On 2016-02-11 20:50, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet captures?
(Firewall, FreeBSD, Windows)? I
On 2016-02-12 08:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-12 08:02, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 12 Feb 2016, at 10:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 20:50, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 11 Feb
> On 12 Feb 2016, at 10:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-11 20:50, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> From which
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:50:59PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> > On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:56:08AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-02-12 07:45, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:50:59PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >
> >> On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
> >> >
> On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-12 08:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>> sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0
>> makes it work
> Shouldn't the stack do the right thing here? For the record, the other side
> is also FreeBSD (10.2-STABLE).
>
Yes, but
On 2016-02-12 07:45, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:50:59PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> From which system(s)
On 2016-02-12 08:02, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 12 Feb 2016, at 10:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 20:50, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman
On 2016-02-12 08:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-12 08:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0
makes it work
Shouldn't the stack do the right thing here? For the record, the
other side
is also FreeBSD
> On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:33, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-12 08:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On 2016-02-12 08:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0
makes it work
>>>
On 2016-02-12 14:07, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:33, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-12 08:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 12 Feb 2016, at 15:29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-02-12 08:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0
On 2016-02-11 04:14, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 2016-02-10 20:38:02 (-0600), Larry Rosenman wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206904
I've also posted lots of info to freebsd-net, and not gotten any
response.
Summary:
Cable Modem-> EM0 on a pfSense
> On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet captures?
> (Firewall, FreeBSD, Windows)?
I wouldn’t expect it to make much of a difference in this case.
Let’s start with whatever is easiest.
Regards,
Kristof
On 2016-02-10 20:38:02 (-0600), Larry Rosenman wrote:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206904
>
> I've also posted lots of info to freebsd-net, and not gotten any
> response.
>
> Summary:
>
> Cable Modem-> EM0 on a pfSense Firewall (FreeBSD 10.1, pfSense
On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
>> On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet captures?
>> (Firewall, FreeBSD, Windows)?
> I wouldn't expect it to make much of a difference in this case.
> Let's start
On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet captures?
> (Firewall, FreeBSD, Windows)? I wouldn't expect it to make much
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206904
I've also posted lots of info to freebsd-net, and not gotten any
response.
Summary:
Cable Modem-> EM0 on a pfSense Firewall (FreeBSD 10.1, pfSense 2.2.6)
set to dhcp6, and ask for a /56 prefix
EM1->LAN, set to track
17 matches
Mail list logo