Re: WITHOUT_CASPER ghost?

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:21:12AM -0800, Michael Dexter wrote: > On 2/23/24 9:13 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > Things are in a somewhat messy state. CASPER and CAPSICUM were moved to > > a new __REQUIRED_OPTIONS list, but the various bits still exist and > > there's even

Re: WITHOUT_CASPER ghost?

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:49:08PM -0800, Michael Dexter wrote: > All, > > The WITHOUT_CASPER build option was deprecated in main and 14-stable branches > but is still showing up and will trip up the build option survey: > > sh src/tools/tools/build_option_survey/listallopts.sh | grep CASPER >

Re: sanitizers broken (was RE: libc/libsys split coming soon) [errno in libsys: any analogy to __elf_aux_vector ?]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:16:30AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote on > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 02:03:09 UTC : > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:13AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:20:25PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:

Re: sanitizers broken (was RE: libc/libsys split coming soon)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:13AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:20:25PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > That's probably worth a shot. Static linking will work anyway because > > libc.a in effect embeds libsys to retain compatability. > Please do

Re: sanitizers broken (was RE: libc/libsys split coming soon)

; work for everything except static linking? > > -Dimitry > > > On 21 Feb 2024, at 21:00, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > TL;DR: you can work around this by adding -lsys to the link line and I > > aim to improve the situation soon. > > > > The sanitiz

Re: sanitizers broken (was RE: libc/libsys split coming soon)

izer::ReExec()) in > >>> archive /usr/lib/clang/17/lib/freebsd/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > > I think this is caused by the libsys split. > > Cheers, > Harti > > -Original Message- > Fro

Re: libc/libsys split coming soon

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 10:15:09AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On 2/2/24, Brooks Davis wrote: > > TL;DR: The implementation of system calls is moving to a seperate > > library (libsys). No changes are required to existing software (except > > to ensure that libsys is

Re: libc/libsys split coming soon

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 05:11:42PM +0100, Paul Floyd wrote: > > On 02/02/2024 23:31, Brooks Davis wrote: > > TL;DR: The implementation of system calls is moving to a seperate > > library (libsys). No changes are required to existing software (except > > to ensure tha

libc/libsys split coming soon

TL;DR: The implementation of system calls is moving to a seperate library (libsys). No changes are required to existing software (except to ensure that libsys is present when building custom disk images). Code: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/908 After nearly a decade of

Re: git repo port issues?

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:09:15PM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Jan 3, 2024, at 11:22???AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > Nothing about dates is centralized in git, but some server side checks > > could be implemented on CommitDate. IMO we should require that > > Co

Re: git repo port issues?

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:52:04PM +, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > Nothing about dates is centralized in git, but some server side checks > > could be implemented on CommitDate. IMO we should require that > > CommitDate be >= the prev

Re: git repo port issues?

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 07:13:35PM +, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/ > > The latest update to "main" is : > > authorYuri Victorovich 2023-01-03 14:49:38 + > committer Yuri Victorovich 2023-01-03 14:49:38 + > > I.e. A year old. Reading the commit

Re: building with llvm16 pkg fails in tests

On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:33:33PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:45:06PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > Hi, > > > > To save time on my Raspberry Pi I would like to build FreeBSD using a llvm > > pkg instead of llvm in the tree.

Re: building with llvm16 pkg fails in tests

On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:45:06PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > To save time on my Raspberry Pi I would like to build FreeBSD using a llvm > pkg instead of llvm in the tree. > > My /etc/make.conf: > WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes > LD=/usr/local/llvm16/bin/ld.lld > CC=/usr/local/llvm16/bin/clang

Re: RFC: MFC'ng a change to struct mount

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:00:02AM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > Since there seemed to be interest in it, I have MFC'd most of > the changes needed to run nfsd(8) in a vnet jail to stable/13. > > However, there is one change that *might* affect the VFS KAPI. > > I need to add a pointer

