Mike Nowlin wrote:
>
> > I'd just seen a series of bad commits whose corrections weren't caught by the
> > frequency of my cvs updates I guees. Vinum is compiling now, and kernels with
> > IPSEC and INETV6 now link, it's just that last night's problems with more got
> > me a little ticked off.
>
Narvi wrote:
>
> Errrmmm Really, did you check the archives for the issue?
>
> There used to be a real long thread on why/why not sysV style init
> scripts. It produced not one but several flamewars iirc 8-)
>
> In short - if we change from the present scheme, we want something better
> tha
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> Yeah, I was just joking, I kinda like some things about SVR4, but I still
> think it would be nice to keep the option of using some of the regular rc
> scripts that we have now. Imagine the confusion of the people that have
> ONLY used FreeBSD when they go in and see
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:53:16PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Point well taken. If anyone has references to this work, or an easy
> > introduction to netbsd's version I'd love to look at them. I've been
> > hoping to carve o
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>
> Just curious, but wouldn't this be FreeSVR4??? :-)
I'm going to assume that the smiley means you're joking, but I hope
that we can stick to discussing this plan on its merits, rather than
rejecting it out of hand because it's like something that someone el
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > I'm going to reply to the system part of this too, replies to this
> > thread should split off to -current. I have a design in mind for a new
> > rc system that uses scripts with "s
On Mon, 8 May 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 11:36:45PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > /usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined
> > /usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the location of the
>
> In the old
Got the following with up to the minute sources:
cc -O -pipe
-I/usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace
-I/usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -c
/usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c
sh /usr/amd/realmounts/slav
Steve Price wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> # Ok, here are some silly questions. Did you create a private key for
> # this server, did you encrypt your cert with it, and is that .key file
> # pointed to in your httpd.conf config file? SSLCertific
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed an inconsistency among our ports. It seems that not every port
> that installs rc.d startup scripts includes methods to not only startup,
> but also shutdown and/or restart, where appropriate. (Sent to -ports for
> ports hackers' opinions.)
Steve Price wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> # I'm suspecting it might be something missing in the ASN.1 encoding of the
> # certificate, which netscape requires but IE permits. This would be
> # consistent with a missing openssl.cnf file at the time of certificate
> # gen
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
>
> > Any further discussion from you on this point that doesn't include code
> > is totally and completely without value.
> You are correct that I "haven't proven" yet.
. . .
> I'll sit back and wait...
To Unsubscribe:
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > > Actually, I didn't start this. Someone else brought up the idea.
> >
> > ...and quickly decided it was not worthwhile.
>
> Yes, the developers do a good job of repre
Jon Hamilton wrote:
> I've been following this thread at some distance for a while, and I
> don't understand your definition of ``everyone''. Aside from developers,
> who do you feel is a good candidate to track the entire CVS repository, rather
> than using CVSUP or some other method to get onl
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, you wrote:
>
> > I'd like to add that it can be particularly important when legal
> > questions arise.
>
> You confuse the argument for SOME complete repositories with
> the necessity that ALL (or at each most) repositories be so extensive.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> So you guys (core) choose -- do you want 4.x to reap the benefits of
> further SMP development or not? If you choose no, beware that without
> this base cleanup there is *NO* chance whatsoever of any further SMP
> work being MFC'd to 4.x. None. Zilch.
Peter Wemm wrote:
> I hope we haven't changed the server default to stop forwarding.. the
> security risk is to the client, not the remote sshd server, therefore it is
> the client that should decide on whether to forward or not.
I seem to recall the server default being changed, then di
Cameron Grant wrote:
>
> cg 2000/04/18 12:11:39 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/sound/pciemu10k1.c
> Log:
> try the fix from creative bugzilla for nmi problem
>
> Obtained from:creative labs bugzilla
This is definitely an improvement, it doesn't spont
Otter wrote:
> Maybe you should try another audio app.
I plan to do that when I have time to handle a system that might reboot
spontaneously. However I figured Cameron (et al) would want to know
about the rebooting problem with esound (at least for me).
Doug
--
Excess on occasion is e
Cameron Grant wrote:
>
> cg 2000/04/01 23:41:21 PST
>
> Added files:
> sys/dev/sound/pciemu10k1.c emu10k1.h
> Log:
> unfinished sblive driver, playback/mixer only for now - not enabled in
> conf/files
>
> i don't seem to be clearing the cache right resulting in a shor
Christopher Masto wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:52:13AM +0100, Nick Hibma wrote:
> > Are there actually any good reasons why we _should_ upgrade in the first
> > place?
>
> Of course. We now have an obsolete version of Perl. That should be
> reason enough to upgrade.
