Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-27 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Wed, 27-Mar-2002 at 22:59:21 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > andre.albsmeier> One thing I don't understand here (for the case someone > andre.albsmeier> sets ${sendmail_enable} to NO): > > andre.albsmeier> Both, ${sendmail_outbound_enable} and > andre.albsmeier> ${sendmail_submit_enable}

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-27 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
andre.albsmeier> One thing I don't understand here (for the case someone andre.albsmeier> sets ${sendmail_enable} to NO): andre.albsmeier> Both, ${sendmail_outbound_enable} and andre.albsmeier> ${sendmail_submit_enable} are on by andre.albsmeier> default. ${sendmail_outbound_flags} ist set to: a

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-27 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Mon, 25-Mar-2002 at 23:58:23 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > An issue came up on freebsd-stable today regarding the boot-time startup of > sendmail for users who are using other MTAs. The end result was that users > needed a way to completely prevent sendmail from trying to start at boot

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread ian j hart
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > > keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in > keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. > keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should > keramida> remember to update etc/mail/Makefile to

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-26 15:02, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > keramida> Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in > keramida> /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says > keramida> "If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please > keramida> update *t

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
keramida> Aye. Until there is a more NetBSD'ish way of calling sendmail in keramida> /etc, we can probably get away with a note in /etc/rc that says keramida> "If you make changes related to Sendmail in this file, please keramida> update *that* file too." Can we put something like this in kerami

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-26 12:51, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in > keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. > keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should > keramida> remember to update et

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
keramida> I am not sure if duplicating the code of etc/rc in keramida> etc/mail/Makefile is something I am really happy about though. keramida> This means that anyone who wants to make changes to etc/rc should keramida> remember to update etc/mail/Makefile too. Yes, I really hope the /etc/rc.d wo

Re: For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-26 Thread keramida
On 2002-03-25 23:58, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > > FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-STABLE > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT: http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/smstart-CURRENT I don't have STABLE around, so I've only looked at smstart-CURRENT. It's nice, if you ask me.

For review: Revised sendmail startup settings

2002-03-25 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
An issue came up on freebsd-stable today regarding the boot-time startup of sendmail for users who are using other MTAs. The end result was that users needed a way to completely prevent sendmail from trying to start at boot time. The current order of operations at boot time is: # MTA if ${sendm