Also, the other reason for the panics wasn't because of the kernel
but for some reason, unless I do "chflags noschg /usr/lib" prior to the
installworld target, it seems like the libs with the version number in the
filename will notget overwritten. libc.so gets overwritten but libc.so.5
do
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> On 30-Jul-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> However, those boxes were panicing ofte
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:06:49 -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that's the weird part... I thought adding a DDB_UNATTENDED
> > as a option would atleast make it reboot or something...
>
> For the record, DDB_UNATTENDED is mostly pointless. It jus
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 02:51:58 EST, David Scheidt wrote:
> Well, my current startup panic only happens at cold boot. After it panics
> the first time, it boots fine. If DDB_UNATTENED isn't set, it hangs trying
> to enter DDB.
!!!
That's a problem. Like I said, DDB_UNATTENDED is _mostly_ usel
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
:
:
:On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:06:49 -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
:
:> Yeah, that's the weird part... I thought adding a DDB_UNATTENDED
:> as a option would atleast make it reboot or something...
:
:For the record, DDB_UNATTENDED is mostly pointless. It ju
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:06:49 -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> Yeah, that's the weird part... I thought adding a DDB_UNATTENDED
> as a option would atleast make it reboot or something...
For the record, DDB_UNATTENDED is mostly pointless. It just sets the
default value of debug.debugger_on_pa
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> >> > root@pele [9:29pm][/usr/temp] >>
> >> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
> >> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock
On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
>> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> > root@pele [9:29pm][/usr/temp] >>
>> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
>> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > root@pele [9:29pm][/usr/temp] >>
> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
> >> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order revers
On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > root@pele [9:29pm][/usr/temp] >>
>> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
>> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
>> > Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: 1st
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> On 30-Jul-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> However, those boxes were panicing ofte
On 31-Jul-01 Vincent Poy wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 30-Jul-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
>> >
>> >> However, those boxes were panicing often before I made that statement.
>> >> So I still believe cur
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:52:27 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> I'll be a lot happier when I can enabled DDB_UNATTENDED and do whatever
> it is that causes my panic of the day and actually get a crashdump
> instead of
>
> panic: witness_restore: lock (sleep mutex) Giant not locked
Right! We
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 30-Jul-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> >
> >> However, those boxes were panicing often before I made that statement.
> >> So I still believe current is now in better shape than it was in J
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:28:06AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Jul-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> > temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
> > hang for around 20-30 seconds, du
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:28:09 MST, John Baldwin wrote:
> > panic: witness_restore: lock (sleep mutex) Giant not locked
>
> This is a different one. Is this during the dump itself? That I can
> try to work on. (Basically, I need to make witness just stop doing
> all of its various check
On 30-Jul-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
> hang for around 20-30 seconds, during which time absolutely no
> network/IO/keyboard/mouse activity is accept
On 30-Jul-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
>
>> However, those boxes were panicing often before I made that statement.
>> So I still believe current is now in better shape than it was in June.
>
> I'll be a lot happier when I can enabled D
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:38:47 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> However, those boxes were panicing often before I made that statement.
> So I still believe current is now in better shape than it was in June.
I'll be a lot happier when I can enabled DDB_UNATTENDED and do whatever
it is that causes m
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 04:32:00PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > I am also experiencing total wedging on disk activity (vi foo, was one)
> > on a SCSI system since I updated late last week. My May 7th kernel was
> > rock solid.
>
> Was this before or after you posted publically that -CURRENT s
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:26:55 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> I am also experiencing total wedging on disk activity (vi foo, was one)
> on a SCSI system since I updated late last week. My May 7th kernel was
> rock solid.
Was this before or after you posted publically that -CURRENT seemed
stable
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:00:11PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
> hang for around 20-30 seconds, during which time absolutely no
> network/IO/keyboard/mouse act
This has happened on and off for various platforms since SMPNG.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
> hang for around 20-30 seconds, dur
Hi all,
For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
hang for around 20-30 seconds, during which time absolutely no
network/IO/keyboard/mouse activity is accepted. Usually, after 20-30
seconds the system wi
> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
> on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
>
> The kernel had DDB enabled. I was running X, but I didn't see any
> signs of the kernel attempting to
> On 2000-Mar-09 10:05:21 +1100, Peter Dufault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There's no difference between rtprio and P1003.1B scheduling other than
> >the name. rtprio is the same as P1003.1B "SCHED_RR".
>
> I wasn't aware of that.
>
> >I'd like to remove the rtprio call from ntpd. I think we
On 2000-Mar-09 10:05:21 +1100, Peter Dufault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's no difference between rtprio and P1003.1B scheduling other than
>the name. rtprio is the same as P1003.1B "SCHED_RR".
I wasn't aware of that.