Re: Switching MK_ATM to no by default

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 08:38:35AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:34:10 +0100 > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > It's 2023 and I don't think that ATM have any users (but could be > > wrong hence the mail). > > Is everyone ok with switching MK_ATF to no

Re: Switching MK_ATM to no by default

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > Hello, > > It's 2023 and I don't think that ATM have any users (but could be > wrong hence the mail). > Is everyone ok with switching MK_ATF to no by default ? > This will stop installed sscop(1) and libngatm (Netgraph

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 09:19:47PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Mark Millard (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 > 12:10:18 -0800): > > > On Nov 9, 2022, at 11:58, Alexander Leidinger > > wrote: > > > >> Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 > >> 20:49:37 +0100): > >> > >>>

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 09:26:04PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 25.04.2022 um 21:18 schrieb Brooks Davis : > > Cross install is not supported. As you have seen, certain tools are > > bootstrapped on the build host and used during the install process

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 09:07:47PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > > getting into FreeBSD ARM64 I tried to compile a current system on a fast > AMD64 VM and > now I am somewhat stuck - no help using search engines and the like. > > 1st step: > > # checkout main aka 14-CURRENT

Re: buildworld failed

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:52:27PM -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > This would be fine, but should not be necessicary. The sys subdir should > > be created by AUTOOBJ. > > .OBJDIR should be (and is), not .OBJDIR/sys We've had support for r

Re: buildworld failed

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:56:19AM -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > > --- sys/abi_compat.c --- > > echo "#include " > sys/abi_compat.c > > sh: cannot create sys/abi_compat.c: No such file or directory > > *** [sys/abi_compat.c] Error code 2 > > > > make[4]: stopped in

Re: Problem compiling ports

bsd-ports ML.) > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:45:30 + > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > In the config for devel/llvm11, is BE_STANDARD enabled? If not, you > > won't have the web assembly backend. > > > > -- Brooks > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:24:45P

Re: Problem compiling ports

In the config for devel/llvm11, is BE_STANDARD enabled? If not, you won't have the web assembly backend. -- Brooks On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:24:45PM +, Filippo Moretti via current wrote: > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with > triple

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:33:18PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 28/10/2021 18:25, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 11:05, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> > >> Please do not remove what is not broken. > > > > That is exactly the problem though: it was broken. It was fixed only > >

Re: git: "overlay" of own remote-branch on official freebsd-ports repo

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 05:31:48PM +0200, FreeBSD User wrote: > I'd like to ask how FreeBSD developers and maintainers do the trick. If there > is an > official cookbook fpr maintainers (I haven't found it yet ...), please be so > kind and > refer to it. Any advice is welcome. If you only want

Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR: this is not a proposal to deorbit csh from base!!! > > For years now, csh is the default root shell for FreeBSD, csh can be confusing > as a default shell for many as all other unix like settled on a bourne

Re: poudriere && moving from svn to git for downloading source

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:03:53AM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 09:27:59 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > >Hello, > > > >I use poudriere to compile my used ports. Could someone please explain > >or point me to a document which explains the now to be used syntax to >

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 06:32:43PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote this message on Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 19:28 +0100: > > Brooks Davis wrote in > > <20201218175241.ga72...@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>: > > |On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:53:20PM

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:53:20PM -0800, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > I hope we don't have to start signing all commits. saltstack/salt has > > > that policy, and it's extremely annoying. > > > Have to? Not currently. As with all process changes, there will be > > community discussion around the

Re: Deprecating ftpd in the FreeBSD base system?

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:43:16PM +0400, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:05 PM Cy Schubert > wrote: > > > I've been advocating removing FTP (and HTTP) from libfetch as well. People > > should be using HTTPS only. > > > > Isn't this a bit too much? I often find myself in need to

Re: compiling with ports llvm11 breaks on mman.h: struct shm_larg epage_conf

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:46:52PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 13 Sep 2020, at 20:56, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > On 12 Sep 2020, at 23:00, Ronald Klop wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 18:28:03 +0200, Dimitry Andric > >> wrote: > >>> On 12 Sep 2020, at 17:43, Ronald Klop wrote:

Re: xtoolchain-llvm10 missing?

