[trimming the list of recipients]
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:08 PM Miranda Maria Sophie Van den
Breukelingen wrote:
>
> works for me as far as pairing concernes (with patch -C > .diff.txt
>
> option LOCK_PROFILING
> option WITNESS
>
> is on in kern.config. My problem presists in
>> > patch -p1 worked for me to apply it.
>> >
>> > And it worked just fine for everything once I rebooted. The patch looked
>> > fine to my eye.
>>
>> thanks Warner
>>
>> please find attached (more complete) patch that should address issue
>> of holding lock over copyin/out (or so i claim).
>
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:48 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> patch -p1 worked for me to apply it.
>
> And it worked just fine for everything once I rebooted. The patch looked fine
> to my eye.
thanks Warner
please find attached (more complete) patch that should address issue
of holding lock over
> > > Hmm... interesting
> > >
> > > I only took a brief look at it. I suppose I can ensure user space address
> > > is wired and then copyout() can be called with mutex held
> >
> > >No, you cannot do this, at least without making the kernel to panic.
> > User might unmap the wired mapping
> > Hmm... interesting
> >
> > I only took a brief look at it. I suppose I can ensure user space address
> > is wired and then copyout() can be called with mutex held
>
> >No, you cannot do this, at least without making the kernel to panic.
> User might unmap the wired mapping at any time
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> Is it from read_connection_list? If so I have a 'patch' that I'm using but
> haven't committed because it's just too gross: drop the lock before the
> copyout and pick it up again after...
>
Hmm... interesting
I only took a brief
Graham,
> Last night I updated to the latest -current source and did a build of world
> and kernel. The problem seems to have disappeared! So, either there was
> something broken in the source when I did my previous update, or something
> went wrong in my last build/install. Either way, it's all
Graham,
can you also please try to start it manually and see where it stops?
i.e. something like
# sh -x /etc/rc.d/bluetooth start ubt0
>>>
>>> Thanks for responding. The output of that command is below. I'll do some
>>> more diagnosis when I get home tonight.
>>
>> +
Graham,
>> can you also please try to start it manually and see where it stops?
>> i.e. something like
>>
>> # sh -x /etc/rc.d/bluetooth start ubt0
>
> Thanks for responding. The output of that command is below. I'll do some
> more diagnosis when I get home tonight.
thanks a lot
[...]
> +
Hi Graham
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Graham Menhennitt
wrote:
> I've been running 11-current AMD64 on this machine for about a year. It
> has a bluetooth dongle that has worked correctly up until a week ago. I
> updated to the latest source around then, so I
Andriy,
i have a question about obtaining minidump as result of panic() being
called from nmi handler. basically, i have a way to trigger nmi, and,
i would like to panic() system and obtain a minidump.
i have modified isa_nmi() to appropriately inspect bits and return
non-zero return code.
hello,
i have a question about obtaining minidump as result of panic() being
called from nmi handler. basically, i have a way to trigger nmi, and,
i would like to panic() system and obtain a minidump.
i have modified isa_nmi() to appropriately inspect bits and return
non-zero return code. i have
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:18 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
This patch converts the netgraph bluetooth codee from timeout(9) to
callout(9). The patch is against HEAD but probably applies to 9 and 10 as
well.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/bluetooth_callout.patch
looks fine
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:05 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:29:32 pm Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
I think this is fine.
While you are at it, can you test this patch to remove D_NEEDGIANT?
Index
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
==
Index: subr_devstat.c
===
--- subr_devstat.c (revision 263311)
+++ subr_devstat.c (working copy)
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@
mtx_assert(devstat_mutex, MA_NOTOWNED);
if (!once) {
hello,
would anyone object to this patch?
max
Index: src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd
===
--- src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd (revision 2999)
+++ src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd (working copy)
@@ -39,4 +39,7 @@
pidfile=/var/run/${name}.pid
Hello Aleksandr
would anyone object to this patch?
