Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2024-06-04 Thread Rick Macklem
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:18 PM Alan Somers wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do > not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to >

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2024-06-04 Thread Alan Somers
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:52 PM John Hixson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > On 16/06/2022 15:56, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > > > On 24/01/2022 16:13, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > >

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2024-06-04 Thread John Hixson
> > Thank you for the message. I'm glad someone has the courage to take the > plunge. Smbfs is still very important to me. In a heterogeneous environment > it is still the most common way to share data between systems. > Are you planning the final version as a kernel module, or will the final >

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2024-06-04 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 04/06/2024 23:52, John Hixson wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 16/06/2022 15:56, Rick Macklem wrote: Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: On 24/01/2022 16:13, Rick Macklem wrote: [...] So, I think Mark and Yuri are correct and looking

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2024-06-04 Thread John Hixson
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 16/06/2022 15:56, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > > On 24/01/2022 16:13, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > So, I think Mark and Yuri are correct and looking at up to date

Re: gcc behavior of init priority of .ctors and .dtors section

2024-06-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 5/16/24 4:05 PM, Lorenzo Salvadore wrote: On Thursday, May 16th, 2024 at 20:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote: gcc13 from ports `# gcc ctors.c && ./a.out init 1 init 2 init 5 init 4 init 3 main fini 3 fini 4 fini 5 fini 2 fini 1` The above order is not expected. I think clang's one is

Re: bridge: no traffic with vnet (epair) beyond bridge device

2024-06-04 Thread FreeBSD User
Am Tue, 04 Jun 2024 09:36:38 +0200 Alexander Leidinger schrieb: > Am 2024-06-03 21:02, schrieb FreeBSD User: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running a dual socket NUMA CURRENT host (Fujitsu RX host) running > > several jails. Jails are > > attached to a bridge device (bridge1), the physical device on

Re: [Bug 269133] bnxt(4): BCM57416 - HWRM_CFA_L2_SET_RX_MASK command returned RESOURCE_ALLOC_ERROR error

2024-06-04 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:17 AM Gerrit Kühn wrote: > Am Tue, 28 May 2024 11:19:42 +0200 > schrieb Gerrit Kühn : > > > > Not sure if it will break your setup, but this already happened with > > > 13.2 (I cant recall the exact release). > > > I have two machines with onboard NICs (Supermicro

Re: [Bug 269133] bnxt(4): BCM57416 - HWRM_CFA_L2_SET_RX_MASK command returned RESOURCE_ALLOC_ERROR error

2024-06-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Am Tue, 28 May 2024 11:19:42 +0200 schrieb Gerrit Kühn : > > Not sure if it will break your setup, but this already happened with > > 13.2 (I cant recall the exact release). > I have two machines with onboard NICs (Supermicro H12SSL-CT mainboards) > running just fine. One is 13.3, the other

Re: [Bug 269133] bnxt(4): BCM57416 - HWRM_CFA_L2_SET_RX_MASK command returned RESOURCE_ALLOC_ERROR error

2024-06-04 Thread Santiago Martinez
Hi everyone, just to follow up. I have found something interesting, at the moment I'm focusing on the issue related to the creation and deletion of sub-interfaces that trigger ALLOC/MASK errors and bricks the NIC ( not completely as the other port keeps working, this card has 2x10G). I have

Re: bridge: no traffic with vnet (epair) beyond bridge device

2024-06-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Am 2024-06-03 21:02, schrieb FreeBSD User: Hello, I'm running a dual socket NUMA CURRENT host (Fujitsu RX host) running several jails. Jails are attached to a bridge device (bridge1), the physical device on that bridge is igb1 (i350 based NIC). The bridge is created via host's rc scripts,