Re: src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

2003-07-15 Thread Jun Kuriyama
exp.c: In function `main': exp.c:4: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a global declaration built-in:0: warning: shadowed declaration is here -- Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] // IMG SRC, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] // FreeBSD Project ___ [EMAIL

src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

2003-07-14 Thread Jun Kuriyama
With new gcc and -Wshadow, src/bin/ed/re.c shows this warning: cc -Wshadow -c re.c re.c: In function `get_compiled_pattern': re.c:44: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a global declaration built-in:0: warning: shadowed declaration is here It seems local variable exp is conflicted with exp(3

Re: src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

2003-07-14 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: JK JKWith new gcc and -Wshadow, src/bin/ed/re.c shows this warning: JK JKcc -Wshadow -c re.c JKre.c: In function `get_compiled_pattern': JKre.c:44: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a global declaration JKbuilt-in:0: warning: shadowed declaration

WARNING: ttyname(3)/sshd breakage fixed.

2003-06-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
If you reinstalled libc with the previous version of ttyname.c your sshd will likely get confused and refuse access. Apologies... Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp writes: phk 2003/06/21 01:16:12 PDT FreeBSD src repository Modified files:

Gdk-Warning

2003-06-17 Thread Blaise Takoudjou
Hello, how can i resolv this warning ? Gdk-WARNING **: Missing charsets in FontSet creation i have starting and reciving message with gaim thanks ! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: Gdk-Warning

2003-06-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:48, Blaise Takoudjou wrote: Hello, how can i resolv this warning ? Gdk-WARNING **: Missing charsets in FontSet creation i have starting and reciving message with gaim This really isn't appropriate to the current@ mailing list. However, this might be fixed

if_dc warning messages

2003-03-13 Thread Ilmar S. Habibulin
I've cvsuped to -current from 11-12 march and afer booting new kernel got repeated messages from kernel to syslog and console. Mar 13 13:50:38 ws-ilmar kernel: malloc() of 128 with the following non-sleepablelocks held: Mar 13 13:50:38 ws-ilmar kernel: exclusive sleep mutex dc0 (network driver)

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Garrett Wollman wrote: `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and `#endif' can be recognized). I thought that the other discussion had concluded that: #if 0 ... #else Or:

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Craig Rodrigues wrote: In sys/syslimits.h, I see: #if __GNUC__ #warning No user-serviceable parts inside. #endif Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? Yes. It is a preprocessor directive specific the GCC preprocessor. This was discussed

Warning: driver mistake

2003-03-09 Thread walt
Starting today I noticed this warning at bootup: WARNING: Driver mistake: make_dev(console) called before SI_SUB_DRIVERS Is there more info I should supply? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Warning: driver mistake

2003-03-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes: Starting today I noticed this warning at bootup: WARNING: Driver mistake: make_dev(console) called before SI_SUB_DRIVERS Is there more info I should supply? Ooops. No, that is plenty. I'll fix it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus

Re: Warning: driver mistake

2003-03-09 Thread walt
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes: Starting today I noticed this warning at bootup: WARNING: Driver mistake: make_dev(console) called before SI_SUB_DRIVERS Is there more info I should supply? Ooops. No, that is plenty. I'll fix it. Yes, fixed now. Thanks

#warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:19:43 -0500, Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive instead. I asked portmgr to do a run on the portsd cluster

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 08), Garrett Wollman said: On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:19:43 -0500, Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive instead. I

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
upon it anyway? One can even claim that emitting an error or warning *is* reaction upon the directive. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
preprocessors should interpret directives when they are dead (ie part of an #if block or #else block that is not to be compiled). I tried to use this once, on a cross-platform program I wrote. I can tell you that some compilers will choke on a #warning, even if it is inside a #if/#endif. And other

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them. Er, I should note that I do like the idea

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Maxime Henrion
Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them. Er, I

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:19:43AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, In sys/syslimits.h, I see: #if __GNUC__ #warning No user-serviceable parts inside. #endif Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working on something similar

#warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, In sys/syslimits.h, I see: #if __GNUC__ #warning No user-serviceable parts inside. #endif Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working on something similar for machine/limits.h. Some other header files check for __GNUC__ before using

CPUTYPE=p4 warning needed

2002-12-14 Thread Jon Noack
it would be a good idea to include a warning in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf that says CPUTYPE optimizations may result in broken code. Maybe it's just my machine, but I've recompiled several times now and it's consistent (if and only if I build and install world with CPUTYPE=p4 is the problem

Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Vallo Kallaste
Hi Just did the following: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1k count=512 #remove old stuff fdisk -I da1#cover the entire disk with one da1s1 slice fdisk da1 #check what's put there disklabel -rw da1s1 auto#install virgin disklabel disklabel -e da1s1 #add partition e:,

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote: Hi Just did the following: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1k count=512 #remove old stuff fdisk -I da1#cover the entire disk with one da1s1 slice fdisk da1 #check what's put there disklabel -rw da1s1 auto#install virgin

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Vallo Kallaste
heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=554 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Julian Elischer
fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 8899947 63unused0 0 # (Cyl.0*- 553*) e: 8899947 634.2BSD0 0 0 # (Cyl.0*- 553*) partition c: partition extends past end of unit Warning, partition c doesn't start at 0! Warning

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] In pre-geom days we had a realhack (TM) that would fiddle the label if you read it direct from the disk. In other words it fixed it to always look (u relative I think) even if you read it from

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] In pre-geom days we had a realhack (TM) that would fiddle the label if you read it direct from the disk. In other words it fixed it to always look

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : partition c: partition extends past end of unit : Warning, partition c doesn't start at 0! : Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities : partition e: partition extends past

Re: WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding

2002-10-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Juli Mallett wrote: find_dependcyType: application/x-java-applet [ ... ] It's a bourne shell script, terry, try looking at it. Then the MIME type is wrong. Certainly, the disposition inline is wrong. I've been bombarded with all sorts of crap like this lately which were DDOS client

Re: WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding

2002-10-17 Thread Andrew Turner
Try this then: #!/bin/sh #Default options LINTCONF=LINT.CONF LINTCONF1=LINT.CONF1 ARCH=`uname -m` ARCH1=$ARCH SRCDIR=/sys START=0 END=0 NOCLEAN=0 TMPDIR=/tmp/makedepend WD=`pwd` #Read the command line while [ $# -ne 0 ] do case $1 in --src-dir)

WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding

2002-10-16 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrew Turner wrote: Name: find_dependcy find_dependcyType: application/x-java-applet Encoding: base64 This posting is a Java applet with inline disposition. Do not

Re: WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding

2002-10-16 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-16 ] [ Subjecte: WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding ] Andrew Turner wrote: Name: find_dependcy find_dependcy

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-13 Thread Bruce Evans
/dev/ccd/ccd.c:1181: warning: long long int format, daddr_t arg (arg 6) *** Error code 1 This is a routine printf format error. %lld format should only be used for printing long longs (which should never be used). Here the type is daddr_t, which happens to be int64_t, which happens to be plain

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-13 Thread Maxime Henrion
Bruce Evans wrote: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /local0/src2/sys/dev/ccd/ccd.c: In function `ccdiodone': /local0/src2/sys/dev/ccd/ccd.c:1181: warning: long long int format, daddr_t arg (arg 6) *** Error code 1 This is a routine printf format error. %lld format should only

Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
How are you supposed to disable -Werror in kernel builds? Setting NO_WERROR in the env or passing it to 'make buildkernel' via -D doesn't work; neither does putting -Wno-error in COPTFLAGS. I get the following fatal warning when compiling a recent alpha 5.0 kernel under 4.x: cc -c -O -pipe

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: How are you supposed to disable -Werror in kernel builds? Setting NO_WERROR in the env or passing it to 'make buildkernel' via -D doesn't work; neither does putting -Wno-error in COPTFLAGS. I get the following fatal warning when compiling a recent

