On 03/15/12 15:21, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
A number of FreeBSD kernel structures are dynamically created at
boot time - based on the amount of ram in the system. I would guess
if you boot your stripped BSD image on a virtual system with 64Mb of
ram you wouldn't see the kernel grow to 32MB
So ho
> Ted wrote in effect
> ... building ports from port src ...
Hopefully it was pretty clear that I'm referring solely to
binary packages here, not building ports from src. Those
aware of base vs. ports/pkgs should expect issues when
backtracking branches and 'not do that', it's not supported.
Howev
A number of FreeBSD kernel structures are dynamically created at
boot time - based on the amount of ram in the system. I would guess
if you boot your stripped BSD image on a virtual system with 64Mb of ram
you wouldn't see the kernel grow to 32MB
It would be interesting to see FreeBSD running
On 03/15/12 14:07, Super Bisquit wrote:
Apologies for that response. I read the message again. You may want to
cc da Rock with your reply.
Again, sorry about that.
Thats cool. I'm here too :)
On 3/15/12, Super Bisquit wrote:
On 3/14/12, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What do you regard as a "low
Apologies for that response. I read the message again. You may want to
cc da Rock with your reply.
Again, sorry about that.
On 3/15/12, Super Bisquit wrote:
> On 3/14/12, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> What do you regard as a "low memory" machine?
> On real hardware I've used:
> HTC Apache 64/128 R
On 3/14/12, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> What do you regard as a "low memory" machine?
On real hardware I've used:
HTC Apache 64/128 ROM/RAM
Embedded 486 with 5M RAM
Older tower maxed at 128M
I'd say anything less than 64M RAM for normal hardware, less than 32
for embedded.
Some systems do not have
What do you regard as a "low memory" machine?
Ted
On 3/13/2012 8:30 AM, Super Bisquit wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Da Rock<9phack...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: Kernel memory usage
To: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
On 03/13/
On 3/13/2012 11:20 PM, grarpamp wrote:
Hey all. Just noting that VirtualBox has gone
missing from the stable dirs other than
packages-9-stable. There are still some various
VBox components and versions present in the
various -stable and -release FTP dirs. But in
general, it seems something broke?
> Is it that 4.1.10 was released less than 24h ago and the ports
> are not updated yet?
Not at all, just an inventory. Lag time on new releases is totally
understandable. They need ported and tested. And life is first
priority :)
> Is it because 4.1.8 packages for 8-stable are not available?
Usi
On 14.03.2012 07:20, grarpamp wrote:
Hey all. Just noting that VirtualBox has gone
missing from the stable dirs other than
packages-9-stable. There are still some various
VBox components and versions present in the
various -stable and -release FTP dirs. But in
general, it seems something broke?
On 14.03.2012 13:59, MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro wrote:
Hi,
I also have this problem.
My environment is below
- FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE/amd64 and FreeBSD-10-current/i386
- Virtualbox 4.0.14(now I'm compiling new version 4.1.8)
- WI-FI HOSTAP mode(if_bridge)
I hope to use both function(Virtua
Hi,
I also have this problem.
My environment is below
- FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE/amd64 and FreeBSD-10-current/i386
- Virtualbox 4.0.14(now I'm compiling new version 4.1.8)
- WI-FI HOSTAP mode(if_bridge)
I hope to use both function(VirtualBox and if_bridge) at same.
Please let us to know the
Quoting Super Bisquit (from Tue, 13 Mar 2012
11:33:01 -0400):
Has Linux emulation on PowerPC been tested?
Also, if the required dependencies are downloaded, would the creation of a
$PATH/Linux directory be sufficient for the executing of binaries?
I don't know about the kernel side on Power
13 matches
Mail list logo
