On Fri, 25 May 2001, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:04:09PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> > There is no any technical problems in doing that. But I'm unsure
> > if this should be done (code is not very small). On other hand, people
> > expect it in the base system... Probably
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >
> > > I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's
> > > umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed
> > > interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuar
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> > I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's
> > umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed
> > interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuarly good,
> > either. Look at the -hackers and cvs-all a
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:44:37PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > > I still don't see why an rc.conf knob specifically for /tmp isn't
> > > sufficient. That's what people want this for.
My take on it is that having a script that you can feed parameters and have
it create a nice memory disk for you would be a cool thing, and since you'd
have to put effectively the same commands into rc (or wherever) the "bloat"
would be minimal. So, if someone wants to send me the stuff, either th
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >
> > > Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
> >
> > The objection that impressed me t
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> > Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
>
> The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is that
> it's totally
On 25 May, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
>> Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
>
> The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is
> that it's totally counter-intuitive to have a
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is that
it's totally counter-intuitive to have a binary called mount_mfs that
doesn't mount an MFS
> I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's
> umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed
> interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuarly good,
> either. Look at the -hackers and cvs-all archives around late January
> and
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:36:42PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn posted a patch to add such a knob around January when we
> were having this exact discussion. Personally, I think it only solves
> half a problem; what if you want /tmp and /tmp2? And why should it be
> limited to boo
On 24 Mai, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> BTW, what happened to mount_mfs in current? It still gives this nasty
>> warning about migrating to mdconfig, waits 15 seconds and then panics
>> my machine.
>
> Mine too. It also appears there's no canonical (i.e. rc.conf) knob
MSG-IDs:
- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 24 May 2001 19:56:33 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Mine too. It also appears there's no canonical (i.e. rc.conf) knob
> for configuring /tmp as a MD (there are however instructions in the
> manpage which I hacked in manually on my system)
I sent patches for this when the whole MD thing
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:12:14PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:13:21PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> >> >> Should there be
On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:13:21PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>> >> Should there be a mount_smbfs to go with this? How does one mount smb
>> >> shares otherwi
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:13:21PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> >> Should there be a mount_smbfs to go with this? How does one mount smb
> >> shares otherwise?
> >
> > It's in the smbfs port.
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
