On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:49:59PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > Question: Does the rpcbind program in -current have the same problem
> > or has it already been fixed by whomever you imported the code from?
> > (If it hasn't been fixed I'll be happy to fix it. I'm hoping it has,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:28:38PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Well I can't see that since it's not an array and the values come
> from iterating through Cisco's API and a direct query for the
> transmit key. Look at ancontrol for the ugly & secret details!
I'm pretty sure I've also managed t
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:16:44AM +0100, Duncan Barclay wrote:
> Can I suggest you add a DS22 for DS 22Mb/s which is going through final
> approvals at the IEEE.
I've added it and updated the diff for -current. I'll mess with the
-stable diff Thursday when I get back from my short vacation.
>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:42:48PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I'll try to spend some more time with it over the weekend, but I
> certainly see no objection to committing it as it stands presently.
> I *may* try it out on -STABLE (not entirely altruism on my part; it
> would make my life simpl
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:51:27PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> One concern, and this may well affect other NIC flavors, is the list of
> media types is a little annoying to parse. Hmmm... speaking Perl, I
> suppose it could be characterized as
>
> /^\s+supported media:(\s[\S+(\s)?)+$/
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:14:13PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away?
> I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff
> go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external
> program before bring
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:02:16AM +, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:21:46PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Ah, you are correct. I should have tried that. What a strange bug.
>
> It happens for any option which causes the sysctl to return no
> processes
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:17:37PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:12:29PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > I'm seeing a very strange problem with ps. I was calling "ps -U
>
> >From what I can tell (I've seen this for a while), calling ps
I'm seeing a very strange problem with ps. I was calling "ps -U
operator" to check the status of some dumps and it was working fine, but
then I ran it again and got a kinfo_proc size mismatch. Calling it with
no args still works, but calling it with -U doesn't. This is with a
current as of this
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:01:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > The rewind and non-rewind tape device names were changed under
> > devfs from rsa0 and nrsa0 to sa0 and nsa0, (which IMHO
> > violates POLA).
>
> They were changed in MAKEDEV long before that. MAKEDEV also provides
> 'r' n
Hi,
I plugged my HP Omnibook 4150 into my dock for the first time in a couple
months only to discover that I couldn't attach any of the PCI devices in
it. I'm running -current as of sometime in the last week or so. I traced
the problem to the new PCI code comitted six weeks ago. Specificaly:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:46:27PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" writes:
> : Is there a list of wireless pc cards that work (and how well they work)
> : with FreeBSD??
>
> There's /etc/defaults/pccard.conf, which says breifly:
> Aironet 340
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 09:37:53AM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Interesting. What other OS distribution put things that went into
> /usr/local on their distribution media?
I'm fairly sure that some of the software distributed by SGI on their
unsupported free software media does this.
-- Brooks
--
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 05:59:03PM +, Sascha Luck wrote:
> has anyone got the Lucent Orinoco Gold (11MBit/s) PC-Card working
> with the wi driver in -CURRENT?
They work fine.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
After updating about five days ago I noticed that I couldn't sucessfully
run gdb on my code any more. I'm pretty sure this is a real issue and
that I've correctly narrowed it down to a small typo in
sys/kern/kern_prot.h. There's a patch in the PR kern/22711 which fixes
it for me. Could someone
[A best this belonged on -questions though it's not really a FreeBSD
question at all.]
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:22:45AM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
> I've just gotten a HP Deskjet 840C (Bundled with a HP C200 camera)
>
> Is it just a windows-printer, and/or is it supported under Fbsd?
Under Fre
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:18:29PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> I am trying to identify some PCI chips on my Toshiba Satellite Pro
> 4340.
>
> Looking at sys/pci/pcisupport.c and dmesg, is it safe to assume these
> are matches? Looking at the spec of the system, it seems logical.
These are th
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:27:45PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> be?
I'm running it on my PIII 366 laptop. It's not great, but it's usable.
The biggest factors I've seen effecting performance are memory related.
Runnin
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:30:24AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:29:21PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > This is minimally correct. I.e. that's what the build system requires.
> > This works if you build static hints into your kernel.
>
&g
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 04:15:09AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Brooks Davis writes:
> > This is more correct. The new world order says that hints are not in the
> > kernel, instead they are loaded by the loader at boot time. By default
> > they are loaded from /boot/device.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:25:26AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> At the very least, there appears to be confusion about how to use the
> hints. I can see two conflicting views here:
>
> 1. You must have a /boot/device.hints file, but it may be empty.
