There are a couple of similar issues currently. The other one that comes to
mind is that every X11 application that needs to use OpenGL (or similar) must
open /dev/dri/{something}, but the default permissions only permit root.
The correct solution is probably to ship a devfs.conf that puts thes
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:54:31 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
>
> On 09/16/14 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:09:01 -0700
> > Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
> >
> >> On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700
> >>> Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
>
On 09/17/14 08:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Soliciting help.
Forwarded Message
From my experience I think that cupsd executes backend tools with all uids and
gids set to cups and no supplementary groups. In the case of USB printers the
backends need to access /dev/usbctl and /d
Soliciting help.
Forwarded Message
>From my experience I think that cupsd executes backend tools with all uids and
gids set to cups and no supplementary groups. In the case of USB printers the
backends need to access /dev/usbctl and /dev/usb/foobar that corresponds to a
printe
On 09/16/14 22:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:35:19 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 09/16/14 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200
Maciej Milewski wrote:
On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
Nick Hibma wrote:
I've been getting this quite frequently on head recently. I have dumps
if anyone is interested in more information.
Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 10; Memory modified after free 0xf8003e0b0800(2040) val= @
0xf8003e0b0808
apanic: Most recentl
On 16 September 2014 18:54, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
> On 09/16/14 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> When the system boots, I do not see a loader! Where is the loader I'm used
>> to see when I
>> have the chance to switch to single user mode, console or switch off ACPI?
>
>
> There is no beastie me
On 16 September 2014 18:25, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Besides, checking both boot1.efi and loader.efi with file() shows something
> like
> loader.efi: PE32+ executable (EFI application) x86-64 (stripped to external
> PDB), for MS
> Windows. So both are PECOFF format files?
That is correct.
>>
>>
On 09/16/14 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:09:01 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
On 09/15/14 17:36, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
Installing F
On 17 Sep, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:06:36 +0100
> "Steven Hartland" schrieb:
>> All that said you shouldnt end up with corrupt data no matter
>> what.
>>
>> Are there any other symptoms? Has memory been checked for
>> faults etc?
>>
>> Regards
>> Steve
>
> The reason
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:06:36 +0100
"Steven Hartland" schrieb:
> > On of my backup drives dedicated to a ZPOOL is faulting and showing up
> > multiple ID.
> > The only working ID is id: 257822624560506537.
> >
> > FreeBSD CURRENT with three ZFS disks and only 4GB of RAM is very "flaky"
> > rega
Am Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:25:07 +0300
Andriy Gapon schrieb:
> On 17/09/2014 00:32, Ed Maste wrote:
> > On 16 September 2014 17:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >> In that case, is it still /boot/boot1.efifat or is it /boot/boot1.efi?
> >> What is the
> >> difference? Is the efi partition FAT?
> >
>
On 17/09/2014 00:32, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 17:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> In that case, is it still /boot/boot1.efifat or is it /boot/boot1.efi? What
>> is the
>> difference? Is the efi partition FAT?
>
> An EFI system partition (ESP) is a FAT-formatted partition with a
> speci
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:32:12 -0400
Ed Maste schrieb:
> On 16 September 2014 17:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > In that case, is it still /boot/boot1.efifat or is it /boot/boot1.efi? What
> > is the
> > difference? Is the efi partition FAT?
>
> An EFI system partition (ESP) is a FAT-formatted pa
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700
Adrian Chadd schrieb:
> Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers
> default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500.
>
>
> -a
It is not the jumbo frame that makes this specific NIC work, I have to set the
mtu
explicitely to
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:09:01 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
>
> On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700
> > Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
> >
> >> On 09/15/14 17:36, Allan Jude wrote:
> >>> On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Installing FreeBSD-11.0-
On 16 September 2014 17:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> In that case, is it still /boot/boot1.efifat or is it /boot/boot1.efi? What
> is the
> difference? Is the efi partition FAT?
An EFI system partition (ESP) is a FAT-formatted partition with a
specific GPT or MBR identifier and file system hierarc
On of my backup drives dedicated to a ZPOOL is faulting and showing up multiple
ID. The
only working ID is id: 257822624560506537.
FreeBSD CURRENT with three ZFS disks and only 4GB of RAM is very "flaky"
regarding this
issue: today, tow times the whole poolset vanishes after a reboot. Giving th
Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:36:23 -0400
Allan Jude schrieb:
> On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > Installing FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990 on a Laptop works
> > for UEFI
> > fine. After I updated the sources to r271649, recompiled world and kernel
> > (as well as
> > inst
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:09:01 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
>
> On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700
> > Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
> >
> >> On 09/15/14 17:36, Allan Jude wrote:
> >>> On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Installing FreeBSD-11.0-
On of my backup drives dedicated to a ZPOOL is faulting and showing up multiple
ID. The
only working ID is id: 257822624560506537.
FreeBSD CURRENT with three ZFS disks and only 4GB of RAM is very "flaky"
regarding this
issue: today, tow times the whole poolset vanishes after a reboot. Giving the
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:35:19 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 09/16/14 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200
> > Maciej Milewski wrote:
> >
> >> On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
> >>> Nick Hibma wrote:
> >>>
>
On 16.09.2014 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200
> Maciej Milewski wrote:
>
>> On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
>>> Nick Hibma wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272
On 09/16/14 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200
Maciej Milewski wrote:
On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
Nick Hibma wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272
card with CURRENT after 269584
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200
Maciej Milewski wrote:
> On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
> > Nick Hibma wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272
> >> card with CURRENT after 269584? I have no
On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
> Nick Hibma wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272
>> card with CURRENT after 269584? I have not been able to confirm that
>> it works.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Nick
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 22:27 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> > >
> > > I assume that there
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> >
> > I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> > as every one
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:15AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
>
> I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
> new messag
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:45 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:40, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
> >
> > I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> > as every one of my machin
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:40, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
>
> I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
> as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
> new message.
unam
HV_KVP: open /dev/hv_kvp_dev failed; error: 2 No such file or directory
I assume that there is missing error handling in or logic here somewhere
as every one of my machines is spamming my consoles on startup with this
new message.
sean
___
freebsd-curr
Hi,
I am planning to enable daily head build logs of ports to current@. The
idea is that only new regressions will generate 1 mail with a list of
failures. This list will only include *new* failures. It will not nag
every day if some port is still broken.
This will only work well if the ports tre
Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers
default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500.
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send an
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200
Nick Hibma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272
> card with CURRENT after 269584? I have not been able to confirm that
> it works.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Nick
>
Hi,
I did fresh svn update, rebuilt world+kern
Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700
Adrian Chadd schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Try updating to the latest -HEAD. It at least makes dhclient behave better.
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 15 September 2014 18:19, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Trying to
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:29:56PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:38:02 PM Patrick Kelsey wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > On 09.09.2014 21:53, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
> > > > I don't think it is worth the trouble, as given the la
On 16 Sep 2014, at 00:05 , O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Installing FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990 on a Laptop works for
> UEFI fine.
> After I updated the sources to r271649, recompiled world and kernel (as well
> as
> installed), now I get stuck with the screen message:
>
>>> FreeBS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:47:41PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> ?
>
> > Below is the patch which adds environment variable
> > LIBPTHREAD_BIGSTACK_MAIN. Setting it to any value results in the
> > main thread stack left as is, and othe
Hi,
Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272 card with
CURRENT after 269584? I have not been able to confirm that it works.
Thanks in advance.
Nick
The change:
Author: n_hibma
Date: Tue Aug 5 12:08:50 2014
New Revision: 269584
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changese
On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn schrieb:
On 09/15/14 17:36, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
Installing FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990 on a Laptop works for
UEFI
fine. After I updated the source
42 matches
Mail list logo
