Re: kernel -current build failures

2018-05-23 Thread Charlie Li
On 23/05/2018 19:21, Michael Butler wrote: > On a device with bluetooth (as in GENERIC modules) .. > > --- ng_ether.o --- > /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c:871:2: error: no member named > 'tqh_first' in 'struct ifnethead'; did you mean 'stqh_first'? > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifp, _ifnet, if_link)

Re: pciconf -l doesn't show any devices on Hyper-V VM

2018-05-23 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
Gen1 or Gen2? On Gen2 Hyper-V, there is _no_ pcib0 and pci0 at all; unless you uses pci-e pass-through or SR-IOV. Why do you care about the existence of pci bus? On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Hi, > > Running FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-amd64-20180514-r333606

Re: gcc/g++ 4.2.1 -r334125 is getting devd related build failures on ci.freebsd.org

2018-05-23 Thread Eitan Adler
I got this. not marked as spam On 23 May 2018 at 18:34, Mark Millard wrote: > [This submittal is in part an experiment with how Eitan's > MUA classifies the Email using an alternate yahoo.com > address. Eitan: the subject and this note are all unique > to this message.] > >

pciconf -l doesn't show any devices on Hyper-V VM

2018-05-23 Thread Yuri Pankov
Hi, Running FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-amd64-20180514-r333606 snapshot as a VM on Hyper-V, `pciconf -l` (and `lspci`, expected) doesn't return any information. Hyper-V Version: 10.0.14393 [SP2] (that's Windows 2016 with Hyper-V role). dmesg.boot is attached in case it's useful. Copyright (c)

kernel -current build failures

2018-05-23 Thread Michael Butler
On a device with bluetooth (as in GENERIC modules) .. --- ng_ether.o --- /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c:871:2: error: no member named 'tqh_first' in 'struct ifnethead'; did you mean 'stqh_first'? TAILQ_FOREACH(ifp, _ifnet, if_link) { ^ /usr/src/sys/sys/queue.h:724:15: note:

Re: Boot USB memstick with MBR (WAS: Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver)

2018-05-23 Thread Philip Homburg
I tried both FreeBSD-11.2-BETA2-amd64-bootonly.iso.xz and FreeBSD-11.2-BETA2-amd64-mini-memstick.img.xz on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 BIOS version 2.7.0. With both images, the USB stick is not recognized. For reference I tried an image for a random other OS and in that case the USB stick is

Re: Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD 12

2018-05-23 Thread Pete Wright
On 05/23/2018 00:41, David Pan wrote: Hi: how config the Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD 12?I installed FreeBSD 12 on my thinkpad t470p ,and can not drive the Intel Wireless Card. please help me fix that, I have this working on my end under both 12-current and

Re: Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD 12

2018-05-23 Thread Sean Bruno
On 05/23/18 01:41, David Pan wrote: > Hi: > how config the Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD > 12?I installed FreeBSD 12 on my thinkpad t470p ,and can not drive the Intel > Wireless Card. > please help me fix that, > > thx > David Pan > This seems to be a "iwm(4)"

Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

2018-05-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote: > >Also as the Moore's law curve flattens expect the life of these > >older, but not so old, machines to live quiet some time. I > >believe we are talking sandy bridge and earlier? If that is > >corret Sandy bridge is still a very

Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

2018-05-23 Thread Ed Maste
On 23 May 2018 at 05:48, Philip Homburg wrote: > > Turns out, you can't install FreeBSD using a USB stick image because the > BIOS only support MBR. No idea why MBR support was dropped for the USB images. We haven't "dropped" MBR support, and our amd64 memstick images

Boot USB memstick with MBR (WAS: Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver)

2018-05-23 Thread Johannes Lundberg
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Philip Homburg wrote: > >It's not that hard create a mbr based usb-stick. Far easier than to find a > >CD burner. > > 'Not hard' means > - undocumented. Or at least, if you start with release notes and install > instructions you

Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD 12

2018-05-23 Thread David Pan
Hi: how config the Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) on FreeBSD 12?I installed FreeBSD 12 on my thinkpad t470p ,and can not drive the Intel Wireless Card. please help me fix that, thx David Pan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

Re: UEFI equivalent of boot.config? (Was: Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver)

2018-05-23 Thread Toomas Soome
> On 23 May 2018, at 13:29, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > Hijacking a thread here, > >> Turns out, you can't install FreeBSD using a USB stick image because the >> BIOS only support MBR. No idea why MBR support was dropped for the USB >> images. >> >> In the end I had to find a CD burner, and

Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

2018-05-23 Thread Philip Homburg
>It's not that hard create a mbr based usb-stick. Far easier than to find a >CD burner. 'Not hard' means - undocumented. Or at least, if you start with release notes and install instructions you won't find it. - Probably only works if you already have a FreeBSD system. And if it is indeed

Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

2018-05-23 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Philip Homburg wrote: > >Also as the Moore's law curve flattens expect the life of these > >older, but not so old, machines to live quiet some time. I > >believe we are talking sandy bridge and earlier? If that is > >corret Sandy

UEFI equivalent of boot.config? (Was: Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver)

2018-05-23 Thread sthaug
Hijacking a thread here, > Turns out, you can't install FreeBSD using a USB stick image because the > BIOS only support MBR. No idea why MBR support was dropped for the USB images. > > In the end I had to find a CD burner, and after a couple of tries managed to > install from CD. On a somewhat

Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

2018-05-23 Thread Philip Homburg
>Also as the Moore's law curve flattens expect the life of these >older, but not so old, machines to live quiet some time. I >believe we are talking sandy bridge and earlier? If that is >corret Sandy bridge is still a very viable system. I noticed this lack of love for older systems recently.