This is minimally correct. I.e. that's what t
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:19:15AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> I do read cvs-all, and I missed it. Not did I find device.hints in the
> relevant Makefiles. Can you provide a pointer to details on how
> /boot/device.hints is used in the build process, or how having an
> empty one keeps you from s
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 09:33:21PM +0900, Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote:
>
> When kernel is built with static device wiring
> (i.e. 'hints' line is enabled in the config file),
> is /boot/device.hints required?
>
> Doing 'make install' without /boot/device.hints is failed,
> saying "You must set up
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:39:33AM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:49:24AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> The issue isn't with the size of the disk storage required, but
> with the mechanism. Why dedicate 256M to a suspend partition, and
> invent a new process saving mechanism, instead of making your
> existing swap partition 256M large
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:16:08AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> (*) Speaking of which: why are we considering doing process
> dumps into a _different_ swap-ish partition, instead of just
> ensuring that all processes are sleeping in the normal swap
> partition? If that was done, then they wou
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 01:12:23PM -0700, MikeM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the first time I've tried to install current,
> so if the following issue has already been discussed,
> please let me know where to find the logs.
>
> I am trying to upgrade from 3.2 Release to -current
> but the build fail
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
> Because I can't do anything more intelligent to find my 2-printer-panic,
> I'd like at least to know when it broke.
>
> It works in a kernel from march 15, and has been broken at least a week.
>
> So I cvsup to 2000.04.01.00.00.00 to
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 09:14:57PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> As of about Thursday, Apr 20 I get this message when I try to run linux
> ldconfig:
>
> Segmentation fault(core dumped)
>
> I recompiled the module and the kernel on this day so I think that's what
> cause the problem, but I
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 09:02:34PM +, attila! wrote:
> in 5.0-CURRENT as of this morning (Tue, 25) usr.sbin/xntpd
> was not in the cvs files.
xntpd is obsolete. It has been replaced with ntpd.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
To Unsubscribe
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> It still doesn't work at all, after multiple make worlds with the latest
> crypto sources all around. I'm going to update the port and then try that
> instead.
It works for me. I just tested it from my laptop (current
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 05:01:28PM -0800, Southwell wrote:
> It would be good to be ahead of the game rather than behind it on this
> occasion --
Well, get started then. ;-) Most people currently writing code have
better things to do then write drivers for vaporware. The problem is
that, people
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 11:30:40AM -0800, Southwell wrote:
> Is anyone working on BlueTooth support for freeBSD?
I doubt it. We typicaly wait for someone to actually ship something
before going through the pain of trying to implement support for it.
Bluetooth has been demoed extensivly, but I do
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 02:30:03PM -0800, Southwell wrote:
> Ok Guys
>
> Help needed -- I would be grateful for any information which would be
> useful for a project to provide IEEE 1394 (firewire support) on FreeBSD 4.0.
> In particular to start with
> the Texas Instruments OHCI compliant contr
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:35:31PM -0400, Eric D. Futch wrote:
> I figured it would take more work than I put into it. It was just a shot
> in the dark. I think I have one of these cars in my Linux box at home
> which I wouldn't mind ripping out and sticking in this machine. Let me
> know if it
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 08:43:30PM -0400, Eric D. Futch wrote:
> Ok.. I figured I'd take this on on my way to getting more comfy with
> FreeBSD. Check out my patch and let me know how far I've gone off the
> deep end :)
>
> http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/if_vx_pci.c.patch
>
> Unfortunate
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 08:43:30PM -0400, Eric D. Futch wrote:
> Ok.. I figured I'd take this on on my way to getting more comfy with
> FreeBSD. Check out my patch and let me know how far I've gone off the
> deep end :)
>
> http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/if_vx_pci.c.patch
>
> Unfortunate
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote:
> Maybe there are some people with the same problem .. or maybe someone
> who knows what this could be and how this problem sneaked into the system.
> I'm cunning -CURRENT for ages but since March 19 I am unable to compile
>
Hi,
I've written a new-bus probe/attach patch for the tx driver and
submitted it as PR kern/17601. It works for me, but it could definatly
use wider testing as it's my first venture into driver hacking. If
you've got one of these cards please give it a spin.
Thanks,
Brooks
--
Any statement o
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:15:37PM -0500, Ted Sikora wrote:
> Does anyone know what they are now or will be? I want to follow
> 4.0-stable if there will be one. Right now I have been cvsup'ing
> from 4.0-RC to 5.0-current. I am assuming there will be:
>
> 3-stable
> 4-stable
> 5-current
>
> Yes
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 05:27:30PM -0500, Will Saxon wrote:
> Not certain what list this ought to go to, perhaps -questions so I
> apologize if this is not the right one.
