On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
> I'm not at all satisfied with the way password arguments to spppcontrol
> work currently.
How about some /etc/sppp/{pap,chap}-secrets with restrictive permissions?
So you could specify everything except the secrets with spppcon
>From the keyboard of Alexander Leidinger:
> >> But with i4b you have to specify a username-password pair in rc.conf
> >> (spppconfig_isp0) and I didn_t want to show it to every user (rc.conf
> >> is u+rw,g+r,o+r for reasons you mention).
> >
> > What about /etc/start_if.isp0?
>
> Yes, with per
Also sprach Alexander Leidinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > What about /etc/start_if.isp0?
> Yes, with permissions of u+r,go-rwx it´s more secure than the currently
> recommended way.
> Hellmuth? Will this be the new official way of configuring i4b?
A second advantage: You can sh /etc/start_if.isp0
On 11 Nov, Harold Gutch wrote:
>> > Using command substitution in /etc/rc.conf{,.local} is NOT
>> > officially supported. I think it should have always been
>> > clear that there should _only_ be plain variable assignments.
>>
>> But with i4b you have to specify a username-password pair in rc.co
