Julian Elischer wrote:
If it is to be counted as my only achivement on -core that I timed
out SLICE and DEVFS, I'll still be proud of what I did there.
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for
was the CAM
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA wraps incorrectly.
On Friday, 17 August 2001 at 9:16:59 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian
Elischer writes:
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for
was the CAM
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because
On Thursday, 16 August 2001 at 6:36:45 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
the lack of subdirectory support is a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
ls -la /dev/fd
What am I supposed to see there? I get three character devices, all
mounted on /dev directly.
Uhm, have you forgotten how ls(1) works ?
No.
Try this then:
ls -lad /dev/fd /dev/fd/[012]
Hmm. Strange. Last time
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 16 August 2001 at 6:36:45 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
In view of the fact that this thread is about deficiencies in your
devfs, this is particularly uncalled for. One of the reasons
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
After 3 years I gave up on the hope that it would ever be fixed
well enough to become politically acceptable.
After 6 years I removed it.
A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
julian phk other
199556 3 15
199620
[cc's trimmed]
John,
Thanks for the suggestion, I appreciate it. I did as you suggested
(diff below).
It paniced again, but this time savecore said dump time is unreasonable.
The short panic message was:
panicstr: bremfree: bp 0xcc2a1ae4 not locked
Looks like the same thing to me, sorry.
On 16-Aug-01 Michael Lucas wrote:
[cc's trimmed]
John,
Thanks for the suggestion, I appreciate it. I did as you suggested
(diff below).
It paniced again, but this time savecore said dump time is unreasonable.
The short panic message was:
panicstr: bremfree: bp 0xcc2a1ae4 not
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
julian phk other
199556
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
julian phk other
199556
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Julian feels he has no avenue of recourse and gives up..--
if (!strcmp(DEVFS, SLICE))
return (ECONFUSED);
Julian, you had four years, during which you didn't even manage to
make half of the commits made to the DEVFS code
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
| writes:
| +---[ Greg Lehey ]--
| |
|
| [snip]
|
| | whether it's been fixed. Basically, devfs as supplied in CURRENT had
| | a 16 character limit on device
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
writes:
The problem turns up most violently within the XFree86 DRI Module, since
it now uses make_dev, and not mknod as it used to.
The DRI Module first attempts to mkdir /dev/dri/, and then for each card
it supports attempts to use
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
| writes:
|
| The problem turns up most violently within the XFree86 DRI Module, since
| it now uses make_dev, and not mknod as it used to.
|
| The DRI Module first attempts to mkdir
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
writes:
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
| writes:
|
| The problem turns up most violently within the XFree86 DRI Module, since
| it now uses make_dev, and not mknod as
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:21:39AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 August 2001 at 19:26:09 -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
Before I start generating crash dumps etc., are there any gotchas
with Vinum -current? I'm using devfs on a SMP system, upgraded 3
days ago. I get a panic
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
| writes:
| +---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| | In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
| | writes:
| |
| | The problem turns up most violently within the
the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
it was a primary design goal in the previous devfs and its
disappearance caught me by surprise. (the support I mean)
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
There is support for subdirectories:
ls -la /dev/fd
it was a primary design goal in the previous devfs and its
disappearance caught me by surprise. (the support I mean)
SATIRE
The
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:21:39AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
To help localize this problem, could you please try this same thing on
a kernel without devfs? The dump you sent me did not look like a
Vinum bug, as I said in my reply.
Sorry, it happens on a non-devfs kernel as well. Since it
On 15-Aug-01 Michael Lucas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:21:39AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
To help localize this problem, could you please try this same thing on
a kernel without devfs? The dump you sent me did not look like a
Vinum bug, as I said in my reply.
Sorry, it happens on a
On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
There is support for subdirectories:
ls -la /dev/fd
What am I supposed to see there? I get three character
[snip]
And in general, can we stop the high incidence of mud-slinging we've
seen on the lists lately?
Here, here!
Brandon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
There is support for subdirectories:
ls -la /dev/fd
What am I
On Tuesday, 14 August 2001 at 19:26:09 -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
Before I start generating crash dumps etc., are there any gotchas
with Vinum -current? I'm using devfs on a SMP system, upgraded 3
days ago. I get a panic whenever I stripe something.
Ah, now you say devfs. There was a
+---[ Greg Lehey ]--
|
[snip]
| whether it's been fixed. Basically, devfs as supplied in CURRENT had
| a 16 character limit on device names, and it didn't understand
| subdirectories: it treated the / as a part of the device name.
The subdir part bit me about a week
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
writes:
+---[ Greg Lehey ]--
|
[snip]
| whether it's been fixed. Basically, devfs as supplied in CURRENT had
| a 16 character limit on device names, and it didn't understand
| subdirectories: it treated the / as a
On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 7:16:02 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kenneth Milton
writes:
+---[ Greg Lehey ]--
[snip]
whether it's been fixed. Basically, devfs as supplied in CURRENT had
a 16 character limit on device
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
I'm working on the 16char limit problem as well, but I want to avoid
allocating memory in incovenient circumstances if at all possible.
The problem is that I kept having problems with the devfs/vinum
combination even after increasing the size
34 matches
Mail list logo