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:52:40PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: NO_WERROR was removed so the only way is to set in your make.conf: WERROR= This causes the WERROR?=-Werror to not set the flag. Thanks, Bill Fenner also told me this on IRC. The directions in /usr/src/UPDATING need to be fixed

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:52:40PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: (who wants NO_WERROR back or better, warns-clean code more often in -current) NO_WERROR is standard in userland; it should work in the kernel too. Peter removed support for this a while

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:27:50PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: How are you supposed to disable -Werror in kernel builds? Setting NO_WERROR in the env or passing it to 'make buildkernel' via -D doesn't work; neither does putting -Wno-error in COPTFLAGS. I get the following fatal warning when

Re: Alpha fatal warning in kernel compile

2002-09-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
putting -Wno-error in COPTFLAGS. I get the following fatal warning when compiling a recent alpha 5.0 kernel under 4.x: Exactly how were you compiling this? `make buildworld kernel'? Or just straight compile of the kernel? If the latter I would expect that not to work too much longer as we

make warning at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk

2002-08-12 Thread Maxim M. Kazachek
make warning /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 2580: warning: duplicate script for target patch-message ignored breaks portupgrade of several ports portupgrade says that Makefile broken on these ports (I'm not subscribed to freebsd-ports so reply direct, please) Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek

Re: Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-09 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote: Hi Ruslan, During make release I see a lot of these messages: # make: no target to make. /usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140: warning: make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE returned non-zero

Re: Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-09 Thread John Hay
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote: Hi Ruslan, During make release I see a lot of these messages: # make: no target to make. /usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140: warning: make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE returned

w/uptime warning inappropriately under xdm/kdm [patch]...

2002-08-09 Thread Sean Chittenden
I've switched one of my desktops to using kdm and I've noticed that w(1) creates suprious warnings because it can't find the tty entry. $ w w: /dev/:0: No such file or directory w: /dev/:0: No such file or directory 2:41AM up 49 mins, 0 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.04, 0.04 USER

Makefile.inc1 warning

2002-08-08 Thread John Hay
Hi Ruslan, During make release I see a lot of these messages: # make: no target to make. /usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140: warning: make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE returned non-zero status make: no target to make. /usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140

pax fix (was Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneouslycreate world writeable dirs)

2002-06-11 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
On Jun 7, 2002 01:27:31 pm +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:15:09AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: Dan Nelson wrote: [snip] According to Mr. Schilling's testing, GNU tar 1.13.25 has a bug: ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/star/testscripts/README.gtarfail . I guess

Re: pax fix (was Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs)

2002-06-11 Thread Bjoern Fischer
PS : I've finished to merge diffs from OpenBSD last week, but diffs w/ NetBSD are really big... so, be patient :P What about bin/35886? Björn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: pax fix (was Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs)

2002-06-11 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:07:45AM +0200, Bjoern Fischer wrote: PS : I've finished to merge diffs from OpenBSD last week, but diffs w/ NetBSD are really big... so, be patient :P What about bin/35886? already done using the NetBSD way. the problem is that they use LC_TIME (hugh!) to pass

Re: pax fix (was Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs)

2002-06-11 Thread Bjoern Fischer
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:27:19AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: [...] already done using the NetBSD way. the problem is that they use LC_TIME (hugh!) to pass the format string to strftime while LC_TIME isn't suppose to contain any format strings but a locale name. Ew! That won't work for my

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:15:09AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: On my friend's BSD/OS system, there is no tar--or rather, it's just a hard link to pax: % ls -li `which tar` `which pax` 1819 -r-xr-xr-x 2 bin bin 58288 Jun 12 1998 /bin/pax 1819 -r-xr-xr-x 2 bin bin

