Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-11-07 Thread Mike Smith
> > > "We do not support upgrading to -current from anything else than the > > > latest -stable." > > > > Does this still hold after the recent signal changes ? > > > > TfH > > > > (I assume Yes, if one first upgrade the kernel, then the world) > > You assume correctly. -stable loader

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > > Mike once said (and, ergo, can be found on the mailing list > > archives): > > > > "We do not support upgrading to -current from anything else than the > > latest -stable." > > Does this still hold after the recent signal changes ? > > TfH > > (I assume Ye

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Lauri Laupmaa wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > > The flag is probably -fformat-extensions so eliminate it from > > /usr/share/mk/bsd.kern.mk. > > Then build linker/kernel/world. > > Thank you all who replied! The trick was to take new loader from running > system,

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-11-07 Thread Thierry Herbelot
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > Taavi Talvik wrote: > > > > Only alternative to get these from outside is to upgrade graduall.. but > > who knows which intermediate source repository dates are good for it? > > Mike once said (and, ergo, can be found on the mailing list > archives): > > "We do not

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Taavi Talvik wrote: > > Only alternative to get these from outside is to upgrade graduall.. but > who knows which intermediate source repository dates are good for it? Mike once said (and, ergo, can be found on the mailing list archives): "We do not support upgrading to -current from anything e

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-01-04 Thread Lauri Laupmaa
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > The flag is probably -fformat-extensions so eliminate it from > /usr/share/mk/bsd.kern.mk. > Then build linker/kernel/world. Thank you all who replied! The trick was to take new loader from running system, because it was impossible to build one

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-01-03 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Lauri Laupmaa wrote: ... > I have -CURRENT from 16 nov 1998 and stuck badly... > If I make new kernel, loader says its format's unknown, if I try to make > new loader, it says some gcc flag is unknown, if I try to make new gcc it The flag is probably -fformat-extensions so

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-01-03 Thread Taavi Talvik
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > > I have -CURRENT from 16 nov 1998 and stuck badly... ... >Read all of the -current mailing list starting in 17 November > 1998 all the way up to today, and then read /usr/src/UPDATING. No, it does not work. Currently it is impossible to upgrade fr

Re: stuck with ~year old current

1999-01-03 Thread Chris Costello
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999, Lauri Laupmaa wrote: > Hi > > I have -CURRENT from 16 nov 1998 and stuck badly... > If I make new kernel, loader says its format's unknown, if I try to make > new loader, it says some gcc flag is unknown, if I try to make new gcc it > barfs also... > > >From where should I

stuck with ~year old current

1999-01-03 Thread Lauri Laupmaa
Hi I have -CURRENT from 16 nov 1998 and stuck badly... If I make new kernel, loader says its format's unknown, if I try to make new loader, it says some gcc flag is unknown, if I try to make new gcc it barfs also... >From where should I start ? TIA _ Lauri To Unsubscribe: send mail to [