I don't know, in some ways it might be more interesting to make something
just for a virtualized device, however reality is that I have way too many
higher priority items to worry about after the new year gets underway than
that, even so, we can see...
Jack
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Luigi
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> LOL, it's ironic, my intention in creating lem was to isolate the old
> pre-PCIE driver from active changes so as to assure it's stability...
> but virtualization comes around to bit me in the butt :)
>
> I guess I'm agreeable in principle wit
LOL, it's ironic, my intention in creating lem was to isolate the old
pre-PCIE driver from active changes so as to assure it's stability...
but virtualization comes around to bit me in the butt :)
I guess I'm agreeable in principle with what you're doing Luigi, but
can you do me a favor and hold o
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 02:26:44AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > This patch implements two features for the 'lem' driver that
> > greatly improve the throughput under proper hypervisor.
> > This is joint work with Vincenzo Maffione and Giuse
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> This patch implements two features for the 'lem' driver that
> greatly improve the throughput under proper hypervisor.
> This is joint work with Vincenzo Maffione and Giuseppe Lettieri,
> I am posting it here for review, will then commit it
> i
