On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2019-12-19 19:40, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message , Hans Petter
Sela
sky writes:
On 2019-12-19 17:50, Cy Schubert wrote:
Has anyone else had these since Dec 9?
<4>WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(>lock))WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(>
lock))
panic: page
Hello,
As part of the NUMA and VM concurrency work I have refactored the way page
busy state works in order to improve vm object concurrency. This is a six
patch series that has been tested more in totality than in parts. I will
be committing them back to back after a final universe build
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:43:58AM -1000 I heard the voice of
Jeff Roberson, and lo! it spake thus:
First, I would like to identify whether the wired memory is in the
buffer cache. Can those of you that have a repro look at sysctl
vfs.bufspace
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018, Mark Millard wrote:
As I understand, O. Hartmann's report ( ohartmann at walstatt.org ) in:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-March/068806.html
includes a system with a completely non-ZFS context: UFS only. Quoting that
part:
This is from a APU,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:39:13 +0400
Roman Bogorodskiy schrieb:
Danilo G. Baio wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:36:45PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:16:36AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Tue, Mar
Hi John,
First of all this is really not an appropriate forum for this discussion.
It is really unfortunate that these emails were leaked. However, I think
if you take a careful look at them, you will find a couple examples of
hostility but the great preponderance of them are quite
involved
feature.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Hello folks,
I am working on merging improved NUMA support with policy implemented by
cpuset(2) over the next week. This work has been supported by Dell/EMC's
Isilon product division and Netflix. You can see some
Hello folks,
I am working on merging improved NUMA support with policy implemented by
cpuset(2) over the next week. This work has been supported by Dell/EMC's
Isilon product division and Netflix. You can see some discussion of these
changes here:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13403
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I've created patch, based on earlier work of avg@, to add back pressure to
UMA allocation caches. The problem of physical memory or KVA exhaustion
existed there for many years and it is quite critical now for improving
systems performance
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 18.11.2013 21:11, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Alexander Motin wrote:
I've created patch, based on earlier work of avg@, to add back
pressure to UMA allocation caches. The problem of physical memory or
KVA exhaustion existed
in a different way.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 18 November 2013 11:55, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 18.11.2013 21:11, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Alexander Motin wrote:
I've created patch, based on earlier work of avg@, to add back
pressure to UMA allocation caches. The problem
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:29:44AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
...
The r254025 indeed introduced the problem, and Davide pointed out you a
workaround for the assertion triggering.
Right; I tried one of those -- I hope I got it right...
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
A HEAD@254238 kernel fails to boot in EC2 with
panic: UMA: Increase vm.boot_pages
on 32-CPU instances. Instances with up to 16 CPUs boot fine.
I know there has been some mucking about with VM recently -- anyone want
to claim this, or
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:29:44AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
...
The r254025 indeed introduced the problem, and Davide pointed out you a
workaround for the assertion triggering.
Right; I tried one
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Jim Harris wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
A HEAD@254238 kernel fails to boot in EC2 with
panic: UMA: Increase
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Ruslan Bukin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:50:40PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:44:25PM +0400, Ruslan Bukin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:16:17PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:43:46PM +0400, Ruslan
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Zbyszek Bodek wrote:
On 21.06.2013 01:56, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Zbyszek Bodek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to compile the kernel on my ARMv7 platform using the
sources from the current FreeBSD HEAD.
make
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Zbyszek Bodek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to compile the kernel on my ARMv7 platform using the
sources from the current FreeBSD HEAD.
make buildkernel . -j5
1/2 builds fails in the way described below:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Zbyszek Bodek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to compile the kernel on my ARMv7 platform using the
sources from the current FreeBSD HEAD.
make buildkernel . -j5
1/2 builds fails in the way described below
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, David Wolfskill wrote:
This is on my (i386) build machine; laptop (also i386) did not exhibit
the symptom. I had hand-applied r251953 (to get through buildworld).
After installworld, mergemaster -i, make delete-old, I rebooted, and
this is what I saw:
This is my fault.
On Sun, 12 May 2013, David Wolfskill wrote:
It appears that the issue is i386- (or 32-bit-) specific.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:16:48AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:45:37AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Jim Harris wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam
control blocks for DMA into one central function
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks
for DMA into one central function. This change is a precursor to adding
new features to the I/O stack. It is mostly mechanical. If you are
running current on a raid or scsi
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 14:49 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/loadccb.diff
This patch consolidates all of the functions that map cam control blocks for
DMA into one central
Hello,
As of rev 242815 current has a feature to issue a synchronize cache
command to the drive in between journal records and the metadata they
modify. This should make SUJ more safe in the face of power failure.
This should be considered experimental at this phase. If you wish to try
it
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 11/03/12 15:17, schrieb Mark Felder:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:18:55 +0800
Alie Tan a...@affle.com wrote:
Hi,
No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality.
What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far
I have a small patch to the ULE scheduler that makes a fairly large change
to the way timeshare threads are handled.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/schedslice.diff
Previously ULE used a fixed slice size for all timeshare threads. Now it
scales the slice size down based on load. This should
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 November 2012 14:26, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
I have a small patch to the ULE scheduler that makes a fairly large change
to the way timeshare threads are handled.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/schedslice.diff
Previously ULE
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Hello people!
I have:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (1994.48-MHz K8-class CPU)
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226607 amd64
For example during the building of the port lang/gcc46 in four streams (-j 4)
with a heavy load on the processor
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Andriy Gapon wrote:
This is more of a just for the record email.
I think I've already stated the following observations, but I suspect that they
drowned in the noise of a thread in which I mentioned them.
1. Incorrect topology is built for single-package SMP systems.
That
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to answer me.
? Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:21:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net ?:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Hello people!
I have:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz
Hi Folks,
Kirk, Peter and I have been working hard on SUJ. We still have a few bugs
related to snapshots but we fixed the couple of potential corruption
problems that came up over the last year. If you are not currently using
SUJ I implore you to do so and report any problems you may find..
I did not notice this was still failing. I didn't realize this make
universe would pull in my modules. I will fix this now.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2011-03-23 05:47:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-23 05:47:53
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Mattia Rossi wrote:
On 21/03/11 18:36, Jeff Roberson wrote:
[..]
I would not expect any instability in non ofed systems from this import.
Hi Jeff,
I've tried to compile netstat, and it bails out immediately if I try to make
obj:
/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/Makefile
Hi Folks,
Just a notice that the 1.5.3 OFED Infiniband stack will be committed as
soon as a fresh buildworld/installworld completes on my test machine.
This brings in new drivers and user code and a very small number of
changes to system sources. OFED will not be built by default and
Hello,
I have lost track of what bugs are pesently outstanding in SUJ. If you
have experienced a problem that prevented you from using SUJ please try
again and report your issue to me directly. I don't always have the time
to read current@ so mails sent without cc will get more attention.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, John Doe wrote:
Boot into single user-mode
# tunefs -j enable /
# tunefs -j enable /usr
# tunefs -j enable /tmp
# tunefs -j enable /var
# reboot
The machine then panics.
Looks like the machine is trying to write to a read-only filesystem.
Can you please give me
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
I've been using -CURRENT last update in February for quite a long time
and few weeks ago decided to finally update it. The update was quite
unfortunate as system became
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 12/05/2010 kl. 22.44 skrev Jeff Roberson:
I think Peter Holm also saw this once while we were testing SUJ and reproduced
~30 second hangs with stock sources. At this point we need to brainstorm ideas
for adding debugging instrumentation
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
I've been using -CURRENT last update in February for quite a long time
and few weeks ago decided to finally update it. The update was quite
unfortunate as system became very unstable: it just hangs few times a
day and panics sometimes.
Some
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:45:28 + (UTC)
From: Jeff Roberson j...@freebsd.org
To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org,
svn-src-h...@freebsd.org
Subject: svn commit: r208241 - head/sbin/tunefs
Author: jeff
Date: Tue May 18 01:45:28 2010
New
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org:
On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Hi Vladimir,
I checked in a fix for this at revision 207742. If you can verify that it
works for you it would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Jeff
for tunefs.
Thanks,
Jeff
Applied and restarted portupgrade.
Will tell you tomorrow.
Fabien
Le 6 mai 2010 ? 00:54, Jeff Roberson a ?crit :
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better
than what I was able to garner. I was
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the
feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it
alone, or it will be set at install time and then not
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better
than what I was able to garner. I was
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Before sending the 'bad' part i would like to say that it is very useful and
save me a lot of time after a crash.
I've updated the ports and there was no more space on the FS.
It end up with this backtrace (After one reboot the kernel
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
This is a problem with snapshots and the journal full condition. I will
address it shortly.
Thanks,
Jeff
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
...
#0 0xc056b93c in doadump ()
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've started seeing a panic Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable
Hello,
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following
bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
1) panic on gnome start via softdep_cancel_link().
2) Difficulty setting flags on /. This can only be done from a direct
boot into single user but there were
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 19:47:00 Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote:
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie diks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
Thank you for the report with stack. That was very helpful. I know how
to fix this bug but it will take me a day or two as my primary test
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling.
I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs
9-CURRENT r207195 (i386).
Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Gary Jennejohn
gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Jeff Roberson escreveu:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
unclean shutdown. SUJ may be enabled with tunefs -j enable and disabled
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xff00eebfaca0
ad0: 35772MB IBM-DPTA-353750 [72680/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xff00eebfa4a0
ad4: 35304MB WDC WD360GD-00FNA0 [71730/16/63] at
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote:
Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels:
# /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 21' /dev/null
Real UserSys
UP kernel 38m33.29s 27m10.09s 10m59.15s
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Paulius Bulotas wrote:
Hello,
when building kernel:
../../../vm/uma_core.c: In function `zone_timeout':
../../../vm/uma_core.c:345: error: `mp_maxid' undeclared (first use in
this function)
and so on.
Anything I missed?
I just fixed this, sorry.
Paulius
On 27 Nov 2003, Christian Laursen wrote:
Since upgrading from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-BETA, I've been
experiencing hard lockups once or twice every day.
I managed to get a trace by enabling the watchdog, which
put me into the debugger. This is the trace:
db trace
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
If I build attached kmod and kldload/-unload it on a GENERIC kernel w/
SMP apic it'll error out:
Zone was not empty (xx items). Lost X pages of memory.
This is on a p4 HTT, but seems reproducible on proper SMP systems as
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
Here is the stack backtrace:
Thanks, this is known and is actually safe. We're pursuing ways to quiet
these warnings.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc1da318c vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323
2nd 0xc0724900 swap_pager swhash
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background
but I see every new object file in form of a picture
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote:
This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you
give me an example including what applications you're running
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hi,
from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, David Xu wrote:
Jun Su wrote:
I noticed that Jeff Roberson implement this already. Is whi will be commit?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1531
I google this because I found this feature is listed in the list of Kernel
Improvement of WindowsXP. :-)
Thanks,
Jun Su
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote:
The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments
when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations
or when doing compile jobs and such.
The second part of
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Alex Wilkinson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Just for those interested:
I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when
my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Just for those interested:
I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when
my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and
forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHED_ULE
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
You commented on the nice cutoff before. What do you believe the correct
behavior is? In ULE I went to great lengths to be certain that I emulated
the old behavior of denying nice +20 processes cpu time
for the report.
Cheers,
Jeff
If you need me to do anything to track this down, let me know. I am, and
have always been, running with moused, on a uniprocessor box (ThinkPad
T21 1ghz p3).
Best regards,
/Eirik
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Bruno Van Den Bossche wrote:
Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I have commited my SMP fixes. I would appreciate it if you could post
update results. ULE now outperforms 4BSD in a single threaded kernel
compile and performs almost identically in a 16 way make. I still
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Schnoopay wrote:
Are you using moused? Is this SMP or UP? What CPUs are you using?
Thanks,
Jeff
I am having similar problems after my last cvsup (10-31-03) also using a
USB MS Intellimouse. Mouse is slow to respond under ULE but fine under
4BSD. The
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
Test for scheduling buildworlds:
cd /usr/src/usr.bin
for i in obj depend all
do
MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i
done /tmp/zqz 21
(Run
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Bruno Van Den Bossche wrote:
Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
Test for scheduling buildworlds:
cd /usr/src/usr.bin
for i in obj depend all
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Michal wrote:
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Oct 30 17:49:13 EST 2003
When kernel compiled with SCHED_ULE, USB mouse (MS USB Intellimouse) is
almost unusable. Even if CPU is idle, mouse feels sticky. When loading
mozilla or compiling comething mouse freezes for several
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
Test for scheduling buildworlds:
cd /usr/src/usr.bin
for i in obj depend all
do
MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i
done /tmp/zqz 21
(Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj. The all stage
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
is not even competitive in my simple tests.
...
At one point ULE was at least as fast
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2003 12:06 pm, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi,
I just cvsupped and built a new kernel that includes sched_ule.c 1.67. I'm
getting a page fault when working in Mozilla Firebird. It happens pretty
soon, after opening one or
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
is not even competitive in my simple tests.
[scripts results deleted]
Summary: SCHED_ULE was more than twice as slow as SCHED_4BSD for the
obj and depend stages. These stages
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
is not even competitive in my simple tests.
...
At one point ULE was at least
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
I think you cvsup'd at a bad time. I fixed a bug that would have
caused the system to lock up in this case late last night. On my
system it freezes for a few seconds and then returns. I can stop
that by turning down the interactivity
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
I just cvsupped and installed a new world and kernel (previous kernel was from
October 13), and now my machine gets a page fault when I try to run any GTK2
application (Firebird, Gnome 2). Are others seeing this as well?
Arjan
If you're running
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Valentin Chopov wrote:
I'm getting an error in the sched_ule.c
It looks that sched_add is called with struct kse arg. instead of
struct thread
Fixed, thanks.
Thanks,
Val
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstri
I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
stopped it from working very well.
Things should be much improved. Feedback, as always, is welcome. I'd
like to look into making this the default scheduler
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Eirik Oeverby wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
stopped it from working very well.
Things should be much
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
stopped it from working very well.
Things should be much
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under
some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running
afterwards.
Thanks for the fix! However
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 21:27, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors
under some load
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under
some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running
afterwards.
I'm going to look into the reports of some problems with nice, although I
suspect that they could have been caused by the same issues.
HTT is
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote:
My notebook was a little bit panic this night. After rebooting I found
this message in my system log:
panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
?
When are your sources from?
Regards,
Oliver Fischer
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Brendon and Wendy wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the talk about sched_ule, nvidia driver, moused and pauses...
I was running -current up until about a month ago, using the nvidia
driver, sched_bsd on a dual ht xeon, with htt disabled. Mouse
interactivity with moused was terrible
I have reproduced the lagging mouse issue on my laptop. I tried moused to
no effect. Eventually, I grudgingly installed kde and immediately started
encountering problems with mouse lag. It would seem that twm was not
stressing my machine in the same ways that kde is. ;-)
I suspect a problem
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo