In message <4f457ae8.4090...@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon writes:
> on 22/02/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following:
> > On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
> >
> > Same result, different memory address:
> >
> > supdrvGipCreate
On 02/22/2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/02/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
>>
>> Same result, different memory address:
>>
>> supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP pa
I'll give it a try on my testbed (which runs 9.0 and 8.2 -- my 7 partitions
don't have the ports to test it without taking a lot of time to build
prereqs).. If not tonight (PST) then I'll have some time Saturday evening.
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert
FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
on 22/02/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
>
> Same result, different memory address:
>
> supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
> vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, r
In message , Bernhard
Froehlich w
rites:
> On 22.02.2012 21:07, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message , Warren
> > Block
> > writ
> > es:
> >> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >> > on 22/02/2012 11:26 Doug Barton said the following:
> >> >> Meanwhile, the 4.0 version worked on this sam
On 22.02.2012 21:07, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message , Warren
Block
writ
es:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/02/2012 11:26 Doug Barton said the following:
>> Meanwhile, the 4.0 version worked on this same system ...
>
> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:27:47PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other
> > people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly
> > developed by Fedora.
In message , Warren Block
writ
es:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > on 22/02/2012 11:26 Doug Barton said the following:
> >> Meanwhile, the 4.0 version worked on this same system ...
> >
> > The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
>
> No visible difference here
Hi,
Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc4 have been uploaded to mediafire [2].
There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world
(help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users).
The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/02/2012 11:26 Doug Barton said the following:
Meanwhile, the 4.0 version worked on this same system ...
The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
No visible difference here, sorry.
__
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/22/2012 01:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following:
On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding file
in the port and re-test the port?
Good
On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
Same result, different memory address:
supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, rc=-8
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vboxdrv, 0xc66e8410, 0) erro
on 22/02/2012 11:26 Doug Barton said the following:
> Meanwhile, the 4.0 version worked on this same system ...
The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
--
Andriy Gapon
--- src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c.orig 2011-12-19
15:01:31.0 +0200
+++ src/
On 22.02.2012 10:46, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/22/2012 01:41, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
The 4.0.16 version is still available as
emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy
I know, that, but kind of beside the point, right?
Yes, but some people depend on a working virtualbox and that is their
safety net
On 02/22/2012 01:41, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> The 4.0.16 version is still available as emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy
I know, that, but kind of beside the point, right?
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowle
On 22.02.2012 10:26, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/22/2012 01:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following:
On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the
corresponding file
in the port and re-test the port?
Good
On 02/22/2012 01:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding
>>> file
>>> in the port and re-test the port?
>>
>> Good news, the kernel didn't
on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding
>> file
>> in the port and re-test the port?
>
> Good news, the kernel didn't panic. Bad news:
>
> supdrvGipCreate: failed t
18 matches
Mail list logo
