On 8/28/23 12:00, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 28.08.2023 13:56, Pete Wright wrote:
So to be clear, if we were using the default autotrim=enabled behavior
we in fact weren't having our SSDs trimmed? I think that's my
concern, as an admin I was under the impression that it was enabled by
Hi,
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 20:00, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
> On 28.08.2023 13:56, Pete Wright wrote:
>> So to be clear, if we were using the default autotrim=enabled behavior we in
>> fact weren't having our SSDs trimmed? I think that's my concern, as an
>> admin I was under the impression
On 28.08.2023 13:56, Pete Wright wrote:
So to be clear, if we were using the default autotrim=enabled behavior
we in fact weren't having our SSDs trimmed? I think that's my concern,
as an admin I was under the impression that it was enabled by default
but apparently that wasn't actually
On 8/28/23 07:23, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi Pete,
On 27.08.2023 23:34, Pete Wright wrote:
looking at a recent pull of CURRENT i'm noticing this in the git logs:
#15079 set autotrim default to 'off' everywhere
which references this openzfs PR:
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15079
Hi Pete,
On 27.08.2023 23:34, Pete Wright wrote:
looking at a recent pull of CURRENT i'm noticing this in the git logs:
#15079 set autotrim default to 'off' everywhere
which references this openzfs PR:
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15079
looking at the PR i'm not seeing a reference to
looking at a recent pull of CURRENT i'm noticing this in the git logs:
#15079 set autotrim default to 'off' everywhere
which references this openzfs PR:
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15079
looking at the PR i'm not seeing a reference to a bug report or anything, is
anyone able to point