You haven
John Polstra wrote:
[My silly speculation about cvs lockfiles and cvsup deleted]
> I think you may be misinterpreting the symptoms,
That's entirely possible.
> because I don't know
> of any way for lock files to propagate off of freefall with CVSup.
> All lock files are specifically e
Thanks for the response...
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > src/TODO-2.1, src/usr.sbin/xntpd, etc. There were a large number in
> > contrib, probably detritus from imports, etc. I'm not sure if this
Greetings,
I'm working on a new project and had the need for a clean set of
sources on a new machine. In the course of setting it all up I neglected
to copy over my .cvsrc file which has (amongst other things) 'co -P'. In
checking out the sources for RELENG_4 I ended up with a large numbe
I took another look at this problem, and before I go forward with more
testing I wanted to solicit some comments. The problem is that users who
don't read blindly copy /etc/defaults/rc.conf into /etc. Because of the
recursive call at the end of /etc/defaults/rc.conf when you copy the
file
> "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote:
>
> I accidently deleted my spwd.db on 4.0-stable, how do I recreate it,
> any hints would be appreciated.
Assuming that your master.passwd is up to date, the easiest way is to
do, 'pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd'. That will synch everything up for
you. Th
Brad Knowles wrote:
> When I try to mount my 3.4-STABLE root filesystem on /old, here's
> what I get:
>
> $ mount /old
> mount: /dev/da0s1a on /old: incorrect super block
'fsck -y /dev/da0s1a'
--
"So, the cows were part of a dream that dream
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
>writes:
> : Block/character device collapsing breaking you up now?
> :
> : /dev/ Should only be character devices now.
>
> I was surprised how many block devices were in my /dev when I did a ls
> -l /dev | grep
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 24-Mar-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> >> Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current:
> >
> > I don't know what version of sysinstall you're using, but it builds just
> > fine for me under -current. I saw some other kve
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Dan Moschuk wrote:
> Oops! I've just committed the fix.
No sweat! We're all busy. I'm just glad to see it done. It's
something I've wanted for a long time.
> It probably should be NO_UUCP, but no
> one seems to want to make a final decision on the NOFOO vs. NO_FO
Ray Kohler wrote:
>
> I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway
> if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are
> affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped
> around the NOUUCP knob?
I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message
Dan Moschuk wrote:
>
> Is anyone else seeing odd behaviour with a fairly recent -current, an ep
> driver nic card and fragmented packets?
If I understand things correctly, Matt Dillon and a cast of thousands
just committed a fix to this problem. Try cvsup'ing and make'ing world
and see i
I have a prehistoric version of sysinstall on my otherwise up to date
5.0-Current, and when I used it my system rebooted, so I thought I'd
recompile. Unfortunately 'cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall ; make clean ;
make all' bombed out in kget. More details available on request, but I
thought
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jack
>writes:
> : Today Warner Losh wrote:
> :
> : > boot.flp288
> :
> : The M$ weenies would probably choke on that since they do
> : filenames other than 8.3 with smoke and mirrors.
>
> 8.3 is so archaic these days we shouldn't be bothered
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> But it might actually make a lot of sense to make INVARIANTS the
> default this early in the -CURRENT cycle, protests ?
What kind of overhead does it add? The warning messages in LINT
look rather dire to me, but I'm interested in knowing th
My latest world breakage involves makeinfo on gdb.info. I tried to dig
through the makefile maze to try and get just that bit not to build and
I can't sort it out. Error message below.
Doug
--
"While the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems,
it would be easier s
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > You can't use a foreign plugin with a native freebsd
> > netscape..unfortunately there aren't many plugins available in native
> > format - this is a good reason to use the linux version.
>
> I've noticed that the Linux vers
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:08:55PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Hmm... If I have a PII (Actually celeron 300A) or a PIII, which is
> > better, 'pentium' or 'pentiumpro'? I would think the latter, but I've
> > learned not to assume where gcc is concern
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> Anyone get this beast to work on -current? The audio works, but the video
> doesn't work at all. I have COMPAT_LINUX in my kernel, and RealPlayer 5.0
> works pretty well.
I got disgusted with RP 5 because all of my favorite programs updated
to G2 format, so I nuk
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> Wondering why one would use -mcpu and not -march. If the code runs only on
> Celerons, PII's, and PIII's why would one *not* use -march.
>
> I'm curious about (possible) breakages with -mcpu or -march compared to -Ox
> settings which seem to br
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded my production server to the 4.0-RELEASE and found that
> > squid23 when compiled with -Os option dying with signal 11 on each attempt to
> > load page. When I recompiled it with -O fault disappeared
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> Alas, that is just not true for many of us who are in bandwidth-poor
> countries. Over here, it can take 3 to BIGNUM hours to download an ISO
> image (there aren't any up-to-date local mirrors), depending on time of
> day and the phase of the moon. I
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
> solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem with
install-info was that the system couldn't use the new b
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Strange, I always thought the -current list is for general issues
> related to -current branch and for true kernel hackers exist -hackers.
Ok, now you know differently. No problem. :)
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :)
D'oh!
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
> XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
> time to make a difference.
Not to mention that 4.0 has "issues" with some
hardware/software/e
"Michael L. Imamura" wrote:
>
> I haven't tried xfce, but I had some problems running Enlightenment 16.3,
> all related to shared memory. I disabled shared pixmaps in my Imlib
> configuration and that got rid of the random crashing, but is again not a
> very optimal solution :) I'm guessing it'
Jérome OUFELLA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to use a quite big NFS server, serving ~120GB for ~200
> clients, all OS's mixed (*BSD, Linux, HP-UX, IRIX, Solaris, Xterminals).
>
> Is it worth it to use the -current branch (-release on next monday
> perhaps?) for this important server, or sho
Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm just too dumb... It's my understanding that the
> purpose of the ``NODESCRYPTLINKS'' option in make.conf is
> to prevent overwriting the libcrypt symlinks in /usr/lib.
> Well, it doesn't work.
>
> I cvsupped today in the morning (~ 9:00 UTC on Sunday), added
>
"Michael L. Imamura" wrote:
>
> I was able to get it working through a small patch to the
> scripts/configure file. Probably not the most optimal solution, but it
> works until the port is updated:
>
> --- configure Fri Mar 10 19:20:34 2000
> +++ configure.2 Sat Mar 11 18:19:55 2000
> @@ -197
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
> You could say I reserve the right shoot myself in foot by swapping keyboards.
I think you've made it really clear with all of your many posts that
you want this option. On the other hand, some of us think it's
worthwhile to warn people that swapping keyboard
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:38:44 PST, R Joseph Wright wrote:
>
> > I just built a new world today and openssh does not appear to be
> > installed. I have the directories /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl but they are
> > empty. There is no /usr/bin/ssh.
>
> Last night's ``make world'
Nik Clayton wrote:
> That, at least, was not the case with an upgrade I attempted a few days
> ago. On booting with kernel.GENERIC (from -current) it hung mounting the
> disks. Trying to go back to kernel.stable didn't work, because I'd had
> to update the /dev entries for -current, and they wo
Matt Heckaman wrote:
> Despite the name, mergemaster is not only for merging, it's about the most
> handy tool I've ever come across for make worlds, makes updating configs a
> very easy task indeed. Doug definately deserves a few hundred pats on the
> back for that program.
Well, kind
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > If you give us an idea where your breakage is, we can tell you if it's
> > a known problem. E.g., there is a known problem with PPP(D) and
> > NO_OPENSSL that Kris and I have
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, John Daniels wrote:
> Oops: That's kudos for John *Baldwin,* NOT "Barton." A thousand pardons...
Hey... calling him Barton is a _compliment_!
:)
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: s
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> I've been building and rebuilding in an attempt to make sure that its not
> some stupidity on my part.
>
> Be assured that when I'm positive I've got a reproducable error that I'll
> let everyone in on the details.
If you give us an idea wher
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > > I'm building with NO_OPENSSL and NO_OPENSSH and have still gotten hit with
> > > breakage.
> >
> > I can't fix this if you don't tell me what it is!
>
> What? Nobody else i
William Woods wrote:
>
> Running 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #10: Wed Mar 1 10:25:09 PST 2000 on a
> IBM thinkpad 600E, 128 megs. while doing a make world of todays CVSUP I get
> this:
What command line did you use? This looks to me like 'make -jN'
breakage. I would try the followi
Peter Dufault wrote:
> It's probably almost safe to run a program
> rtprio or idprio if all you do is compute during that time and
> go back to time sharing before doing anything else, but be sure
> you're paged in, don't handle signals that way, etc...
I ran rc5des idprio'ed for well ov
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'm not ready to play with the openssl/ssh stuff yet, but I wanted to
> > test Soren's latest ATA stuff so I cvsup'ed and started a buildworld
> >
Steve Kaczkowski wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade a 3.4 Release box to the latest Release tree,
If you are at 3.4-Release that IS the latest release. If you mean that
you want to upgrade to 3.4-Stable you should look at the stable-supfile
in /usr/share/examples/cvsup.
