I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
On 31 July 2014 14:41, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at
------
From:kradkra...@gmail.com;
Date:2014??8??1??(??) 3:39
To:Gleb Smirnoffgleb...@freebsd.org;
Cc:freebsd-currentfreebsd-current@freebsd.org;FreeBSD
Questionsfreebsd-questi...@freebsd.org;
Subject:Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
------
From:kradkra...@gmail.com;
Date:2014??8??1??(??) 3:39
To:Gleb Smirnoffgleb...@freebsd.org;
Cc:freebsd-currentfreebsd-current@freebsd.org;FreeBSD
Questionsfreebsd-questi...@freebsd.org;
Subject:Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
July 31 2014 2:41 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
No. I believe pf should be removed from FreeBSD and efforts refocused
on keeping ipfw up to date and feature complete. It makes more sense to
look at what pf, ipf, nbtables, etc. are all doing as a source of ideas
for what we can do with ipfw. A
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 530, Issue 5, Message: 1
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:02:22 +1000 Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 07/29/14 20:35, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Mike. wrote:
M | imho, the root problem here is that an
On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:46, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
I personally use pf for many reasons, spamd included. I don't think anyone
out there is interested in forking spamd to play ball with ipfw so we would
also be alienating these users who can't just change packet filters. Is there
After the unbound update - or coinciding this update in CURRENT - I have
massive and
disturbing problems connecting to some sites, email servers and even the SVN
server of
FreeBSD (ports and src).
For some name resoltions I receive
Host xxx.xxx.de not found: 2(SERVFAIL), while another domain
Am 01.08.2014 um 18:25 schrieb O. Hartmann:
After the unbound update - or coinciding this update in CURRENT - I have
massive and
disturbing problems connecting to some sites, email servers and even the SVN
server of
FreeBSD (ports and src).
For some name resoltions I receive
Host
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:22:27PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
Jan,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
At the console, depressing and holding a key does not lead to auto-repeat.
At the console, sometimes a key
Hi!
On 1 August 2014 11:18, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:22:27PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
Jan,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
At the console, depressing and holding a
Cy Schubert wrote this message on Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:18 -0700:
In message CAJ-Vmo=_vLkMZn02EPUmpvqugcT8ga1_Kqs=XU49SGUNGEO0Pw@mail.gmail.c
om
, Adrian Chadd writes:
On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats
Hi,
Maybe this is a problem caused by a misdetected clock source? I've had
this problem as well.
I've appended the patch I've been using to fix this problem on this
Intel Core2Duo T6570 processor. There are some model IDs hardcoded in
the TSC detection code that enable TSC even though it's
Can you file a pr with this patch?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
That way we don't lose track of it.
Thanks!
-a
On 1 August 2014 11:48, Jan Kokemüller jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Maybe this is a problem caused by a misdetected clock source? I've had
this problem as well.
On 01.08.2014 20:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Can you file a pr with this patch?
Done:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192316
Cheers,
Jan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
So, I have a laptop that devd loads the bluetooth module every time..
This means I get the following error on every boot:
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
Is there any real benefit to this warning? I
So, I decided to play around w/ vt after the recent UTF-8 discussion,
and noticed some issues w/ it...
First, if you load the gallant font, things don't look very good... This
is probably because of the fact that I'm using the vga driver:
VT: running with driver vga.
and the default resolution
Just what I've got in January 2011:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
Svata
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:34 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
So, I have a laptop that devd loads the bluetooth module every time..
This means I get the
Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 00:05 +0200:
Just what I've got in January 2011:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
Sadly, after three (or six+) years, it is clear that these bugs will
not be fixed, and this warning message is
I'd just make it a panic. :)
-a
On 1 August 2014 15:21, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 00:05 +0200:
Just what I've got in January 2011:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd just make it a panic. :)
Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at runtime?
Marko
-a
On 1 August 2014 15:21, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message
On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd just make it a panic. :)
Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at runtime?
Well, why is it saying that? is there actually a problem?
-a
Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 16:25 -0700:
On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd just make it a panic. :)
Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at
On 1 August 2014 16:42, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 16:25 -0700:
On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd just make it a panic.
On 1 August 2014 17:18, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
So, I decided to play around w/ vt after the recent UTF-8 discussion,
and noticed some issues w/ it...
First, if you load the gallant font, things don't look very good... This
is probably because of the fact that I'm using the
On 8/1/14, 3:39 PM, krad wrote:
I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
since ipfw now has a 'nat' keyword you might say that is has
25 matches
Mail list logo