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:52:04PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:15 PM Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Building CURRENT on my laptop takes very very long because every little > > change in llvm/clang makes it recompile a complete compiler. So I want to > > build

Re: lib/libsysdecode /usr/include/./sys/pioctl.h:45:2: error: " is deprecated

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:49:47PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Anyoe else seeing this on current ? > > ===> lib/libsysdecode (all) > env CPP="cpp" MK_PF="yes" /bin/sh /usr/src/lib/libsysdecode/mkioctls > /usr/include > ioctl.c.tmp > In file included from :97: >

Re: src/usr.bin/kyua breaks on manbuild.sh: Permission denied

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:15:29AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Ed Maste wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 20:48, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > l /usr/src/contrib/kyua/doc/manbuild.sh > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 5187 Mar 25 12:34 > > > /usr/src/contrib/kyua/doc/manbuild.sh

Re: buildworld failed (usr.bin/kyua)

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:07:08PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:40:18PM +0500, Ruslan Garipov wrote: > > I failed to update FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 r359231 to r359351. > > > > End of the build log: > > > > $ su root -c "make

Re: buildworld failed (usr.bin/kyua)

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:40:18PM +0500, Ruslan Garipov wrote: > I failed to update FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 r359231 to r359351. > > End of the build log: > > $ su root -c "make -j16 buildworld" > ... > ld: error: unable to find library -lkyua_cli_pie > ld: error: unable to find library

Re: FreeBSD-head-powerpc-build - Build #15561 (r359260) - Failure

I'm looking into this build error. I believe it's caused by under-specified LIBADD entries (and the corresponding __DP entries) and differing bfd vs lld behavior. Once I've got a failing powerpc build (in progress) I should be able to fix this pretty quickly. -- Brooks On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at

Re: [PATCH] Typo in libm code

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:45:43AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > This patch > > https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/lib/libm/src/ld80/k_sincosl.h?sortby=date > > is applicable to FreeBSD. > > Index: src/k_sincosl.h > === > ---

Re: adding a syscall to libc?

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:47:39PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On Saturday, June 8, 2019, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:57:27AM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've started working of a copy_file_range() syscall for FreeBSD. I think > > I have the

Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:33:05PM +1000, Trev wrote: > Joel Dahl wrote on 13/05/2019 19:29: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 06:27:12PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > >> as previous approved in FCP-

FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18

I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers as previous approved in FCP-101. The following drivers are slated for removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe Since the previous announcement dme(4)

Re: SCSI and dmesg

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:01:01AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:09 AM Alan Somers wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:57 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:32 PM Maxim

Re: head -r340287 's /usr/src/Makefile.libcompat still lists various LIB32CPUFLAGS= -target *-unknown-freebsd12.0 (not 13.0)

Fixed in r340371. Thanks, Brooks On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:27:44PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain wrote: > (Leading whitespace might not be preserved.) > > # svnlite diff /usr/src/Makefile.libcompat > Index: /usr/src/Makefile.libcompat >

Re: svn commit: r339898 - head/lib/libc/amd64/sys

On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:57:24AM -0400, Charlie Li wrote: > On 29/10/2018 20:11, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Author: kib > > Date: Tue Oct 30 00:11:30 2018 > > New Revision: 339898 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339898 > > > > Log: > > Convert amd64_get/set_fs/gsbase to

Re: which way to update export_args structure?

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:59:52PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org > on behalf of Rick Macklem > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:24 PM > To: Brooks Davis > Cc: FreeBSD Current; Josh Paetzel

Re: which way to update export_args structure?

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:49:23AM -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > > This is the direction I'd been thinking. FWIW, the usecase is more that > > once you've moved away from the struct it's easy t

Re: which way to update export_args structure?