> *default releas
Howdy,
I'm not ready to play with the openssl/ssh stuff yet, but I wanted to
test Soren's latest ATA stuff so I cvsup'ed and started a buildworld
with the following make.conf options:
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
NOPROFILE= true
NOSUIDPERL= true
NO_OPENSSH= true
NO_OPENSSL= true
RSA
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> This is something which has been requested a fair bit..it will disable the
> building of the DES CRYPT libraries even if you have the crypto sources
> installed, so you can e.g. get OpenSSL/OpenSSH without having to deal with
> the pitfalls of libdescrypt. It seems to wor
Munehiro Matsuda wrote:
>
> Well that does't seem to work for me. Becase mergemaster doesn't use
> NOCRYPT stuff and /usr/src/crypto doesn't exist by default, if you
> just cvsup (or use CTM for my case).
>
> I think checking for crypto is just simple.
It probably will be, but we all ne
I can reliably reproduce this problem with the following lines in
/boot/loader.conf.local
splash_bmp_load="YES"
bitmap_name="/boot/earth.bmp"
bitmap_load="YES"
I have the same VESA and splash screen options in my kernel now
(sources cvsup'ed yesterday) that I did on the system pr
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
>
> At 08:37 PM 2/21/00 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Hrrmm... so you did a clean install from floppies, etc. and the installed
> >version of /etc/group didn't have a $FreeBSD tag? I'm a little confused by
> >your a
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
>
> Nothing major
>
> Finished a build, installed, and mergemaster points out that the $FreeBSD
> line is missing from the /etc/group binary install.
Hrrmm... so you did a clean install from floppies, etc. and the installed
version of /etc/group didn't ha
Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> [ Sent to -current and -ports, followups set to -current ]
>
> Here's another trivial patch that people might like to comment on before I
> commit it. I'm doing more and more FreeBSD installs recently at various
> client sites, and adding "FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS=-p" to make.co
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Victor A. Salaman wrote:
>
> > Don't remove OpenSSL from the three... put the whole thing there, the whole
> > openssl distro in the tree. The problem with the patent is not that you
> > CAN'T get the software, the problem is that you can't build wit
I've finally got up to date on my mail, so I think I'm ready to dive into
following -current. I'm wondering if the below is still a good description
of how to update from a pre-signal changes -current to recent versions?
UPDATING still mentions the xinstall business, but I seem to have gat
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the
> > rationale behind putting openssl into the source anyway? Given the
> > rsa/no rsa problems, not to mention the US vs. the world
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote:
>
> > I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system
> > and stripout parts of it (RSA & IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to
> > have
Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the ration
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
> turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
Here here.
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Un
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> Hmmm. Odd, I've always noted the opposite. If you do the novice install
> (which everyone should if they're trying to test the "typical case"),
I've always found the term "novice" to be a little off-putting. Perhaps
"Standard Install" would be a better choi
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 04:10:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> >
> > > `options XSERVER' is for vt0 only. sc0 doesn't need it to run the X
> > > ser
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> `options XSERVER' is for vt0 only. sc0 doesn't need it to run the X
> server.
Could you add appropriate comments to this effect in GENERIC and
LINT? I have always been confused by this, and IMO the placement in the
file is not sufficient to
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> Far better is:
I knew I should have tested this first
# Mount NFS filesystems.
if mount -d -a -t nfs | grep nfs >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
echo -n "Mounting NFS file systems"
mount -a -t nfs
echo
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I discovered this under 3.4-R, and checked that it's still the case
> for 4.0-RC.
FWIW, in my process of rewriting the rc* scripts I came across
quite a few of these extraneous messages/dependencies/etc. Improving this
situation is "on my lis
"David E. Cross" wrote:
>
> Amitha (the person who has been working on the lockd code) has finished
> most of his work. There are still some issues with handling async locks
> and cancel messages. Also we were not able to implement the full NLM
> protocol as the FreeBSD kernel does not currentl
Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Will Saxon wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, apparently we are supposed to replace a bunch of files is /etc
>
Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, what specifically do you not like about it? I realize
> > that not everyone is going to like/use it, but I am always interested in
> > ways to improve the program.
>
> I don't know about e
Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Will Saxon wrote:
>
> > Well, apparently we are supposed to replace a bunch of files is /etc
> > whenever we make world. There is a command called mergemaster that does
> > this, but the one time i used it (I did not read the directionsvery
> > care
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> >> I think it is necessary to make it exit for now, because what we are
> >> really doing is a net-0 gain in files... turning what used to be
> >> functionality
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf moved.
> :>
> :> make will dump out with an appropriate error and instructions if you
> :> update your source tree and still have an /etc/make.conf.local.
> :
> : I like this change (kind of) but
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> (Approved by jkh)
>
> /etc/make.conf.local will become /etc/make.conf and /etc/make.conf will
> become /etc/defaults/make.conf. This change is long overdue.
>
> The sys.mk adjustment has already been committed. An email has been
> sent to the CVS
801 - 887 of 887 matches
Mail list logo
