Re: HEADSUP: panic: running without device atpic requires a local APIC on UEFI systems after 0b01d45783c3

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 8:48 PM Xin Li wrote: > On 2023-11-20 19:33, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:21 PM Xin Li > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It seems that the recent improvements of ACPI detection (e0f3dc82727f > > and 0b01d457

Re: HEADSUP: panic: running without device atpic requires a local APIC on UEFI systems after 0b01d45783c3

On 2023-11-20 19:33, Warner Losh wrote: On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:21 PM Xin Li > wrote: Hi, It seems that the recent improvements of ACPI detection (e0f3dc82727f and 0b01d45783c3) would leave the system in an unbootable state if the UEFI files are

Re: HEADSUP: panic: running without device atpic requires a local APIC on UEFI systems after 0b01d45783c3

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:21 PM Xin Li wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that the recent improvements of ACPI detection (e0f3dc82727f > and 0b01d45783c3) would leave the system in an unbootable state if the > UEFI files are not being updated at the same time of "make > installworld". At early boot the k

Re: HEADSUP: panic: running without device atpic requires a local APIC on UEFI systems after 0b01d45783c3

I have a patch cooking for this... I was almost done when I had to leave for karate. Warner On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, 6:21 PM Xin Li wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that the recent improvements of ACPI detection (e0f3dc82727f > and 0b01d45783c3) would leave the system in an unbootable state if the > UEFI

HEADSUP: panic: running without device atpic requires a local APIC on UEFI systems after 0b01d45783c3

Hi, It seems that the recent improvements of ACPI detection (e0f3dc82727f and 0b01d45783c3) would leave the system in an unbootable state if the UEFI files are not being updated at the same time of "make installworld". At early boot the kernel would panic with: panic: running without device

Re: db> reset -> panic: acquiring blockable sleep lock with spinlock or critical section held ...

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Mitchell Horne wrote: Hi Mitchell, On 11/16/23 18:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, I seem to remember changes related to that a while ago but my cache is miss for the actual change.  Are we suppoed to handle this case? It would be nice if "reset" would reset again the first

Re: db> reset -> panic: acquiring blockable sleep lock with spinlock or critical section held ...

On 11/16/23 18:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, I seem to remember changes related to that a while ago but my cache is miss for the actual change.  Are we suppoed to handle this case? It would be nice if "reset" would reset again the first time ... Hi Bjoern, This is still my fault, I am so

Re: How much survives an install/reboot cycle?

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 09:12:45AM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > > > On Nov 19, 2023, at 11:51 PM, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > How much of a running system's state survives a reboot? I used to think > > the answer was "nothing", but from time to time a second reboot behaves > > a little diff

Re: db> reset -> panic: acquiring blockable sleep lock with spinlock or critical section held ...

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:21:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to remember changes related to that a while ago but my cache > is miss for the actual change. Are we suppoed to handle this case? > > It would be nice if "reset" would reset again the first time ... We should perha

99132daf6f70 rc.d/ldconfig: Prepend rtld stdlib paths to ldconfig(32)_paths

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 08:48, Dima Panov wrote: > On 20.11.2023 06:48, Graham Perrin wrote: > >> … >> ldconfig: warning: /lib32: No such file or directory >> > > It is related to > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=99132daf6f70cb0cc969c555d3612547fa3cf1db Thanks. Also noted, at the wee