Re: wpa_supplicant gets points for trying, I suppose....

2010-11-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:27:02AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > ... > There is ieee80211_notify_radio(), granted iwn(4) misses the calls.. that > function is supposed to notify upper layers about the radio state (0 = off, 1 > = on). Anyways, once wpa_supplicant import/update is done, I'll pro

Re: wpa_supplicant gets points for trying, I suppose....

2010-11-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 06:30:10PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Thanks. I had quick look into that and I currently do not see an easy > way to address that issue, as in tell wpa_supplicant about the device's > state. This might change though once a newer wpa_supplicant has been > importe

Re: wpa_supplicant gets points for trying, I suppose....

2010-11-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:40:54AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > > I have the switch on this laptop in position to disable the wireless > > > device (iwn(4)). Is there some way wpa_supplicant (or something) might > > > be able to recognize that this is a pointless exercise? > > > > We

wpa_supplicant gets points for trying, I suppose....

2010-11-01 Thread David Wolfskill
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #31 r214621M Nov 1 15:09:40 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan. Nov 1 15:10:10 d130 last message repeated 3 times Nov 1 15:10:50 d130 last message repeated 4 times ... Nov 1 15:11:00 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan. Nov 1 15:11:10 d13

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-04 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:56:13PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:30:01PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > >> ... > >> I found the disabling the "Module Bay" appea

Re: [geom, cam] Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-04 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:44:18AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > ... > Interesting! :-} > So, init thread is blocked in vfs_mountroot()->g_waitidle() waiting for geom > to > complete probing cd device, but the latter is blocked in cam_periph_getccb() > waiting for a ccb. > Can you try to reproduc

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 03:42:51PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > ... > well you got the stacktrace of the keyboard handler since you got into > ddb via the keyboard.. OK > you need to see what ELSE is running.. especially the initial threads. > and look at THOSE stacks Ah. My lack of pr

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:52:19PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/10/2010 14:28 David Wolfskill said the following: > [snipped] > > Can't you just drop to DDB prompt and examine where the threads are? Eh -- thanks for the reality check; I needed that. :-} OK; I enab

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:38:59PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:56:13PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote: > > ... > > > Any ideas on what mught be causing CURRENT to hang -- sometimes > > > -- given that it appears to involve the Modular Bay (o

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:37:50PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > ... > > albert(8.1-S)[11] ls -lT > > total 196 > > -rw-r--r--  1 david  wheel   11497 Oct  1 20:19:06 2010 console.log > > -rw-r--r--  1 david  wheel   60397 Oct  1 19:26:23 2010 dmesg.boot > > -rw-r--r--  1 david  wheel  114752 Oct

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:37:50PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > ... > This might sound like a stupid idea, but can you try booting with > a CD/DVD in the drive? Ah -- sorry about that. :-( OK; it may be a bit before I get a successful verbose boot without ATA_CAM and with the CD/DVD drive i

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:56:13PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote: > ... > > Any ideas on what mught be causing CURRENT to hang -- sometimes > > -- given that it appears to involve the Modular Bay (or the specific > > device that is in the bay during the hang)? > > > > If you haven't already, it may b

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:22:33PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > ... > > Any ideas on what mught be causing CURRENT to hang -- sometimes > > -- given that it appears to involve the Modular Bay (or the specific > > device that is in the bay during the hang)? > > Do you have boot -v output? Ye

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:30:01PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > I found the disabling the "Module Bay" appears to avoid the hang -- > reliably. > > That appears to be the minimally-invasive change necessary to avoid the > hang. > Until I realized what

Re: Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:20:38PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > I have recently acquired a new laptop (to replace the "Frankenlaptop" > I've been using for the last several years). > ... > While I'm not about to assume that this indicates something wrong > wi

Hang near end of kernel probes since r213267 (likely earlier)

2010-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
I have recently acquired a new laptop (to replace the "Frankenlaptop" I've been using for the last several years). The new machine is a Dell Precision M4400, so it's pretty recent technology compared to what I'm used to. :-} I installed FreeBSD 8.1-R on slice 1, customized it a bit to work in my