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:17:37AM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > Yes, I think that's the right way foward. Thanks for following up. > >Rick Macklem wrote: > >> Just in case you missed it in the email thread, in your general question > >> b

Re: which way to update export_args structure?

On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:40:27AM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on updating "struct export_args" to fix/add a few things. > One of these is that "ex_flags" is an int, but the flags are defined in > mount.h > as MNT_xx bits that now exceed 32bits (mnt_flag is now uint64_t). >

Re: Clang cross-compiling to Cortex-M4 (ARM)

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 02:20:26PM +0200, Goran Meki?? wrote: > Hello, > > With Clang 4.0 cross-compiling works, but any later versions (I tried > 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 from packages) fails. This is the simple test program: > > #include > > int main() { > return 0; > } > > > These are the

Re: building LLVM threads gets killed

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 07:33:32PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 20 Aug 2018, at 16:26, Rodney W. Grimes > wrote: > > > >> On 20 Aug 2018, at 05:01, blubee blubeeme wrote: > >>> > >>> I am running current compiling LLVM60 and when it comes to linking > >>> basically all the processes on

Re: Tool Chain Migration: objdump users, please test llvm-objdump

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:46:46AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > Work is in progress to migrate fully to modern and permissively > licensed components for the tool chain. This includes moving away from > the three obsolete binutils components that are still in the base > system (as, ld, objdump).

Re: anyone running with ngroups increased from 16?

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:37:53PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Windows users seem to have an almost unlimited number of groups and > soem places seem to use them a LOT. > This gives Posix systems problems with deciding how to handle them > all. Especially when getting > user credentials from

32-bit compat ifconfig support

Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> - Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:50:13 + (UTC) From: Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org, svn-src-h...@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r331797 - in head/sys: dev/an dev/ath dev/cxgbe

md(4) ioctl ABI broken by r322969

Hi, I just noticed that r322969 consumed part of md_pad in struct md_ioctl. In moving the start of md_pad this broke the ABI of MDIOCLIST. At a glance it looks like the struct was sufficiently incompetently padded to begin with that the change of adding a char * and subtracting an int did not

Re: Clang-6 and GNUisms.

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 12 Mar 2018, at 00:56, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > > There's been some fallout in ports land since clang-6 around null > > pointer arithmetic and casts. I cannot think of a good reason for doing >

Re: [Bug 223383] pathconf querying for posix_falloc not supported on freebsd [devel/llvm*'s lld's are also broken by this for zfs and need updating]

I'll work on this. -- Brooks On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:09:00PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > [ devel/llvm* also have the issue in their > lld 's.] > > On 2017-Nov-7, at 4:43 PM, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote: > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223383 > > > > ---

Re: buildworld fails with warning in usr.bin/diff/diffreg.c

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:04:15AM -0700, Hamza Sheikh wrote: > The error is: > > --- all_subdir_usr.bin --- > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /home/vagrant/src/usr.bin/diff/diffreg.c: In function 'change': > /home/vagrant/src/usr.bin/diff/diffreg.c:1085: warning: 'i' may be > used

Re: how to mark llvm* forbidden?

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:35:35PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:26:18 +0000, Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:18:37PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote: &g

Re: how to mark llvm* forbidden?

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:18:37PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:51:40 +0000 Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote > > > >> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >>>

Re: how to mark llvm* forbidden?

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > OK I'm chasing -CURRENT, and I performed an initial > install, followed by a new world/kernel && ports about a > mos ago. Last Friday, I svn upped the system (src && ports), > rebuilt/installed world/kernel. I just began rebuilding > the

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:19PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 30 Mar 2017, at 19:06, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> ... > >>>

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:25:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Mar-27, at 2:41 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> I upgraded from llvm40 r4 to final. An interesting result was > >> its creation

Re: Import rcorder-visualize.sh from NetBSD?

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:23:33PM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 12/05/2016 15:13, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:16:49PM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > >> Would anyone object to me importing this script from NetBSD? > >> > >> http://cv

Re: Import rcorder-visualize.sh from NetBSD?