It is good idea, but sometimes shutdown sequence longer than some H/W
watchdogs even support.
I have one board which can do only 20sec maximum time.
yes. its up to the user to configure appropriate watchdog timeout.
this features is mostly
Hello Allan
I've been seeing an issue where sometimes my system seems to hang after
the shutdown. where not stopping the watchdog might help. I wonder if it
would be best to make some kind of rc.conf variable to allow the user to
opt for one or the other, keeping the current behaviour for
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 17/12/2013 20:53 Maksim Yevmenkin said the following:
hello,
would anyone object to this patch?
max
Index: src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd
===
--- src/etc/rc.d
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote this message on Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 15:39 -0700:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:52 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote this message on Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:17 -0700
hello,
i would like to submit the attached bioq patch for review and
comments. this is proof of concept. it helps with smoothing disk read
service times and arrear to eliminates outliers. please see attached
pictures (about a week worth of data)
- c034 control unmodified system
- c044 patched
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Eric van Gyzen e...@vangyzen.net wrote:
Maksim,
The graphs were not attached. Perhaps the list stripped them. Could you
post them on the web instead?
err... sorry about it.. please try
http://people.freebsd.org/~emax/c034.png
On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:52 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote this message on Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:17 -0700:
i would like to submit the attached bioq patch for review and
comments. this is proof of concept. it helps with smoothing disk read
service times
Hi Adrian !
Thank you for your work. I briefly looked at it and it seems fine to me. I'm
not able to give it a proper review as I'm traveling internationally currently.
Having said all that, I think it would be reasonable to commit it as is into
head.
Thanks,
Max
On Apr 3, 2013, at 10:52
Hi Adrian,
Please find a patch which does two things:
patch was lost, apparently :)
thanks
max
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:11:25AM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
i would like to get some reviews, opinions and/or comments
Hello,
i would like to get some reviews, opinions and/or comments on the patch below.
a little bit background, as far as i understand, cluster_read() can
initiate two disk i/o's: one for exact amount of data being requested
(rounded up to a filesystem block size) and another for a configurable
hello,
would anyone object to the following small patch?
==
Index: vm_pageout.c
===
--- vm_pageout.c(revision 248560)
+++ vm_pageout.c(working copy)
@@ -882,14 +882,17 @@
vm_pageout_init_marker(marker,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:15:54AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:16:17PM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
M hello,
M
M for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G
M
hello,
for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G
interfaces lie about their ifi_baudrate. i would like to propose
simple (hopefuly) change to address this.
quick summary of the problem:
struct if_data {
...
u_char ifi_spare_char1;/* spare byte */
Michael,
Something in -current and recently MFC'd to -stable is causing all of my
gmirror drives to rebuild on reboot :-(
Being remote and these being production machines, I suspect SVN r237929
and r237930 in -current and SVN r238500 to -stable but haven't yet been
able to prove it.
Is
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin
maksim.yevmen...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael,
Something in -current and recently MFC'd to -stable is causing all of my
gmirror drives to rebuild on reboot :-(
Being remote
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin
maksim.yevmen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin
maksim.yevmen
hello,
any objections to the following patch?
===
Index: mibII_tcp.c
===
--- mibII_tcp.c (revision 236265)
+++ mibII_tcp.c (working copy)
@@ -109,10 +109,12 @@
ptr = (struct xinpgen *)(void *)((char *)ptr +
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
===
Index: uma_core.c
===
--- uma_core.c (revision 616)
+++ uma_core.c (working copy)
@@ -267,10 +267,7 @@
static void
bucket_enable(void)
{
- if (cnt.v_free_count
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
==
--- sys/module_khelp.h (revision 582)
+++ sys/module_khelp.h (working copy)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
.priv = kmd_##hname\
};
Hello,
i have a question for fs wizards.