Re: Panic: Kernel page fault with ath0_com_lock held, r211295

2010-08-14 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > ... > > OK; I reverted by doing this: > > > > g1-46(9.0-C)[1] cd /usr/src > > g1-46(9.0-C)[2] svn merge -c -211295 file:///svn/freebsd/src/base/head > > --- Reverse-merging r211295 into 'sys': > > U    sys/net80211/ieee80211_node.c

Re: Panic: Kernel page fault with ath0_com_lock held, r211295

2010-08-14 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:07:13AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > You should be able to revert the ath changes reasonably easy. > > Would you mind doing that and see if that fixes or contributes to the problem? OK; I reverted by doing this: g1-46(9.0-C)[1] cd /usr/src g1-46(9.0-C)[2] svn merge -c

Re: Panic: Kernel page fault with ath0_com_lock held, r211295

2010-08-14 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:07:13AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > You should be able to revert the ath changes reasonably easy. > > Would you mind doing that and see if that fixes or contributes to the problem? Will do; I'll report back when I have information to report -- probably within 30 minute

Panic @r210841 in iwi_auth_and_assoc(): iwi firmware not idle, state ASSOCIATING

2010-08-05 Thread David Wolfskill
Before I get to the "good stuff", I'll note that: * I'm no longer running a VIMAGE kernel, so that possible source of confusion should be absent. * The hardware in question (a miniPCI device in my laptop) has been working under stable/7 and stable/8 (so I believe that there should be nothin

Re: PCcard NIC insert: "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-07-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:12:50AM +0200, Marko Zec wrote: > > VIMAGE kernels do not properly set curvnet context when dynamically attaching > devices (such as USB or pccard NICs), that's why the dereferencing V_if_index > fails. You can use the "show pcpu" and "show vnets" DDB commands to

Re: PCcard NIC insert: "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-07-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:12:50AM +0200, Marko Zec wrote: > ... > > Symptom is that I get a panic on insert (or kernel probe, if it's > > inserted already at boot time) of a PCcard NIC. > > > VIMAGE kernels Oh -- right. I fogot that I had configured this kernel for VIMAGE so Julian to demo som

Re: /tmp and swap space

2010-07-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:23:37PM +, Benjamin Stuppin wrote: > ... > when using tmpfs for /tmp i'd probably add the "mode=1777" option, else you > would mount /tmp with default options and without the sticky bit which could > cause some problems. I have never needed to do that. d254(9.0-C

Re: /tmp and swap space

2010-07-29 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 08:35:30AM -0700, gahn wrote: > hi all: > > is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? Certainly; case in point: localhost(9.0-C)[4] uname -v FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #71 r210558M: Wed Jul 28 07:46:04 PDT 2010 r...@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY loc

Re: making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > On 07/26/10 09:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > > This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources > > updated to r210495: > [ .. ] > > > ===> usr.bin/kdump (depend) > > sh /usr

making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread David Wolfskill
This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources updated to r210495: >>> World build started on Mon Jul 26 05:12:42 PDT 2010 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the o

Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502

2010-06-26 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:10:57PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: > ... > what do you see when you type boot0cfg -v ...? > gpart show? > then try > gpart set -a active -i n aacd0 > n will probably be 5. > > bottom line, the MBR is NOT being updated by boot0cfg OK; here's what I see -- note t

Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502

2010-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:37:36AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 25 June 2010 7:40:11 am David Wolfskill wrote: > > Well, one one of my machines -- I realize that there are some > > machines for which it's been problematic for a while. And all of > > the mach

Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502

2010-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
Well, one one of my machines -- I realize that there are some machines for which it's been problematic for a while. And all of the machines I'm using run FreeBSD/i386. But it had been working on my build machine since I acquired it (a few months ago) in daily use. Of course, I didn't notice the

Re: Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:09PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > Please try 207949 > ... The panic (this time) didn't show up until about 10 seconds after the login: prompt showed up on the serial console. Here's what it looks like: ... 3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3 3 or [Space]