>I'd like to remove the rtprio call from ntpd. I think we ought to do
>
> On 2000-Mar-07 06:29:17 +1100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
> >> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
> >> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
> >> on a Dual celeron
:On 2000-Mar-07 06:29:17 +1100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
:>> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
:>> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
:>> on a Dual celeron box
On 2000-Mar-07 06:29:17 +1100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
>> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
>> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
>> on a Dual celeron box (BP6)
It is rumoured that Vallo Kallaste had the courage to say:
> I had a lockup yesterday while stress-testing new SMP machine. Tyan
> motherboard with Intel GX chipset, 256MB of memory, one 20GB IBM UDMA66
> disk, but running at UDMA33. All power management disabled completely in
> the BIOS. I was do
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested in the fix, of course :-) But where to start looking? I've
> had three lockups so far (none before january 2000) but I didn't find
> anything that reliably triggered it.
I had a lockup yesterday wh
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:46:25PM -0600, Marius Strom wrote:
>Unfortunately, the discussions occurred while the mailing list archive was
>kaput (WD Drive on UDMA66? =]) so it's not archived where I can find it.
I think this is the thread you're looking for:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=9
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:59:21PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote:
> It is rumoured that Peter Jeremy had the courage to say:
> > Note that ntpd will use rtprio if the Posix P1003.1b extensions aren't
> > enabled in the kernel. (These were enabled by default in GENERIC on
> > i386 in mid-January). If y
It is rumoured that Peter Jeremy had the courage to say:
> Note that ntpd will use rtprio if the Posix P1003.1b extensions aren't
> enabled in the kernel. (These were enabled by default in GENERIC on
> i386 in mid-January). If you have the new ntpd (rather than xntpd)
> and are running a kernel
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes
:
>> How about these Peltier (sp ?) cooling devices I have heard about ?
>
>A Peltier cell is just a semiconductor heat pump. It effectively just
>reduces the junction-to-heatsink thermal resistance, allowing you (in
>theory) to use a less effi
On 2000-Mar-07 06:29:17 +1100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
>> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
>> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
>> on a Dual celeron box (BP6)
On 2000-Mar-06 21:39:11 +1100, Matthew Sean Thyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My computer had been stable all winter (with setiathome runnning full
>time) but suddenly come the Australian summer it started freezing.
And it's been the coldest summer for something like 5 years...
> How about these
> Interesting. I'll check my own archives of -current to see if I can find
> the discussion. I always thought that the "Lost Disk Contact" messages were
> due to the disk recalibrating itself after six days of continued use. After
> Soren increased the timeout from 5 to 10 seconds, I never saw the
It is rumoured that Marius Strom had the courage to say:
> Well, there was a discussion a few weeks back with Soren Schmidt and a few
> others. I believe the conclusion was made that this occurred with most WD
> drives (interesting about the WD == IBM part, I did notice he mentioned
> that in -cu
Dave,
Well, there was a discussion a few weeks back with Soren Schmidt and a few
others. I believe the conclusion was made that this occurred with most WD
drives (interesting about the WD == IBM part, I did notice he mentioned
that in -current a few weeks ago as well). I had a WD20 gig that woul
It is rumoured that Marius Strom had the courage to say:
> I'm willing to bet a nickel (perhaps more) you people are running non-IBM
> UDMA66 drives on that BP6. Seems that most UDMA66 drives are not actually
> UDMA66 compliant, and they only drives that have been reported successful
> on the BP
I'm willing to bet a nickel (perhaps more) you people are running non-IBM
UDMA66 drives on that BP6. Seems that most UDMA66 drives are not actually
UDMA66 compliant, and they only drives that have been reported successful
on the BP6 are IBM. Try taking your HD's off the UDMA66 controller and
pu
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote:
> > on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
>
> Finally. I've been complaining about this on several occasions. I'm also
> running UDMA66 and Dual Celeron BP6. No overclocking.
Can you people reproduce this on a kernel without
> The cooling theory sounds the most plausible so far. I'm not over clocking
> my CPUs (Celeron 366s) and have appropriate cooling installed. But the
> machine is kept in a small room, with a bunch of other machines and gets
> a bit warm at times.
I have seen a couple of suggestions that this may
It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
> The cooling theory sounds the most plausible so far. I'm not over clocking
> my CPUs (Celeron 366s) and have appropriate cooling installed. But the
> machine is kept in a small room, with a bunch of other machines and gets
> a bit warm at t
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote:
> > Has this been fixed ? Is anyone interested in investigating ?
> > I'll post more info if I find anything.
>
> I'm interested in the fix, of course :-) But where to start looking? I've
> had three lockups so far (none before january 2
It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say:
> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
> on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
Finally. I've been complaining about this on sever
I'll second this email...
My computer had been stable all winter (with setiathome runnning full
time) but suddenly come the Australian summer it started freezing.
Not panicing, just totally freezing under load.
I could reproduce it by trying to build the whole of KDE and each time
it was a free
1. Is your computer overclocked?
2. Is the computer totally frozen? (i.e. scroll lock doesn't turn the light on)
3. Does similar load crash the box as well? (try make -j2 world)
4. Does it freeze in the same spot?
5. Is the computer not responding to pings?
If you've answered yes to a good
Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
The kernel had DDB enabled. I was running X, but I didn't see any
signs of the kernel attempting to get into the
51 matches
Mail list logo