suppose i can persuade modern spinning disk to do large reads (say
512K to 1M) at a time. also, suppose file system on such modern
spinning drive is used to store large files (tens to hundreds of
megabytes). is there any way i can tweak the file system
Dear -hackers,
can someone please enlighten me as to why maxio is not set by mps(4),
and, what would be a reasonable number to set it to if i felt inclined
to do so? default DFLTPHYS of 64K seems a bit low to me.
thanks,
max
___
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/17/11 01:08, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17.11.2011 00:44, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motinm
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/17/11 18:35, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/17/11 01:08, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Alexander Motin m
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/17/11 19:02, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 11/17/11 18:35, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/17/11 01:08, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16
hello,
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c 2011-11-16 21:35:41.0 +
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@
for (unit = 0; unit ctlr-channels; unit++) {
if ((ctlr-ichannels (1 unit)) == 0)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi.
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c 2011-11-16 21:35:41.0 +
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17.11.2011 00:44, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch
Hello,
On a Dell E6400 the bluetooth wireless minicard (Dell 370 = BCM2046B1
if i am right) does not attach to any driver.
Is this ship supported by the btbcmfw driver?
Any comment would be helpfull.
did you try to load ng_ubt(4) driver? also freebsd-bluetooth@ is
probably more appropriate
Please try fw dowloader from
Http://people.freebsd.org/~emax/ath3kfw.tar.gz
Thanks,
Max
On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote:
Hi,
I have built-in bluetooth atheros. On ubuntu linux it is shown as (lsusb):
Bus 003 Device 006: ID 0cf3:3002 Atheros
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
In kernel and userspace this is currently a feature in the HID libraries.
And I agree that maybe this should be changed. Before changing anything please
grep the kernel sources for this function and check that no
hello,
[trying current@ first to get wider audience :)]
so, i have a somewhat silly question about libusbhid. please consider
the following code
hid_data_t d;
hid_item_t h;
for (d = hid_start_parse(desc, 1 hid_input, -1); hid_get_item(d, h) 0; ) {
...
}
hid_end_parse(d);
the idea
Dear Hackers,
got this LOR this morning. sorry if already known/fixed.
beetle% uname -a
FreeBSD beetle.digisle.com 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sat Nov 1
00:35:49 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEETLE i386
beetle%
lock order reversal
1st 0xc1ea534c inp (inp) @
Hello Warner,
Oops, my bad. Please review attched patch. If there are no objections
I will commit it in a few hours. Also if someone else could commit it
sooner it would be nice :)
thanks,
max
--- Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Smith wrote:
Maksim,
I have just done a
Hi Guys,
i'd like to commit attached patch. the purpose is to connect etc/bluetooth
and share/examples/netgraph/bluetooth to the build. please review and let
me know if i missed anything.
thanks,
max
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved
Simon,
i'd like to commit attached patch. the purpose is to connect etc/bluetooth
and share/examples/netgraph/bluetooth to the build. please review and let
me know if i missed anything.
Index: src/etc/bluetooth/Makefile
Peter,
I'm currently thinking about un-Netgraph'ing FreeBSD code to make it
portable
to other BSD style systems. I'm trying to look at other implementations
and learn as much as i can. In particular i'm trying to figure out how to
minimize OS dependent code and what is the right
Dear Hackers,
Does anyone know if Apple has released Darwin/OSX Bluetooth code to the
public? Quick look at http://www.opensource.apple.com/ did not reveal
anything particularly useful (although i did not try really hard :)
I'm currently thinking about un-Netgraph'ing FreeBSD code to make it
Dear Hackers,
In the next few hours i will be committing Bluetooth patch.
The patch was reviewed by M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After commit i will re-cvsup my system and will do a full
buildworld (could take 4-6 hours) to make sure everything
works.
Expect
John,
[...]
: Julian and Ruslan are busy at the moment. M. Warner Losh has sent
e-mail
: to core@ and asked for commit bit for me. in the mean time i'd like to
: commit this and resolve all issues in time for 5.2-RELEASE.
