Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org writes:
If I'm understanding things correctly, the maxswzone value -- set by the
kern.maxswzone loader tunable or to VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX by default -- should
be approximately 9 MiB per GiB of swap space.
Far less, in fact. As mentioned in loader(8), the
Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com writes:
What about this patch? It enables to ratelimit the printf.
I have a different patch that just prints one message when swzone is
exhausted and another when more space becomes available. However, we
might want to combine the two, so that it periodically
Slightly better patch (improved documentation)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Index: sys/boot/common/loader.8
===
--- sys/boot/common/loader.8 (revision 239239)
+++ sys/boot/common/loader.8 (working copy)
@@ -613,17
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:30:06PM +0200, Pierre DAVID wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 05:49:24PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build a NanoBSD image for Soekris net4801 with a recent
-CURRENT. The kernel boots fine but when it comes to mounting the root
filesystem,
On 08/13/12 14:23, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-Aug-12 15:44:07 -0700, Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org
wrote:
If I'm understanding things correctly, the maxswzone value -- set by
the kern.maxswzone loader tunable or to VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX by default --
should be approximately 9 MiB per GiB
http://privatepaste.com/147286442b
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 08:34 -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
Michael,
Something in -current and recently MFC'd to -stable is causing all of my
gmirror drives to rebuild on reboot :-(
Being remote and these being production machines, I suspect SVN r237929
and r237930 in -current and SVN
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
I Jul 22 08:54:25 brane kernel: pf: state key linking mismatch! dir=OUT, if=
I tun0, stored af=2, a0: 10.0.2.220:60985, a1: 192.41.162.30:53, proto=17,
I found af=2, a0: 41.154.2.53:1701, a1: 41.133.165.161:59051, proto=17.
Let me give you link to my branch of pf:
Hi,
I just upgraded my system from r238261 to r239244 and was unable to boot
one of my zfs root systems. I had to recover using the zfsloader.old
that is kept in /boot. The messages from zfsloader were:
ZFS: can't find pool by guid
ZFS: can't find pool by guid
can't load 'kernel'
followed by a
On 14.08.2012 21:03, Steve Wills wrote:
Any ideas if this is a bug or something wrong with my system would be
appreciated.
Can you boot with serial console and show what show the `lsdev` command
in the loader?
And from the running system the output of `gpart show` and
`zpool status`.
--
WBR,
Hello, Current.
I'm using Soekris net5501 (AMD Geode 500Mhz, 512MiB of RAM) as
all-in-one home router: it connects my network to ISP via PPPoE
(40Mbit shaped channel, ng0, over 100Mbit ethernet, interface vr1) and acts as
AP for my
WiFi (Atheros card). It connected to my wired
Hello, Current.
It looks like I've got live lock on my router. It acts as router,
but physical console (serial one) and ssh connection are stalled and
don't react on keypresses. After two or three minutes everything
unfreeze, then freeze again...
After unfreeze here are messages from nut
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 0:51:03:
LS It looks like I've got live lock on my router. It acts as router,
LS but physical console (serial one) and ssh connection are stalled and
LS don't react on keypresses. After two or three minutes everything
LS unfreeze, then freeze
Hi,
Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture
some KTR scheduler dumps?
That way the scheduler peeps can feed this into schedgraph.py (and you
can too!) to figure out what's going on.
Maybe things aren't being scheduled correctly and the added latency is
killing
On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture
some KTR scheduler dumps?
That way the scheduler peeps can feed this into schedgraph.py (and you
can too!) to figure out what's going on.
Maybe things aren't being
Sites that are based on frames or iframes (such as google mail and
most of google's non-search services) kill the performance of
www/firefox [firefox-14.0.1_1,1] (last updated yesterday on a 9.1
built at the same time) here is the uname:
FreeBSD XXX 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2: Thu
16 matches
Mail list logo
