On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
I'm using the attached program which I wrote today (don't ask why, I think
I just wanted to beat the heck out of FreeBSD!) I have maxusers 200, a
MAXFILES=65536, and the limits set to allow me to use the program
fully (all 3 ports; I don't want
The Linux philosophy has always been about simplistic cycle counting
exercises without understand whether the data had any meaning or not.
You've once again displayed your wholehearted participation in this
lack of understanding of what the data points might mean to any real-
world
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 12:13:43AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote:
I had a 3.2 stable (from 30 May 1999)machine panic tonight, trying
to load the oss driver, which is not too shocking. What was shocking
was the damage done to my filesystem. The automatic fsck failed,
with an UNEXPECTED SOFT
Hi,
I have tried getting my system to use DHCP on my local network, but I'm having
trouble.
If I don't use DHCP everything works fine, but if I use DHCP I get the
following messages appearing in my log file when I use ESD, and try and ping
my LAN IP.
Jun 13 17:35:21 guppy /kernel: arplookup
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 12:13:43AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote:
I had a 3.2 stable (from 30 May 1999)machine panic tonight, trying
to load the oss driver, which is not too shocking. What was shocking
was the damage done to my filesystem. The
Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org writes:
Another problem that came up with this: I originally started at port 1024.
I monopolized 3 ports (almost all consecutive, of course). When I try to
connect() a TCP socket as non-root, it fails with EAGAIN (I only tracked it
far enough down as
* We hack a fix to deal with the mmap/write case.
A permanent vnode locking fix is many months away because core
decided to ask Kirk to fix it, which was news to me at the time.
However, I agree with the idea of having Kirk fix VNode locking.
But since this
On 13 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org writes:
Another problem that came up with this: I originally started at port 1024.
I monopolized 3 ports (almost all consecutive, of course). When I try to
connect() a TCP socket as non-root, it fails with
Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org writes:
On 13 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
connect() normally uses the 1024-5000 range. Try the following:
# sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.last=4
and see if it solves the EAGAIN problem.
Actually, this is the perfect explanation. I
On 13 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org writes:
On 13 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
connect() normally uses the 1024-5000 range. Try the following:
# sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.last=4
and see if it solves the EAGAIN problem.
Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@flood.ping.uio.no writes:
This still doesn't explain select()'s failure to time out
Found it! If you change:
printf(no select() action);
to:
fprintf(stderr, no select() action\n);
you'll see that select() does time out.
The moral of this story is to
Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org writes:
On 13 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
BTW, you should check for errno == EINTR when select() returns -1.
The perror() is the status report for select() when -1.
Yeah, but EINTR is a normal condition, so I'd ignore it silently
instead of logging
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Bill Huey wrote:
The Linux philosophy has always been about simplistic cycle counting
exercises without understand whether the data had any meaning or not.
You've once again displayed your wholehearted participation in this
lack of understanding of what the data
[ cc'd to -hackers for the archives, reply-to points back to me so that
this doesn't perpetuate on the list ]
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 11:24:11PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
I came on this list initially to just check was the FreeBSD community
was like,
Then you chose the wrong list.
As the web
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Bill Huey wrote:
Well, so far I've heard alot of BS about Linux that isn't exactly true
and much of it seems like a bunch of artificial problems that hold
against the Linux folks. Most of it is just intentionally misrepresented
:On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Bernd Walter wrote:
:
: On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 12:13:43AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote:
: I had a 3.2 stable (from 30 May 1999)machine panic tonight, trying
: to load the oss driver, which is not too shocking. What was shocking
: was the damage done to my filesystem. The
:From the source code of vtruncbuf() in file vfs_subr.c, I find out that
:the code deals with the case when a buffer linked on the clean or dirty
:list of a vnode can change its identity (b_xflags flag, b_vp field, or
:B_DELWRI flag). For example, a buffer's B_VNCLEAN flag is cleared even if
:it
Hi !
I have a problem.
My program creates UDP-socket and after that it tries to create UDP or
TCP-socket. But last one doesn't work.
TCP doesn't execute accept
UDP doesn't execute recvfrom
What can I do ?