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:16:49PM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > Would anyone object to me importing this script from NetBSD? > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sbin/rcorder/rcorder-visualize.sh?rev=1.5=text/plain > > I ask in particular because of the non-BSD license. This

Re: External toolchain support broken for devel/llvm38 but not devel/llvm37

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:50:03PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:08:41 -0700 Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> > wrote > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:12:08PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > > > It looks like ther

Re: External toolchain support broken for devel/llvm38 but not devel/llvm37

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:12:08PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > It looks like there is something broken with the devel/llvm38 port or > external toolchain support has regressed: > > > This works: > make XCC=/usr/local/bin/clang37 XCXX=/usr/local/bin/clang++37 > XCPP=/usr/local/bin/clang-cpp37

Re: WITH_INSTALL_AS_USER broken?

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:57:04AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/24/2016 12:55 AM, Randy Westlund wrote: > > Is WITH_INSTALL_AS_USER supposed to work, or is it known to be broken? > > > > I'm cross compiling -current (r304727) for arm, and trying to install world > > as > > a user. Install

Re: HEADS UP: caution required with updates using custom kernels

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:24:21PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:51:11 +0000 Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:00:19AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Am Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:07:51 + > > > Brook

Re: HEADS UP: caution required with updates using custom kernels

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:00:19AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:07:51 + > Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> schrieb: > > > Kernel config minimalists and those running aarch64 and riscv systems will > > want to head this UPDATING message. >

HEADS UP: caution required with updates using custom kernels

- Forwarded message from Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> - Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:02:05 + (UTC) From: Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org, svn-src-h...@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r302152 - head Author: brooks D

Re: OpenSSH HPN

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote: > Hi, > > Please forgive my ignorance but what's the reason FreeBSD ships > OpenSSH patched with HPN by default? Besides my passion for > security, I've been working in the HPC sector for a while and > benchmarked the patch for a

Re: OpenSSH HPN

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:40:42PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 11/10/15 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind > > the upstream code. > > > > The main reason for this is the burden of maintaining the HPN patches. > >

Re: Extending PATH variable in top-level Makefile

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, When installing bmake from ports, the binary ends up in /usr/local/bin and our top-level Makefile doesn't check there: diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index e89a5b1..35ade48 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile

Re: LOCAL_MTREE vs DB_FROM_SRC

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:43:06PM -0800, Chris Torek wrote: (Apologies for google mail, I moved a while back and my office at home is still not up and hence my regular FreeBSD machine at home is also not up.) In Makefile.inc1 we have: .if defined(DB_FROM_SRC) INSTALLFLAGS+= -N

Re: nagios vs w/uptime

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:32:44PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 10 Feb 2015, at 22:17, Michael Gmelin gre...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net wrote: [Moving to

Re: PSA: If you run -current, beware!

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:48:54AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 05, 2015 04:22:23 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:21:45AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 05, 2015 08:48:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote: ... It is fixed (in the proper

Re: Is libLLVM-3.4.so: part of src or not?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Beeblebrox wrote: When starting Xorg, AIGLX gets disabled and RadeonKMS complains: (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/local/lib/dri/r600_dri.so failed (Shared object libLLVM-3.4.so n ot found, required by r600_dri.so) (EE) AIGLX: reverting to

Re: Changing timezone without reboot/restarting each service?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:57:40PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, November 10, 2014 7:36:19 am Lev Serebryakov wrote: After changing timezones in Russia (with replacing /etc/localtime with new file), I found that cron works in old timezone till restart. And all other services do

Re: issues w/ installing stuff multiple times...