Re: Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:32:14PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > Could you please try with 207902? > ... I saved that environment (documented elsewhere ini the thread), then performed the normal (for me) daily update, this time, to r207911. Again, I see a panic during transition from single-user mode t

Re: Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:52:07PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:39:11PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > Are you not able to dump core? > > > > Here's the crash summary; I can put the dump on my Web server on request. > (It weighs in

Re: Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:32:14PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > Could you please try with 207902? > ... First, thanks for the response. OK; I grabbed r207902 & applied it (via "patch -p1"), then rebuilt the kernel & rebooted; here's the panic now: 3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3 3 or [

Re: Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:22:43PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > ... > You don't happen to have a backtrace? Oops -- sorry; got caught up in getting ready to head in to work: db> bt Tracing pid 20 tid 100067 td 0xc5a19000 _mtx_lock_flags(58,0,c0cd2d5b,570,80,...) at _mtx_lock_flags+0x46 flowtable_f

Panic @r207844; current process: flowcleaner "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode"

2010-05-10 Thread David Wolfskill
During transition to multi-user mode on first reboot after upgrading from r207812 -> r207844; from the sserial console: 3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3 3 or [Space] to pause timer 0 3 @DY GDB: no debug ports present KDB: debugger

Re: Panic @r207433: "System call fork returning with the following locks held"

2010-04-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 07:27:32PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > ... > Please try r207438. OK; that worked -- thanks! I actually merely hand-edited the one file & rebuilt the kernel; boot to multi-user mode was uneventful, and: FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #

Panic @r207433: "System call fork returning with the following locks held"

2010-04-30 Thread David Wolfskill
This was during the single- to multi-user transition on boot; I was going to skip the output from the LORs, but I suspect that some of them might be relevant; see below. I can leave the system in this state for a whle, but I normally power it off (to reduce heat, noise, and electricity consumption

SIGSEGV in dc, at bcode.c:277 (function reset_bmachine())

2010-04-10 Thread David Wolfskill
As these things go, this probably isn't as critical as most thinsg disussed on this list, but I happened to notice it today, built a debugging world and at least cornered the annoying little varmint. Sorry; no patch at this time. :-( Here's how to reproduce it: while running CURRENT, invoke dc(1)

Re: Panic @r205276 (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode)

2010-03-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:09:11PM +, Rui Paulo wrote: > ... > > Do you all have either out-of-tree modules or modules that you did not > > re-build when re-compiling your kernel? > > I have in-tree modules, but I tried a clean build. I corresponded with kmacy@ a bit yesterday. Pending resol

Panic @r205276 (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode)

2010-03-18 Thread David Wolfskill
On first reboot after building & installing; yesterday (@r205249) was OK: 3 1. Boot FreeBSD [default] 3 |_| |_| \___|\___| 3 2. Boot FreeBSD with ACPI disabled 3 _ _ 3 3. Boot FreeBSD in Safe Mode 3 | _ \ / | __ \ 3 4. Boot Fr

Re: SMP deadlock during multi-user mode transition after r204866

2010-03-12 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:04:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > My build machine (dmesg attached) is a dual CPU, single-core box; my > laptop is a single CPU, single-core box. I track head on each daily; > while the build machine has been locking up during the transition to > mul

SMP deadlock during multi-user mode transition after r204866

2010-03-11 Thread David Wolfskill
My build machine (dmesg attached) is a dual CPU, single-core box; my laptop is a single CPU, single-core box. I track head on each daily; while the build machine has been locking up during the transition to multi-user mode since Tuesday (when I had built CURRENT at r204909; previous was r204866, o

Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything

2003-11-23 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:34:08 +0600 (NOVT) >From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So, imagine, i'm accidentally deleted /bin with your most wanted >static sh... And, of course, due to static nature of /bin/sh it was >removed from /rescue? Nothing will protect you from shooting i

mbrlen() vs. compatibility with -STABLE-compiled ports

2003-11-23 Thread David Wolfskill
Perhaps it's unrealistic to expect this to work, but on each of the machines where I run -CURRENT, I also run -STABLE (on other slices), but I generally only build ports under -STABLE, and /usr/local is common to both the -CURRENT and -STABLE environments. (I build -CURRENT with "COMPAT4X= yes" sp

Panic (kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled) in propagate_priority()

2003-11-20 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; I managed to build yesterday's -CURRENT (I update my local FreeBSD CVS repository mirror from 0347 - 0354 hrs. US/Pacific, daily) on my SMP "build" machine, and the resulting system appeared fairly normal: it booted to multi-user mode, and I could login via the serial console. (I wasn't expecti

Re: Help getting Realtek 8129-based NIC recognized?