:
: I can give it a go if no one else wants to do it.
Hi John,
I have prepared Bluetooth mega patch for FreeBSD source tree. This patch
updates FreeBSD sources to the most recent snapshot.
[...]
The patch could be downloaded from
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/patch/bluetooth20030914.diff.gz
I had a look at the patch and here is
Dear Hackers,
I have prepared Bluetooth mega patch for FreeBSD source tree. This patch
updates FreeBSD sources to the most recent snapshot. The patch is quite
extensive - it adds two new libraries (libbluetooth and libsdp) as well
as puts some files into /etc/bluetooth and modifies quite a few
Hello Gary,
It seems when using rfcomm_pppd (at least) as a Bluetooth - LAN
gateway there is a fairly large memory leak which eventually crashes
the box running the ppp server. To track down where, I recorded the
output of kern.malloc every minute until the box crashed. At the
start of
[cc'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for archive purposes ]
Hello Victor,
I hope you don't mind me asking you directly: maybe the -current
mailing list is more appropriate?
no, i do not mind, but cc to -current or -net is a good idea.
I'm trying to use a FreeBSD PC (5.1-CURRENT, with the bluetooth
Tobias,
After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still
around
and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
kickass! I will try it out later today
:)
Here is the list of things I'm planing to do next:
o Prepare patches for FreeBSD source tree
o Write SDP
Dear Hackers,
After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still around
and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030908.tar.gz
Here is quick summary:
o ng_hci(4) and ng_l2cap(4) kernel modules were changed to fix issue with
Brent,
Does anyone know if it's possible to use a Microsoft Bluetooth mouse
5.1?
you need to have Bluetooth HID (Human Interface Device) support. someone
wrote me an e-mail a while ago asking the same question. i tried to explain
Bluetooth HID and how it works. its not a rocket science - you
Hello Kim,
Trying to get Max Yevmenkin's bluetooth stack running on 5.1-release.
This with ngbt-fbsd-20030501.tar.gz from
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/
first of all - all kernel modules and user space tools were committed to
-current. so you do not have to use snapshots. all kernel
Hello Kim,
Have bluetooth almost working on 5.1-release, thank you Max.
[...]
The device is a Belkin F8T001, at plugin it logs:
Aug 17 16:43:01 radio kernel: ubt0: Broadcom Corp. BCM2033, rev 1.01/0.a0,
addr 2
Aug 17 16:43:01 radio kernel: ubt0: Interface 0 endpoints: interrupt=0x81,
Hello,
please disconnect usr.bin/bluetooth and usr.sbin/bluetooth from the build
for now. i'm working on the patch to fix this. sorry about this.
thanks,
max
TB --- 2003-06-24 17:27:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-06-24 17:27:15 - checking out the source tree
Tobias,
I just wanted to let you know that I got the integrated bluetooth
device in my IBM T30 to work (yes, I am sending this mail from my
T30 via bluetooth via my Ericsson T68i and GPRS
cool :) i'm glad you made it working :)
Thanks to Pav and Max for all the fabulous work and help!
Hello,
--- User Toyboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the information, I can now surf the internet from my laptop via
bluetooth. I will put up a page on how to do it, even though there are
i'm very glad it works for you :)
already a few pages on it already. The problem with my setup
Hello,
--- User Toyboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again, all information you have given me has been very helpful. ButI
have messed up somewhere while setting up the rcfomm_pppd section and I
don't know where the problem is. I have setup my ppp.conf like this:
[section skipped]
please
Hello,
Did you download firmware into the device? Broadcom BCM2033 chip based
device will not work without firmware. The snapshot comes with firmware
download driver ubtbcmfw(4) and firmware download utility bcmfw(8). In
order to make Broadcom device work you need to
1) load ubtbcmfw.ko module
Hello,
Hello, I downloaded the latest bluetooth stack from 20030604 and I am
running 5.1 release which was also tagged on 20030604 and I followed the
steps to compile bluetooth which was make depend make make install
make cleandir in src/usr.bin/bluetooth/ but it fails at make with:
===
Hello,
--- User Toyboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that help, it worked, I have one more question, Is it possible to
share my internet connection on my FreeBSd box that has bluetooth on it
with other devices with bluetooth like my laptop? I looked at
Dear Hackers,
please find attached patch for the hcsecd(8) Bluetooth link keys/PIN
codes management daemon. this patch is against the latest release
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030604.tar.gz
hcsecd(8) is now able to cache link keys that were generated from the
PIN codes. to
Dear Hackers,
Another release is available for download at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030604.tar.gz
I am regret to announce that this is probably the last release.
