On 06/26/11 15:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-06-25 17:53, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other
binutils
from LL
On 06/26/11 15:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-06-25 17:53, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other
binutils
from LLVM and was wondering w
On 2011-06-25 17:53, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
col
On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
collection but not in FreeBSD's source contri
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Hello.
> Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
> from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
> collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution.
There's no use for thes