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:55:09PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Oct 27, 2014, at 14:50, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote: There are issues w/ installing tests where the test files get installed multiple times. To reproduce this, use the following steps: make

Re: ssh None cipher

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:10:28AM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: On 2014-10-17 22:43, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Ben Woods wrote: Whilst trying to replicate data from my FreeNAS to my FreeBSD home theater PC on my local LAN, I came across this bug preventing use of the None

Re: capsicum and netmap ?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Hi, while trying the netmap-enabled libpcap library with tcpdump, i noticed it fails to return data on a kernel with capsicum (the string capability mode sandbox enabled made me suspicious, and removing the cap_*() calls from

Re: capsicum and netmap ?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:20:08PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:27:09PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Hi, while trying the netmap-enabled libpcap library with tcpdump, i noticed it fails to return

Re: shells/bash port, add a knob which symlinks to /bin/bash ?

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:33:58AM +0400, Subbsd wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, I could live with this solution of additional port outside of the main bash port, which creates the symlink and updates /etc/shells. This is the

Re: make -DNO_ROOT to create chroot, problem installing into chroot with pkg

On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 04:03:59PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, I am using pkg 1.3.7. I did the following as a regular user, not root: rm -fr /tmp/package cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel make -DNO_ROOT -DDB_FROM_SRC installworld DESTDIR=/tmp/package make

Re: make -DNO_ROOT to create chroot, problem installing into chroot with pkg

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:06:38PM -0400, Julio Merino wrote: On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: If you don't mind the ownership being wrong and there being a few extra +FOO files tar works. It would be great for someone to teach package to install

Re: ddb_enable=YES by default?

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:02:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Brooks, In r178450, you set the default of ddb_enable to NO: r178450 | brooks | 2008-04-23 15:40:59 -0700 (Wed, 23 Apr 2008) | 4 lines Changed paths:

Re: make installworld commands used to generate manifest for makefs?

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, Is there an easy way to take most of the commands performed during make installworld and create a manifest file which is compatible with makefs? make -DNO_ROOT -DDB_FROM_SRC DESTDIR=foo installworld should result in a

Re: make installworld commands used to generate manifest for makefs?

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:38:12AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, Is there an easy way to take most of the commands performed during make

Re: make installworld commands used to generate manifest for makefs?

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:28:43PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On 8/25/14, 12:36 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:38:12AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Craig

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:07:39PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:57:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at

Re: POLA.. missing --sysroot option in ld?

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02:31PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote: On 4/30/14, 10:36 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: In our 8.0 based systems at $JOB our build environment made heavy use of the --sysroot option in gcc and ld.

Re: odd message from ld in -current around 9.0 branchpoint

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:53:02AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:39, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote: I just recompiled ld and gcc and it's still not working.. did we break sysroot support some time in 2011? My memory may be faulty, but I was under the

Re: HEADS UP: sparc64 backend for llvm/clang imported

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:22:06PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: Hi, In r262613 I have merged the clang-sparc64 branch back to head. This imports an updated sparc64 backend for llvm and clang, allowing clang to bootstrap itself on sparc64, and to completely build world. To be able to build

Re: UDP Lite support

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. You've provided next

Re: installworld recreating unwanted dirs

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:25:48AM -0800, Sean Bruno wrote: I don't understand what I'm doing wrong here. I've added a lot of WITHOUT directives to my src.conf, but installworld seems to be ignoring them and recreating directories that make delete-old make delete-old-libs removes. Have I

Re: CUURENT kernel build broken - make[2]: exec(aicasm) failed (No such file or directory)

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:00:52AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 11:01 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:09:54PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: I /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.seq Imake[2]: exec(aicasm) failed (No such file or directory) I***

Re: CLang version was 3.3 and 3.4 in ports ...

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:57:07PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: Since /usr/ports/UPDATING refers to 3.4, will that be added to the /usr/$BASE ? Also, is it svn ot other to checkout the developmental version of clang et al what version are those? I'll probably get most of my answers researching

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:33:58PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-10-29 22:29, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct 29, 2013 7:21 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct

Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:52:13PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Thomas Mueller wrote this message on Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:00 +: But where is DB_FROM_SRC documented? I never saw it anywhere. UPDATING file needs to be updated for installing FreeBSD on a partition where

  1   2   3   4   >