-questions was the right place. This has nothing do with current.
Redirecting to -questions.
> I was wondering if there coul
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:33:05PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> Is there actually a RELENG_4 (release) ? I have seen a couple messages saying
> there is and a few saying there isnt.
There is a RELENG_4 (cvsup'ing my CVS repository took forever this
morning ;-), but there is not a 4.0 release tag
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 04:49:06PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis writes:
> : You don't need to update /dev though. As long as you don't change
> : anything else, a 4.0 kernel will work just fine with a 3.x /dev and
> :
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 07:14:42PM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 10:19:57AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 11:01:09AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > > To which the response has been nil. At this point, you're either all
&
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 11:01:09AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
> Quoting the whole thing deliberately:
>
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 08:24:35PM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
[snip]
>
> To which the response has been nil. At this point, you're either all
> struck dumb by the staggering simplicity and el
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:25:26PM -0800, Sean-Paul Rees wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (cvsup'ed as of tonight) machine. It has a USB
> controller (PIIX3) and an ethernet controller sharing irq 10. I'm not
> much in the way of a hardware expert, so I'm wondering if this is safe or
> if I s
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:57:38PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
> > Also, it's persistent for legitimate design reasons, just like files
> > are. Applications need to clean up after themselves.
>
> You can have many more than 32 files. Files are (usually)
> well-organized and have names, so
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:27:49PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> > > Beautiful. Thank you :)
> > > What about for isa cards? Which one is used for them no
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 01:23:22PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:27:49PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> > Beautiful. Thank you :)
> > What about for isa cards? Which one is used for them now?
>
> I gave my only ISA sound card to Camran so I ca
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:27:49PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> Beautiful. Thank you :)
> What about for isa cards? Which one is used for them now?
I gave my only ISA sound card to Camran so I can't say for sure, but if
you hardware the probe address the card ends up at that number and I
th
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:15:39PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> In 4.0, the pcm sound driver works with my es1371 chipset soundcard for
> playing cds. But I cannot play mp3s. When I use mpg123, I get the error
> message "can't open /dev/dsp!"
> This is an improvement over 3.4, however, where
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 07:11:00PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> I followed up the stuff posted here and this evening I want to change one of
> our smaller server towards FBSD 4.0. Got the CD, have a complete new
> source tree cvsuped this day and now I make a cd /sys/i386/conf ...
> Within
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Thomas Veldhouse wrote:
> No overclocked bus. I do have the Pentium 166MMX overdrive processor on
> the board though. It used to have a 100MHz Pentium in it. However, if
> this is causing ATA some problem, it probably shouldn't. Like I said, the
> old
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:51:52AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:46:59PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Wine thinks it can use byacc, but it needs bison. The patch attached to
> > the PR ports/16344 will fix the build or you can just cd to
>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 03:30:34PM -0600, Adriel Ickler wrote:
> After upgrading to 4.0-current and attempting a clean install of wine, I
> saw this:
>
> ./parser.y: In function `yyparse':
> ./parser.y:1624: syntax error before `}'
>
> in: /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-991114/tools/wrc/par
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Perhaps an option to CVSup to test a group of servers and render a "rating"
> for each, or to choose a "best" one. Then an intelligent human being could
> use this information to occasionally change which cvsup server they use.
>
> Su
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:53:10PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug
>Russell writes:
> : See, I knew there was a reason I hung on to all these 1M 30 pin SIMMs. :)
> : Old 386/40s sure make nice little router/modem/whatever boxes. :)
>
> Until their hard disks go s
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 11:23:21PM -0600, Kevin Entringer wrote:
> Recently someone posted a url that provided a quick run through on some
> important extra steps to take while doing a make world from -STABLE to
> -CURRENT, unfortunatly I lost the URL. I was wondering if someone could
> post it a
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 07:47:23PM +, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> just a very basic question that would resolve a dispute between colleagues.
>
> When one talks about Fbsd3.3-STABLE my impression is that such version is a
> stage before the Fbsd3.3-RELEASE. In other words the -RELEASE is for th
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, David Holloway wrote:
> To David Greenman or.. whoever is maintaining if_fxp.c
> I picked up an 82559 card from compusa today...
> Guess what?! It's device id was 0x1030 instead of 0x1229.
>
> I adjusted my driver to match and it seems to work fine.
Support was added in -cu
301 - 360 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