My company has announced that they will pull out of USA and i
will most likely loose my job.
Unless i find
Hello,
just in case re@ or a maintainer finds this worhtwhile :
from my /etc/rc.conf :
ifconfig_tap0=lladdr 00:90:27:3f:12:9f
apm_enable=YES
apmd_enable=YES
This gives me in dmesg-a (today's CVS) :
1)
Dear Hackers,
[ for archive purposes ]
all the USB stack debug traces are available at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/usb/
i also managed to get USB dumps from W2K that runs on the same laptop.
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/usb/USB_HUB.LOG
trace when W2K attach the second hub
Lee,
Kernel recompiled and now no more _mtx_assert undefined errors.
Continuing with the directions at
http://www.oook.cz/bsd/bluetooth.html:
When I press the T30's bluetooth button I get the known USB problem,
but never see the ubt0 device defined. Instead of getting
ubt0: vendor 0x0a12
Hello Lee,
I'm playing with Bluetooth on my T30 as well. I've activated legacy
USB support in BIOS, but still get
Mar 26 08:41:03 tylendel kernel: uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1
maybe 45-60 seconds after pressing the Bluetooth button.
I'm running a kernel and world sup'd yesterday
Tobias,
yes it is a CSR chip based device. can you tell if its a USB device?
yes, it is usb. windows clearly states it as usb.
good. then you will most likely get it to work. if you
get it to attach (see below).
1) at loader prompt type (without quotes) boot -v
2) do not press the Bluetooth
Larry,
[...]
Mar 25 21:59:36 angel5 kernel: uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1
I had a similar (USB) issue on my Fujitsu Laptop, until I **ENABLED**
the USB Floppy
option in my BIOS. Don't ask me why that fixed it, but ANY USB device I
plugged in would
garner the above response without
Dear Hackers,
Does anyone know what is the proper handling for USB IOERROR status
in USB transfer callback?
here is my problem. the driver opens bulk pipe and submits incoming
USB bulk transfer. the USB device is detached while the transfer is
still pending and pipe is still open. USB transfer
Hello Takahiko,
[...]
well, i did some research on that. it turns out Broadcom Bluetooth
chip based devices require firmware download. in particular the
device you have (Vendor ID 0x0a5c/Product ID 0x2033) uses special
procedure to download firmware file, i.e. you have to download
mini-driver
Hello Takahiko,
[...]
OK, I checked my copy of 2003-03-05. It only has sys. I'd download latest
2003-03-05 on your directory. I've rebuild environment.
good
[...]
ugen0: Broadcom product 0x2033, rev 1.01/0.a0, addr 2
I just mistake device name, it not BW-BH02U. true name is
Hello Takahiko,
At first, I installed 5-CURRENT on P3 machine and sync with cvsup to
latest. and overwrite 2003-03-05 maksim's bluetooth modules.
please verify that tarball you have downloaded has both kernel
and userland stuff, i.e. you have sys, share, usr.bin and usr.sbin
in the
Hello Christian,
[...]
Are there any undertakings on the way to update the bluetooth code
in -CURRENT to a newer snapshot?