Answer me via e-mail:pa...@sdios.sea.ru
Thank you
Pavel
To
Linux is a Unix clone, while FreeBSD is Unix. Don't confuse people with
this.
I'm afraid that attitude isn't going to help Unix agains Windows...
I use FreeBSD for all my systems. I still go around and tell people that
Linux is one several Unix variants, and I intend to continue doing this.
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Southern Branch of the P.P.Shirshov Institute of
Oceanology wrote:
Hi !
I have a problem.
My program creates UDP-socket and after that it tries to create UDP or
TCP-socket. But last one doesn't work.
TCP doesn't execute accept
UDP doesn't execute recvfrom
What can I
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Linux is a Unix clone, while FreeBSD is Unix. Don't confuse people with
this.
I'm afraid that attitude isn't going to help Unix agains Windows...
I use FreeBSD for all my systems. I still go around and tell people that
Linux is one several
Sorry if I'm bothering you busy folk unnecessarily...
If I wanted to add variant symlinks, would that just require modifications
to namei, or is that way too simplistic?
Thanks,
Marc.
--
Marc Ramirez - OwnerGreat Big Throbbing Brains
mr...@gbtb.com
A permanent vnode locking fix is many months away because core
decided to ask Kirk to fix it, which was news to me at the time.
However, I agree with the idea of having Kirk fix VNode locking.
Actually, core did no such thing. Kirk told me a month or so ago that he
Greetings,
I purchased a 3Com EtherLink III LAN+33.6 Modem PCMCIA card only to find
that FreeBSD does not yet support the 3c562 controller. There was a post a
day or two ago that had this subject line:
sysnewconfig990609-kld990609test8.7.patch.gz
Does this patch give a 3.2-RELEASE support for
Not to pick on Brian, but can we end this pathetic and sorry thread
already? Everybody: Just play nice with your little brother and
stop poking him in the back seat - we'll get to where we're going
soon and then everybody can have a milkshake if they've been good.
Thank you.
- Jordan
To
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, John S. Dyson wrote:
Remember that you cannot assume that the mappings stay the same during
almost any I/O mechanism anymore. The issue of wiring pages and assuming
constant mapping has to be resolved. A careful definition of whether
or not one is doing I/O to an
Interesting. It's an overlapping same-process deadlock with mmap/write.
This bug also hits NFS, though in a slightly different way, and also
occurs with mmap/write when two processes are mmap'ing two files and
write()ing the other descriptor using the map as a buffer.
I see a
What, to the reckoning of the resident populace, would happen if
somebody were to rm a vnconfig'd swapfile while it was in use?
Thanks,
joelh
--
Joel Ray Holveck - jo...@gnu.org
Fourth law of programming:
Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
To
In article pine.bsf.3.96.990613141052.366b-100...@server.ghostgbtb.com you
write:
Sorry if I'm bothering you busy folk unnecessarily...
If I wanted to add variant symlinks, would that just require modifications
to namei, or is that way too simplistic?
I've done that part with help of Mike
Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly is meant by a variant link, and
what might one be used for?
Chuck Youse
Director of Systems
cyo...@cybersites.com
-Original Message-
From: Marc Ramirez mr...@gbtb.com
To: hack...@freebsd.org hack...@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, June 13, 1999 1:12 PM
On 13 Jun 1999, Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
What, to the reckoning of the resident populace, would happen if
somebody were to rm a vnconfig'd swapfile while it was in use?
My reckoning is that the dirent would be deleted, and that's it. It would
most likely go away when the system is restarted.
Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly is meant by a variant link, and
what might one be used for?
Gee, it's refreshing to see someone other than myself bringing this
subject up. :)
Variant symlinks, which many of us fell in love with back in our Apollo
days, are essentially just symlinks with
And have /usr/bin point to /binaries/i386/bin or /binaries/mips/bin
And before people jump on me, let me just clarify in advance that I
was not meaning to imply that Apollo ever used the x86 architecture.
They didn't. It was just an example. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
While installing 2.2.8R (from a CD which I got from cheapbytes) on a
486DX2 66, w/ 16Mb RAM, I get:
sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard
sc0: VGA mono 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0xefc0
fault code =
34 matches
Mail list logo
