slight
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 01/05/2012 kl. 07.52 skrev Tim Kientzle:
> >
> > On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> >>
> >> Can anyone explain to me why the dynamically linked version is
> >> significantly slower? What are the extra ste
Den 01/05/2012 kl. 07.52 skrev Tim Kientzle:
>
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone explain to me why the dynamically linked version is significantly
>> slower? What are the extra steps involved compared to a statically linked
>> binary?
>
> At the risk of dr
Am 04/30/12 13:44, schrieb Jean-Sébastien Pédron:
> On 30.04.2012 08:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Repeating the build ends up at the same "stage" as it stopped when
>> building on regular basis - for my understanding.
>
> You say you have two boxes running 10-CURRENT: do they run the same
> SVN revis
11 matches
Mail list logo