As soon as I get at least few positive feedbacks from the testers
Julian will commit it :) I do not feel comfortable to commit the
code that has only been tested on the
Hello Pav,
[ CC'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
To all FreeBSD Bluetooth users
Please do not hesitate to ask questions! No question is too dumb.
When asking questions please CC to one of the FreeBSD mailing lists.
mobile@, net@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems like a good choice.
This way your
Dear Hackers,
I'm very pleased to announce that another release is available for
download at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030305.tar.gz
The Bluetooth sockets layer has been cleaned up. People should not
see any WITNESS complains with new code. Locking issues have been
Hello Dustin,
1) compile and install hcidump from the snapshot's ports/ directory
Recompiled and reinstalled. All went fine.
good
2) make sure you have clean setup, i.e.
- run # rc.bluetooth stop device
- disconnect the device from the PC
- reset mouse
- connect device back to PC
-
Dustin,
This is probably where I'm going to have to stop for the week to make sure
I get my classwork done, you've been a wonderful guide. I can't wait to
get started working on this some more.
no problem. thanks for your time :)
[...]
bottom line: baseband + L2CAP works. you can talk to your
Dear Poul-Henning,
i think the following is not correct
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_device.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 ng_device.c
--- netgraph/ng_device.c2 Feb 2003 13:30:00 - 1.2
+++ netgraph/ng_device.c2 Mar 2003 19:48:38 -
-66,7 +66,7
Dear Hackers,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 22:18:12 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Interestingly, socreate() in Lite2 always does a can-wait malloc() so
our current soalloc(M_NOWAIT) does the same thing as Lite2 and is only
wrong if the FreeBSD change from can-wait to can-wait-if p
Bruce,
Please find the attached patch for socreate() in uipc_socket.c.
I think the code was supposed to call soalloc(0) rather then
soalloc(M_NOWAIT). Note M_NOWAIT defined as 1.
Is that a real typo or i'm missing something here?
soalloc(1) was intended (and was obtained by misspelling 1 as
Dear Hackets,
Please find the attached patch for socreate() in uipc_socket.c.
I think the code was supposed to call soalloc(0) rather then
soalloc(M_NOWAIT). Note M_NOWAIT defined as 1.
Is that a real typo or i'm missing something here?
thanks,
max
--- uipc_socket.c.orig Thu Feb 27 15:24:52
Dear Hackers,
I need an expert's advice on the small locking/WITNESS problem
(if this is a real problem of course). It basically boils down
to the following:
Consider three (3) MTX_DEF mutexes: A, B1 and B2. Mutex A has a
name mutex_A and type type_A. Mutex B1 has a name mutex_B1
and mutex B2
Dear Hackers,
Does WITNESS keeps track of particular mutex instance or
just places where particular mutex type was acquired and
released? Is it even possible to keep track of individual
instance of the particular mutex type?
Here is my problem. In my code (Bluetooth sockets layers)
each
Dear Hackers,
I'm very pleased to announce that another engineering release
is available for download at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030210.tar.gz
Note: This release has new tree layout that matches FreeBSD
source tree.
Quick summary of changes
- New in-kernel RFCOMM
Dear Hackers,
During the testing process for the new in-kernel RFCOMM Bluetooth
code my not so -current panic()ed with the trace below. This panic
happend while ~2MB FTP transfer (PPP over new RFCOMM over
Bluetooth).
A little detail - new RFCOMM code opens L2CAP sockets from inside
kernel (very
Dear Warner and Hackers,
Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) devd can
prevent sio driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
that has PCCARD_FUNCTION_SERIAL?
From what i understand devd can load driver modules,
but it only comes to play when card is not recognized,
right?
The particular
Dear Warner and Hackers,
--- M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Dear Warner and Hackers,
:
: Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) devd can
: prevent sio driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
Dear Warner and Hackers,
--- M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: :
: : Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) devd can
: : prevent sio driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
: : that has
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo