Re: r245741 (clang as cc) can not build binaries for GEODE processor

2013-02-22 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:45:58 +0400, Lev Serebryakov a écrit : Hello, > Hello, Daniel. > You wrote 22 февраля 2013 г., 16:04:11: > > DN> I'm not familiar with NanoBSD, but does it do the package builds > DN> for you - or do you do those by hand? > DN> If it's the latter, I don't quite understand

Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

2012-09-11 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:12:07 -0500, Brooks Davis a écrit : Hello, > For the past several years we've been working towards migrating from > GCC to Clang/LLVM as our default compiler. We intend to ship FreeBSD > 10.0 with Clang as the default compiler on i386 and amd64 platforms. > To this end, w

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

2012-08-23 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:27:13 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : Hello, > > So, opinions? There may still be time to fix it for 9.1 if we can > > decide quickly. > > > I do personnally have no opinion on this, I have hesitated long > between both before choosing /usr/sbin/pkg. > > I'm interest

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-29 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:58:53 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote: > > So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by > > HPLIP/cups on FreeBSD 9 ? > > > And, how to handle them with devd ? > > Use devfs rules. > > Pastin

Re: 9.0 RC1/Clang / illegal instruction (Signal 4) in gengtype while building cc_tools on i586.

2011-10-23 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:11:05 +0200, Roman Divacky a écrit : > > Long nops are supported only on specific CPUs. Unconditional use of > > them is a plain bug, like unconditional use of cmovXX. > > Yes, it's a bug, I filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11212 > upstream. Patric, as a temporar

Re: 9.0 RC1/Clang / illegal instruction (Signal 4) in gengtype while building cc_tools on i586.

2011-10-22 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:51:29 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit : > On my Soekris net5501 (AMD Geode i586 CPU) clang make buildworld fails > on an illegal instruction "nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)". I've found a test program from Roman Divacky to check the CPU as clang

9.0 RC1/Clang / illegal instruction (Signal 4) in gengtype while building cc_tools on i586.

2011-10-22 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Hello, On my Soekris net5501 (AMD Geode i586 CPU) clang make buildworld fails on an illegal instruction "nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)". # make buildworld ... ranlib libiberty.a clang -O2 -pipe -I. -DGCCVER=\"4.2\" -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_too

update from old current (october) to 9.0 beta fails in installworld

2011-08-02 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Hello, Looks like I've broke my soekris net5501 while doing installworld (built with clang) ===> libexec/rtld-elf (install) chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 -C -b -fschg -S ld-elf.so.1 /libexec install -o root -g wheel -m 444 rtld.1.gz /usr/share/man/ma

pflow(4) in 9.0 ?

2011-08-01 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Hello, Will pflow(4) be available on 9.0 ? There is a "if_pflow.h" in pf's code but no manual page. Thanks, regards. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

2010-11-16 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:36:42 -0500, Jung-uk Kim a écrit : > Often times I hear complaints like "my Mac hangs after upgrading to > 8.1" or "snapshot CD hangs on my brand new Mac". I know some of > these complaints started happening when we switched to new PAT > layout. It is so puzzling becau

Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations

2010-06-13 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:35:12 +0200, Bernd Walter a écrit : > Go back to the originating mail. > Crypto code wasn't aware of this problem and this is a way more > obviuous optimization than function exchange. > And I do believe that the programmers were clever people. > Alarming, isn't it? The re