On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Archy Cho wrote:
Hello
I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance with
netmap ,
since I am currently using freebsd as core routers instead of cisco.
I tried to re-compile the freebsd 8.2 kernel to test ,
however , I could not complete
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
me
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
a bit premature.
However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
minimal and it
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
On 7/20/2011 5:35 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't
work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date
admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:27:53AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/07/2011 21:11 Nathan Whitehorn said the following:
On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
AFAICT, it is a cpu affinity issue. If I
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
modified ixgbe
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
works on 8_STABLE.
But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
Just
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
works on 8_STABLE.
But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
works on 8_STABLE
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
works on 8_STABLE.
But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
Just to be clear, I'm not looking for a solution about the port here, I'm
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while
13 matches
Mail list logo