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-07 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:15:09AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: Dan Nelson wrote: [snip] According to Mr. Schilling's testing, GNU tar 1.13.25 has a bug: ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/star/testscripts/README.gtarfail . I guess it qualifies as a non-trivial program. :-) FYI, the current pax

WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've just noticed that something wrong with the new tar in the base system (1.13.25) - when extracting some archives it creates 777 dirs, while permissions in the archive itself are OK (for example GNU make make-3.79.1.tar.gz - top level dir gets 777 as well as several other lowel level

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've just noticed that something wrong with the new tar in the base system (1.13.25) - when extracting some archives it creates 777 dirs, while permissions in the archive itself are OK (for example GNU make make-3.79.1.tar.gz - top level dir gets 777 as well as several other lowel

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create worldwriteable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Trevor Johnson
I've just noticed that something wrong with the new tar in the base system (1.13.25) - when extracting some archives it creates 777 dirs, while permissions in the archive itself are OK (for example GNU make make-3.79.1.tar.gz - top level dir gets 777 as well as several other lowel level

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 06), Trevor Johnson said: I've just noticed that something wrong with the new tar in the base system (1.13.25) - when extracting some archives it creates 777 dirs, while permissions in the archive itself are OK (for example GNU make make-3.79.1.tar.gz - top level

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Dan Nelson wrote: Tar 1.13 is 3 years old, and has many bugs (incremental backups are unusable, for example). On the flip side, I hear it respects the umask when running as root... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create world writeable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've just noticed that something wrong with the new tar in the base system (1.13.25) - when extracting some archives it creates 777 dirs, while permissions in the archive itself are OK (for example GNU make make-3.79.1.tar.gz - top level dir gets 777 as well as several

Re: WARNING! New GNU Tar in 5-CURRENT could erroneously create worldwriteable dirs

2002-06-06 Thread Trevor Johnson
Dan Nelson wrote: The latest version on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/tar/ is 1.13. The ones on ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/tar/ (and everything else on that site) are considered unstable. I suppose it's too late to suggest tar 1.13 as a starting point, but maybe this could be kept in mind when

Lilian Anti-Virus System Warning - Virus Found

2002-05-07 Thread postmaster
The following message had attachment(s) which contained the viruses: From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject : ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù Date : Message-ID: AttachmentVirus name Action taken

cc1 warning as errors - can one switch this off?

2002-03-19 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I cvsuped again. Got the vm_map.c now compiled but now kernel compilation stops somehwere in ipv6 files. Can one switch off compiler pickyness? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: cc1 warning as errors - can one switch this off?

2002-03-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:11:05PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I cvsuped again. Got the vm_map.c now compiled but now kernel compilation stops somehwere in ipv6 files. Can one switch off compiler pickyness? From /usr/src/UPDATING: 20020225: Warnings are now errors in the

Re: cc1 warning as errors - can one switch this off?

2002-03-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:11:05PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I cvsuped again. Got the vm_map.c now compiled but now kernel compilation stops somehwere in ipv6 files. Can one switch off compiler pickyness? Go back and read what config(8) is telling you, it's right there in front of

Re: cc1 warning as errors - can one switch this off?

2002-03-19 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:16:05 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: Go back and read what config(8) is telling you, it's right there in front of you! You shouldn't be too hard on people about missing config(8)'s output, given that it's buried if you use the buildkernel target, as recommended. Ciao,

Re: cc1 warning as errors - can one switch this off?

2002-03-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:36:15PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:16:05 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: Go back and read what config(8) is telling you, it's right there in front of you! You shouldn't be too hard on people about missing config(8)'s output, given that

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 17-Mar-2002 Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend when I ^C'ed a buildworld earlier, with same kernel. May be it should go to Alfred Perlstein? lock

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020318 10:24] wrote: On 17-Mar-2002 Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend when I ^C'ed a buildworld earlier, with

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Mar-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote: * John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020318 10:24] wrote: On 17-Mar-2002 Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend when I ^C'ed a buildworld earlier, with same kernel. May be it should go to Alfred Perlstein? lock order reversal 1st 0xc198eec0 pipe mutex @ ../../../kern/sys_pipe.c:779 2nd 0xc0367fe0

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend when I ^C'ed a buildworld earlier, with same kernel. May be it should go to Alfred Perlstein? lock order reversal 1st 0xc198eec0 pipe

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 09:08] wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I got another message that happend when I ^C'ed a buildworld earlier, with same kernel. May be it should go to

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:17:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein said words to the effect of; * Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 09:08] wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I

-current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I get this one on every single boot. We're not shipping the snapshot with that in place, right ? real memory = 268423168 (262132K bytes) avail memory = 257003520 (250980K bytes) acquiring duplicate lock of same type: thrd_sleep 1st @ ../../../vm/vm_map.c:2288 2nd @ ../../../vm/vm_kern.c:172

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get this one on every single boot. We're not shipping the snapshot with that in place, right ? real memory = 268423168 (262132K bytes) avail memory = 257003520 (250980K bytes) acquiring duplicate lock of same type: thrd_sleep 1st @

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hiten Pandya w rites: I haven't seen this. I built a kernel today, and I have a dual processor machine. Are you using any special kernel options, such as VFS_BIO_DEBUG or something, or am I talking nuts? :) Well, I have. On a single CPU net-booting -current.

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't seen this. I built a kernel today, and I have a dual processor machine. Are you using any special kernel options, such as VFS_BIO_DEBUG or something, or am I talking nuts? :) Well, I have. On a single CPU net-booting -current. No.

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:22:22 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Poul-Henning acquiring duplicate lock of same type: thrd_sleep Poul-Henning 1st @ ../../../vm/vm_map.c:2288 Poul-Henning 2nd @ ../../../vm/vm_kern.c:172 (snip) Poul-Henning

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I get this one on every single boot. We're not shipping the snapshot with that in place, right ? I assume this is from Brian's recent VM locking commit. Currently, it's on the list of commits to back out of the DP1 branch, assuming the issues

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 22:56:58 +0900, Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Seigo On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:22:22 +0100, Seigo Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Seigo Poul-Henning acquiring duplicate lock of same type: thrd_sleep Seigo Poul-Henning 1st @ ../../../vm/vm_map.c:2288 Seigo

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Lamont Granquist
I've seen this as well, -current from about 5 days ago, dual proc 1.4GHz K7 A7M266D with a 13GB IBM UDMA66 drive, GENERIC kernel + hints. On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: --- Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't seen this. I built a kernel today, and I have a dual

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-16 Thread Bill Fenner
Although I am still getting the following lock problems when I shut the system down: lock order reversal 1st 0xc036afc0 allproc @ ../../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:452 2nd 0xc7ecce34 filedesc structure @ ../../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:457 I've been seeing this since Feb 4. Bill To

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-25 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38:45AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike Barcroft wrote: Deprecated features should generate warnings. Ok, then let's call it Undocumented legacy support. I agree that features we don't want to support anymore

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-25 Thread Doug Barton
of specifying colours, and want to hold onto making the deprecated version include warnings. I could understand your argument if there were A) many different ways, or B) support for the one legacy method was complicated. But neither of these are true. Including a warning for something

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-25 Thread Terry Lambert
, and want to hold onto making the deprecated version include warnings. Just make the damn thing not work with the deprecated setup, remove the warnings, and handle the complaints. You're going to be handling the complaint either way. Or get rid of the warning, and avoid the complaints, and remove

LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-24 Thread Doug Barton
A couple months ago an improvement was added to the color support of ls to use a wider variety of colors, indicated by alphabet characters instead of numbers. While I think this is a good change, it included a warning when users have the old style numeric flags in their LSCOLORS variable

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-24 Thread Mike Barcroft
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A couple months ago an improvement was added to the color support of ls to use a wider variety of colors, indicated by alphabet characters instead of numbers. While I think this is a good change, it included a warning when users have the old style

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-24 Thread Doug Barton
Mike Barcroft wrote: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A couple months ago an improvement was added to the color support of ls to use a wider variety of colors, indicated by alphabet characters instead of numbers. While I think this is a good change, it included a warning

Re: LSCOLORS warning is silly

2002-02-24 Thread Mike Barcroft
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike Barcroft wrote: Deprecated features should generate warnings. Ok, then let's call it Undocumented legacy support. I agree that features we don't want to support anymore should generate warnings that encourage users to change. However, there

Re: possible world breakage warning..

