Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-29 Thread Robert L Sowders
Brian T.Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/2002 05:07 AM To: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: The sendmail discussion... |On Thursday

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Robert L Sowders
Greg is absolutely correct. These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any, should contribute the code if they want it changed. Also I shudder to think that those who customize their systems would actually learn how to use all the tools available to them to prevent

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Robert L Sowders([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.28 03:39:51 +: Greg is absolutely correct. yes, i agree These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any, should contribute the code if they want it changed. being a terrible c-coder i have to admit that, after having

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Brian T . Schellenberger
On Thursday 28 March 2002 06:39 am, Robert L Sowders wrote: | Greg is absolutely correct. | | These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any, | should contribute the code if they want it changed. | | Also I shudder to think that those who customize their systems would |

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : 1. Convert FreeBSD into a bunch of packages and let binary installations :with sysinstall (or some future installer) pick and chose or pick :from a short list of standard systems. Offer

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:01:31 -0800 From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Whelan wrote: (my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Nate Williams
(my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the law. Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a statement with the above stipulation. In order to avoid this, I

California Labor Law (was Re: The sendmail discussion...)

2002-03-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Kevin Oberman wrote: From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Whelan wrote: (my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the law. Minor correction: You need to move

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Matthew Whelan
28/03/2002 11:39:51, Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any, should contribute the code if they want it changed. Hmph. Inability to contribute - whether it be lack of necessary coding knowledge, time constraints or

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew Whelan wrote: (my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the law. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-03-28 13:34, Nate Williams wrote: (my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the law. Every California company I've worked for has made me ... ...which was signed

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Patrick
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Nate Williams wrote: (my company demands that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by them) You need to move to California, where this is against the law. Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a statement with

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Sam
Folks, I hate to be snotty, but gosh, I don't think this thread really belongs in a discussion about -stable. Bad enough that the sendmail created so many me too's but wouldn't -chat be a better place for california laws? Sam -- Just because you're moving fast | BURMA SHAVE

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-27 Thread Manfred Antar
At 10:25 PM 3/27/2002 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: I've been purposefully trying to avoid getting involved with the entire should sendmail be in the base OS debate as my input would obviously be biased. However, avoiding a response has become more and more difficult as I've seen unanswered