2003-11-18 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:11:00 -0700 (MST) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Help getting Realtek 8129-based NIC recognized? >From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Have you tried re? It's in the kernel config, yes: device rl # RealTek 8129/

Help getting Realtek 8129-based NIC recognized?

2003-11-17 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; now that I finally(!) got a version of -CURRENT built and running in multi-user mode, I'll try to help identify a problem I've observed since September, when Bill Paul committed src/sys/pci/if_rl.c rev. 1.119. And to the extent I'm able, I'd like to help with a solution. :-} The machine in q

Re: dhclient/ipfw conflict on boot

2003-09-24 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:58:12 -0500 >From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: dhclient/ipfw conflict on boot >I just ran into this today after upgrading. It seems that dhclient is >unable to initialize properly at boot time, due to the prior initializati

panic: mi_switch: kse state?

2003-09-18 Thread David Wolfskill
This is on my (SMP) "build" machine; sources updated between 0347 - 0355 hrs. US/Pacific (7 hrs. W of GMT). I had done the usual buildworld, kernel, installworld, mergemaster, rebooted, ran "healthd -d" for a little while (enough to see some plausible variation), then entered sudo boot0c

Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20

2003-09-13 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT) >From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20 >Your backtrace shows that your acpi_tz_

page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20

2003-09-13 Thread David Wolfskill
Got today's (CVSup between 03:47 - 03:55 US/Pacific, 7 hrs. W of GMT) -CURRENT built on the laptop (i5000e) without incident -- after having built from similarly-updated source on my build machine without incident. On reboot, saw (hand-transcribed, so there may be transcription errors): ... Start

Realtek 8129 doesn't seem to be probing since 08 Sep 2003

2003-09-09 Thread David Wolfskill
My SMP (2x886 MHz PIII) "build" machine has a RealTek 8129 NIC; I generally track -CURRENT (on slice 4) on a daily basis. Until yesterday (08 Sep, as I write this), it had worked adequately for my purposes. After the build & reboot yesterday (and again today), the NIC does not seem to have been p

Oh, bother! Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2003-09-02 Thread David Wolfskill
Running -CURRENT with sources updated between 0347 - 0356 hrs. PDT (US/Pacific -- 7 hrs. west of GMT at this time of year) yesterday; in the process of building today's -CURRENT. (Had a similar-looking problem yesterday, but I got involved in some other things, and didn't make the time to report i

Re: ACPI mailling list?

2003-06-17 Thread David Wolfskill
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:42:22 -0400 >Subject: ACPI mailling list? >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I will Cc: -current despite that request.] >Is there an ACPI mailling list I can join >to help debug/test ACPI? See http://www.jp.f

Re: Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default?

2003-06-13 Thread David Wolfskill
>From: "Roderick van Domburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:18:45 +0200 >Subject: Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default? >Right now, rc.firewall isn't set up to support DHCP configurations although >it could easily be done so. More or less, depending on

RE: Buildkernel broken

2003-05-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:18 -0400 >From: "Will Saxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I cvsupped the source this morning and I get: >> [...] >> ===> firewire/firewire >> ... >> In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/fwohci.c:72: >> @/dev/firewire/fwdma.h:38: redefinition of `bus_dmasync_op_t

Re: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

2003-03-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:34:31 -0800 (PST) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:46:39 -0800 (PST) >>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >[Yes, I'm responding to my own post] Again. Well, I tried "

Re: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

2003-03-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:46:39 -0800 (PST) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Yes, I'm responding to my own post] >Got -CURRENT (re-)built; booted, logged in, poked around, seemed OK; >issued: > sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p >

Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

2003-03-28 Thread David Wolfskill
Been tracking -CURENT (& -STABLE, though that is of marginal relevance to this) on a daily basis for a couple of years now. Gone fairly well, usually; sometimes there's turbulence. I suspect this is just a bump, though -- and it's the first one I've encountered in at least a couple of weeeks. So

Re: Unclean sync in current

2003-03-25 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:47:18 -0800 >From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:14:26PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > I've been seeing this for a couple of weeks since I updated my laptop to >> > CURRENT. I do a normal shutdown (-p or -r) and reboot. The shutdown

Re: Giving up on three buffers...

2003-02-24 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:39:08 -0800 >From: walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >After this morning's cvsup I now get a 'syncing disks...giving up >on three buffers' error message when shutting down the system and >the filesystem doesn't get properly dismounted. >For the last four days I could never shut

Re: make world fails in libexec/pt_chown

2003-02-24 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:43:34 +0100 >From: Christoph Kukulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Freshly supped and got: >===> libexec/pt_chown >cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -c >/usr/src/libexec/pt_chown/pt_chown.c >cc1: warnings being treated as errors >/usr/sr

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:58:15 -0800 >From: David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I asked the question in hopes that there would be some neat >feature of cvsup that mocked up some CVS metadata for me, but >since nobody has mentioned any such thing, I guess I'm out of >luck. Mirroring the entire re

Re: unable to use boot0cfg

2002-12-04 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:17:39 +0200 >From: Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I'm using both -current and -stable on the same machine, very >common. Boot0cfg has -s [12345] flag to set the slice to boot on and >it has been working so far. Beginning from Dec 1, I'm unable to set >the slice: >ro

Re: X11/panic after today's cvsup

2002-12-02 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:01:43 -0600 >From: "Alan L. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> kernel: recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vm page queue mutex @ >> ../../../i386/i386/pmap.c:928 >> $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/vm_map.c,v 1.273 2002/12/01 18:57:56 alc Exp $ >> $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/pmap

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:20:38 -0800 >From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >It's often more efficient to use binary installations/upgrades than >source, on slow machines. For example, I build world on a fast >machine, mount via NFS and then installworld on my slower machines. Quite so -- no

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Wolfskill
>From: David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:47 -0600 [Well, I'm Cc:ing -current anyway -- dhw] >Out of curiosity, how much slower is a 5.x kernel compilation than a 4.x, on >average? My 486, 66 MHz and 16 MB RAM, compiles a 4.x kernel in ab

Re: installworld fail

2002-11-25 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:28 +0800 >From: Ying-Chieh Liao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 00:06:59 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: >> I'm in DP2, and cvsup and then make world... >> >> if [ -L /usr/share/examples/sunrpc ]; then rm -f /usr/share/examples/sunrpc; fi >> if [ -L /usr

Re: Weird error during "make installworld" [executable becomes "data"]

2002-11-17 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:06:40 +0100 >From: Stefan Farfeleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> g1-9(5.0-C)[2] file /tmp/install.*|* | grep data >^ >> #SC.SAVE~: Command not found. >Are these just typoes in the mail or did you really type this? :-) I cut & pasted it.

Re: Weird error during "make installworld" [executable becomes "data"]

2002-11-17 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:18:03 -0800 (PST) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Yes, replying to my own message, if not myself dhw] >Here's an excerpt of the typescript from the "make installworld": >---%<- snip! --

Re: Asking for tester (small patch to chown(8)/chgrp(1))

2002-11-16 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:29:20PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > I've submitted a small patch (bin/45333) for both -stable > and -current, but I haven't been able to test it under > -current (due to lack of a spare machine). Would someone > please give it a try and let me know if it compiles and >

Weird error during "make installworld" [executable becomes "data"]

2002-11-12 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; this is a bit strange, and I've come up with a circumvention (read "really ugly bloody hack"), but my real concern is that this may be a manifestation or symptom of something broken in some subtle way. The note is rather long- winded; sorry about that, but I didn't see a better way to do this.

newfs chokes, cores, & dies if inode density too high; patch attached

2002-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
For various reasons (most of which are likely historical), I tend to mount /tmp as a swap-backed memory file system (and allocate quite a bit of space to swap). Thus, in -STABLE, I use an mfs; in -CURRENT, I use a little shell script (cribbed almost verbatim from "man mdconfig"). Some months back

"Expensive timeout(9) function" @an_stats_update() [/usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:724]

2002-10-22 Thread David Wolfskill
Noticed a bunch of: > Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0170e40(0xc274c000) 0.001114387 from running (yesterday's) -CURRENT, so I thought I'd check against (yesterday's kernel.debug (before I replaced it with today's). Per "nm -lan kernel.debug", I see: c0170420 T an_attach/usr/src/sys/dev/

RE: Laptop lockup on re-inserting CD-RW after "atacontrol detach

2002-10-16 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:22 -0400 (EDT) >From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I *believe* that I had successfully inserted the drive after "atacontrol >> detach 1" shortly after the atacontrol-related changes were MFCed. >You probably want to do things in the following sequence: >- at

Laptop lockup on re-inserting CD-RW after "atacontrol detach 1"

2002-10-15 Thread David Wolfskill
This happened to me about a week ago under -STABLE, and again today under -STABLE, so I tried it under -CURRENT today (in single-user mode, to reduce variables), and was able to re-create it. I *believe* that I had successfully inserted the drive after "atacontrol detach 1" shortly after the atac

Re: ** HEADS UP ** DON'T MAKE WORLD !!!

2002-10-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:42:34AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:04:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I've ended up hosing world with the Binutils upgrade. > > I think world is OK now. Looks as if something is (still?) broken: >>> stage 4: building everything.. ...

panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) sellck @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1191

2002-10-09 Thread David Wolfskill
I'm including [EMAIL PROTECTED] because there may well be some interaction with the recently-imported acpica-unix-20021002. Please be judicious with respect to where replies are directed. The panic occurred with -CURRENT CVSupped around 0347 hrs. US/Pacific (7 hrs. west of GMT, at this time of y

Re: xdm can not login on current

2002-10-06 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:48:33 +0800 >From: suken woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >xdm broken on current when login . It isn't for me, and I've been tracking -CURRENT daily for some time. >i knew this is the pam module >problem,but how could i fix it? Well, absent any clues as to why you think it

Re: panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) today

2002-10-03 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:16:03 -0700 (PDT) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally, >built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics: > Today's -CURRENT did

panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) today

2002-10-02 Thread David Wolfskill
Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally, built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics: ... Starting nfsd. Updating motd. Starting ntpd. Configuring syscons: blanktime. Starting sshd. Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc02bea10(0xc406a000) 0.006791320 g_dev_

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-01 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; after building today's -CURRENt on my build machine, I had time to try building the kernel again, but with GEOM. 3 observations so far: * Nearly everything still works. :-) * A verbose boot (my default on the machine in question, since I often need to check things or quote boot messages)

Circumvention for sys/net/if_ethersubr.c

2002-09-12 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; it's probably rather like a sledgehammer, but I got the kernel to compile and run with the following patch: Index: sys/net/if_ethersubr.c === RCS file: /cvs/freebsd/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v retrieving revision 1.120 diff -u -

Re: installworld broken

2002-09-04 Thread David Wolfskill
>From: "Mario Goebbels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:27:52 +0200 >H. Is mergemaster really necessary? I mean when upgrading from a fresh >4.6 install? Note that this is posted to the -current list, so the context *I* infer from this is that you're re

Re: Kernel compile at aic7xxx/aicasm today's current.