2002-02-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: there may be greakage in gdb due th the commit today.. I'm waiting for my buildworld to get sround to it so I can test my fix.. julian the fix I am looking at testing is: Index: i386/kvm-fbsd.c

possible world breakage warning..

2002-02-11 Thread Julian Elischer
there may be greakage in gdb due th the commit today.. I'm waiting for my buildworld to get sround to it so I can test my fix.. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

possible world breakage warning..

2002-02-07 Thread Julian Elischer
there may be greakage in gdb due th the commit today.. I'm waiting for my buildworld to get sround to it so I can test my fix.. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: possible world breakage warning..

2002-02-07 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: there may be greakage in gdb due th the commit today.. I'm waiting for my buildworld to get sround to it so I can test my fix.. julian the fix I am looking at testing is: Index: i386/kvm-fbsd.c

WARNING: I plan to commit MFC this ncurses patch in anycase

2002-01-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
This is differences between our lib_baudrate and official variant, fixed at summer 2001. I constantly ask our ncurses maintainer (Peter) to commit this since summer 2001, but nothing happens, so I plan to do it in anycase even taking this file out of vendor branch since the bug must be fixed

WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/1

2001-11-29 Thread frf
ASR is still broken for SMP. WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/1 kernel panic: dont do that Tyan Thunder K7 with 2 1.2GHz Ahtlon's Adaptec 3200S Rev 3607 Current as of this morning. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 39:FF:7C:52:66:9D:B9:A3 EA:67:3C:7F:D1:B6:30:36 Polymer physicists

awk warning and MASTER_SORT_REGEX

2001-11-21 Thread CHOI Junho
Hi, About two weeks ago(maybe after -current awk updates), awk warns when I try to install any ports: /usr/ports/deskutils/dailystrips# make install clean dailystrips-1.0.20.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. awk: cmd. line:1: warning: escape sequence `\.' treated

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nick Hibma writes: : Yes. I have no idea why phk has not done this. Because the asr driver maintainer has asserted a strong lock in the past and phk doesn't have an asr card. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-30 Thread Jan Stocker
hangs: a) The kernel is loading b) acpi.ko is loading c) Pentium Pro MTRR support enable d) WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0 next is a kernel panic dont do that So whats on? Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
. I ve updated all files in /etc and remade all devices. Now a bootup hangs: a) The kernel is loading b) acpi.ko is loading c) Pentium Pro MTRR support enable d) WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0 next is a kernel panic dont do that Remove the asr driver from your kernel config until

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-30 Thread John Baldwin
/device.hints and installed the new kernel. I ve updated all files in /etc and remade all devices. Now a bootup hangs: a) The kernel is loading b) acpi.ko is loading c) Pentium Pro MTRR support enable d) WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0 next is a kernel panic dont do that Remove

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-30 Thread Warner Losh
made a new GENERIC kernel and copied the file : GENERIC.hints to /boot/device.hints and installed the new kernel. I ve : updated all files in /etc and remade all devices. Now a bootup hangs: : : a) The kernel is loading : b) acpi.ko is loading : c) Pentium Pro MTRR support enable : d) WARNING: Driver

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-30 Thread Scott Long
) acpi.ko is loading : c) Pentium Pro MTRR support enable : d) WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0 : : next is a kernel panic dont do that : : Remove the asr driver from your kernel config until somebody : fixes its use of destroy_dev() : : Maybe we should remove it from GENERIC

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >