Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:32:15PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:47:15PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Are these suitable for importing as a regression suite? > > > > We could just import the GCC testsuite... it would ad

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-11 Thread Mike Barcroft
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:38:58PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > Could you please try to compile libmsun with with GCC 3.3 snapshot David > > just committed and see if that changes anything? > > It doesn't compile on -current. Mike and the standar

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:32:15PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:47:15PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Are these suitable for importing as a regression suite? > > We could just import the GCC testsuite... it would add 25 MB (checked > out, more w/in /home/ncvs/src :-(

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:47:15PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Are these suitable for importing as a regression suite? We could just import the GCC testsuite... it would add 25 MB (checked out, more w/in /home/ncvs/src :-( ) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe free

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 10 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > >> > >> This is a terrible example in that its impossible to tell what > >> happened, but it sure shows that something is wrong. > >>

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:29:33PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:26:47AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > Is there a floating point regression suite that you can point me at? > > > That would be more useful for debugging. > > > > I forgot another test suite. See >

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: >> >> This is a terrible example in that its impossible to tell what >> happened, but it sure shows that something is wrong. >> >> Is there a floating point regression suite that you can point me at?

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:38:58PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > Could you please try to compile libmsun with with GCC 3.3 snapshot David > just committed and see if that changes anything? It doesn't compile on -current. Mike and the standards guys are suspose to undo the breakage that crept

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:26:47 +0200 (CEST) Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Looks like we win some and we loose some. I just noticed something > > weird on my P4 desktop using: > > I reported it too soon. I forgot that on remote Desktops the problem > doesn't happen > :P

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:26:47AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > Is there a floating point regression suite that you can point me at? > > That would be more useful for debugging. > I forgot another test suite. See http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jhauser/arithmetic/TestFloat.html -- Steve To

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > Looks like we win some and we loose some. I just noticed something > weird on my P4 desktop using: I reported it too soon. I forgot that on remote Desktops the problem doesn't happen :P So OpenOffice is still broken. Yes, now mpg123 plays sound, but the output is horribly noisy. I'm at

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > This is a terrible example in that its impossible to tell what > happened, but it sure shows that something is wrong. > > Is there a floating point regression suite that you can point me at? > That would be more useful for debu

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Martin Blapp writes: > > > There might still be a problem with libm and -march=pentium4. I do not > > have P4 myself and I cannot reproduce the problem locally. > > This problem is also solved. libm compiles again fine with -march=pentium4. > OpenOffice and xmms, mpg123 work as they did b

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-10 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Alexander, > I am going to import a new GCC 3.2.1 snapshot in about 10 minutes. > This update fixes the problem with cpp0 dumping core while building a > kernels many people reported on the list. Yes, this is fixed. Just tested it with my config :P > There might still be a problem with libm

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-09 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:13:04 -0400 Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am going to import a new GCC 3.2.1 snapshot in about 10 minutes. > This update fixes the problem with cpp0 dumping core while building a > kernels many people reported on the list. > > Due to popular demand, it w

Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming

2002-10-09 Thread Robert Watson
Wonderful. Your work on the toolchain is much appreciated! Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > I am going to import a new GCC 3.2.1 snapshot in about 10 minute