2002-08-31 Thread David Wolfskill
[I tried to send this unicast to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the attempt was rejected with an "reason: 550 5.7.1 Access denied" as the only excuse given for the behavior. dhw] Adding a "cleandepend" stanza similar to the just-added "cleandir" stanza seems to get beyond that. Cheers, david -- David

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: >> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end >> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and >> the panic alw

World breakage + (possible) patch [compiles; still building world]

2002-08-18 Thread David Wolfskill
Symptom: ===> sbin/ifconfig cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -I..-c /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall -Wmi

Re: World breakage in lib/libc/gen/disklabel.c; here's a patch

2002-08-16 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:03:06 -0700 (PDT) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >The following patch (from /usr/src) gets past the problem, but I >don't know that it's correct: Still don't know about "correct," but it was incomplete. >Index

World breakage in lib/libc/gen/disklabel.c; here's a patch

2002-08-16 Thread David Wolfskill
>>> stage 4: building libraries ... cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_MAJOR=5 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../. ./include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -I/common/S4/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -DYP -DHESIOD

Re: Weirdness trying -STABLE -> -CURRENT

2002-08-14 Thread David Wolfskill
Warning: this is ~200 lines long. Sorry. I think the issue raised is worth maybe 10% of the bandwidth, but >Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:33:33 +0200 >From: Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Thanks for getting back with the results. This points to the fatc that >the instructions in UPDATI

Re: Weirdness trying -STABLE -> -CURRENT

2002-08-12 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:41:19 +0200 >From: Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >First off, sorry for the lot of snippage but this mail was really >long... Yeah, it was; sorry. That's what I get for trying to be complete. :-) I was able to re-do the steps, and evtually get to a point: fre

Weirdness trying -STABLE -> -CURRENT

2002-08-11 Thread David Wolfskill
I've been tracking each of -STABLE & -CURRENT for a while now, so it's been almost a year since I tried the -STABLE -> -CURRENT upgrade path. Still, I was a bit skeptical when someone on the #FreeBSD channel at irc.sage-members.org indicated that the "make installworld" was failing for him, typic

Re: Today's -CURRENT -- SMP OK; UP panics

2002-07-31 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:58:04 -0700 (PDT) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >[Re: panic during probes at boot time for today's -CURRENT] Well, absent any better ideas, I rebooted the laptop, but into single-user mode. It came up just fine, so I did the &

Today's -CURRENT -- SMP OK; UP panics

2002-07-31 Thread David Wolfskill
CVSup was at the usual time, 0347 hrs. US/Pacific. SMP build machine built, installed, and rebooted just fine. Trying to do likewise on my (UP) laptop got as far as the reboot, which got a panic. I don't have a serial console on the laptop, so I'm hand- transcribing this: ... pcm0: pch[2].offs

Re: A fix of recent bugs in swapping in/out a process

2002-07-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 21:51:57 +0900 >From: Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >If you are having a trouble of a broken thread state (eg a thread with >TDS_RUNQ on no run queue) or a mysterious page fault on a kernel >memory (probably in mi_switch()), you may want to try my patch at: >http://p

ld hanging during build of today's -CURRENT

2002-07-18 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; I built today's -CURRENT (running yesterday's, as usual) on my SMP build machine without incident earlier today. And, as usual, I'm trying the same thing with my (UP) laptop. But this time, the sequence has come to a halt; here's what I see so far: >>> stage 4: populating /usr/obj/usr/src/i

Neither power-off nor timeout message from "halt -p" today

2002-07-11 Thread David Wolfskill
This is by no means critical; possibly not even "important" -- but after using my SMP "build machine" to build today's -STBALE (on slice 1) and today's -CURRENT (on slice 4) -- where "today" varies per the calendar -- it is my usual practice to issue sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p

Re: panic for today: "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled"

2002-07-08 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:20 -0700 (PDT) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to >boot my (SMP) build machine & login: >freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a >FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CU

Re: panic for today: "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled"

2002-07-08 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to boot my (SMP) build machine & login: freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Jul 8 16:28:30 PDT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBEAST i3

panic for today: "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled"

2002-07-08 Thread David Wolfskill
CVSup started at 0347 hrs. Pacfic Daylight (7 hrs. west of GMT/UTC) from cvsup14.freebsd.org. Build/install/mergemaster was uneventful. Reboot after mergemaster proceeded as if nothing strange was about to happen, then (cut/pasted from serial console): ... SMP: enabled INTs: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >