On 12/03/12 20:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Hi all,
I have just imported llvm/clang 3.2 RC2 into head, in r243830. The 3.2
release will happen soon, in approximately two weeks. I do not expect
any significant changes anymore, though.
As usual, please report any strangeness or new bugs to
Hi
I've just had this card installed in our servers:
ix0@pci0:12:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
04.12.2012 13:25, O. Hartmann пишет:
On the boxes using FBSD 10.0-CUR and LibreOffice 3.5.7 as in the ports,
after the update, the rebuild of the world (at FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1
r243836M: Mon Dec 3 23:47:54 CET 2012), an attempt starting LibreOffice
ends up in a SIGNAL 10:
pid 95059
Hello all.
I had some spare time so i thought it was a good moment to look at
auditdistd .
One thing i noticed was the default config file location.
The man page and the wiki tells me it is /etc/security/auditdistd
I enabled audistd by placing the following in the rc.conf file
If there is indeed some problem with libreoffice, I will report back
after MFC :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/HEADS-UP-Imported-llvm-clang-3-2-RC2-into-head-tp5766354p5766507.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Look again closely, AFBR-703SDZ-IN2 and AFBR-703SDDZ-IN1 are supported,
AFBR-703SDZ-IN is not.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za wrote:
Hi
I've just had this card installed in our servers:
ix0@pci0:12:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x7a118086
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:41:32 +0200, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please try the patch below. It might give an immediate relief, but still
there are many offenders in the backtrace.
Thanks for the patch, it works now.
___
On Sunday, November 04, 2012 2:53:02 pm Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 22.10.2012 15:28, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:11:10 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
What's keeping kernel modules from building in parallel with
make -j8?
They don't for you? They do for me either via
On Friday, November 23, 2012 5:56:02 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
Thanks for this!
I'm sorry it hasn't gotten any more attention. I've cc'ed john because
he understands the PCI-PCI resource allocation stuff and I currently
don't; I'm hoping he can stare at this and see what's going on.
But yes,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
of
the make jobs may not be as obvious since links are silent (no output
unless
there is an error).
This is definitely not the behaviour that I
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks
for DMA into one central function. This change is a precursor to adding
new features to the I/O stack. It is mostly mechanical. If you are
running current on a raid or scsi
[ replying to an old thread, sorry ]
On Nov 3, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 4 ноября 2012 г., 2:12:03:
AY Quick glance to nanobsd give me impression that:
AY 1) nanobsd is MBR based, so :
AY 2) nanobsd is disk-name-change sensitive.
Here are
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks for
DMA into one central function. This change is a precursor to adding new
features to the I/O stack. It is mostly
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 14:49 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks
for DMA into one central function. This change is a precursor
2012/12/4 Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com
[ replying to an old thread, sorry ]
On Nov 3, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 4 ноября 2012 г., 2:12:03:
AY Quick glance to nanobsd give me impression that:
AY 1) nanobsd is MBR based, so :
AY 2) nanobsd
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 14:49 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks for
DMA into one central
On 12/4/2012 1:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
looks ok for isp. This doesn't do diddly for target mode- do you know
off the top of your head if it will break anything there?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 14:49 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that
On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:18 PM, Matthew Jacob m...@feral.com wrote:
On 12/4/2012 1:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
looks ok for isp. This doesn't do diddly for target mode- do you know off the
top of your head if it will break anything there?
It
Jack Vogel wrote:
Look again closely, AFBR-703SDZ-IN2 and AFBR-703SDDZ-IN1 are supported,
AFBR-703SDZ-IN is not.
Sorry, that was a cutpasto. We have the AFBR-703SDZ-IN2.
The full detail from the box according the guy on site is:
AFBR-703SDZ-IN2 (INTEL)FTLX8571D3BCL
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
20 matches
Mail list logo
