Hi.
I have a question about new-bus code.
Currently device style of FreeBSD-4-current is changing to newbus.
But is there any plan to newbuslize for 3-stable?
If my patch for pcm/ESS sound chip apply to FreeBSD, may I send-pr
with old-config style?
Yes, current pcm sound driver is
Oh, I'm sorry, I made a mistake when posting code. I posted incorrectly
patched version... This version correct :
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/mman.h
#include unistd.h
#include fcntl.h
#include errno.h
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd;
int
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alton, Matthew) writes:
I am currently researching methods for implementing the 64-bit
syscalls stat64(), fstat64(), lseek64() etc. delineated in the
SGI design doc _64 Bit File Access_ by Adam Sweeney.
Do the design docs indicate how inode numbers should interact with
Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kenny Drobnack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but what's to keep from putting xfs in
FreeBSD? Is there something in the licenses that says you can't use
GPL'ed software and software under the BSD License together?
Yes. The BSD
Hi all
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to test(1),
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Graham Wheeler wrote:
Hi all
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't
-- snip --
if (pswitch) {
/*
* If the device is not configured up, we cannot put it
in
* promiscuous mode.
*/
if ((ifp-if_flags IFF_UP) == 0)
return (ENETDOWN);
Graham Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't it be a good
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:29:47 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
Or is the test for IFF_PROMISC made earlier in the code? You
should only print a disabled message when it has previously
been enabled so that log file watchers can always match up
the up/down pairs.
I've been using if.c modified
if (--ifp-if_pcount 0)
return (0);
ifp-if_flags = ~IFF_PROMISC;
---log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
---ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
Shouldn't this be:
if (ipf-if_flags
On 12 Aug 1999 11:42:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
NetBSD's test(1) utility has this (-nt and -ot). We should probably
merge in their changes.
Their code isn't useful in this case, since they've merged in a
pdksh-derived version of test. How about we do the same? :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:29:47 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
Or is the test for IFF_PROMISC made earlier in the code? You
should only print a disabled message when it has previously
been enabled so that log file watchers can always match up
the up/down pairs.
I've
On 12 Aug 1999 11:01:06 +0200
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prevents you from relicensing BSD software under the GPL. It does
not prevent you from selling an OS that has both BSD and GPL bits, as
long as the GPL bits come with full source.
If you have an executable
Jason Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12 Aug 1999 11:01:06 +0200 Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prevents you from relicensing BSD software under the GPL. It does
not prevent you from selling an OS that has both BSD and GPL bits, as
long as the GPL bits come with
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:20:35 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is
required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous
interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous
mode was never enabled in the
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
--
Aaron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:18:50AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to
Aaron Smith wrote:
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
Portability is a Good Thing, but I write a lot of one-off scripts
in which portability isn't an issue. Also, just because one uses
standard
Hi,
At 4:01 am -0700 12/8/99, Aaron Smith wrote:
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
Further, isn't test a builtin for most (all?) shells? Sounds like a can of
worms to me...
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:26:41 GMT, Bob Bishop wrote:
Further, isn't test a builtin for most (all?) shells? Sounds like a can of
worms to me...
If your only motivation for saying it's a can of worms is that test is
usually a builtin, don't sweat it. Lots of scripts insist on using
/bin/test .
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:22:39 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Their code isn't useful in this case, since they've merged in a
pdksh-derived version of test. How about we do the same? :-)
By the way, OpenBSD have _also_ incorporated NetBSD's test. *evil.grin*
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe:
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to test(1),
to compare files based on criteria like size or modification date?
So far it has been policy for FreeBSD not to add options to
commandline utilities that are replaceable by simple shell script
constructs. Especially if
"Steven Jurczyk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How fast get real / absolute path of specified file. I try use
readlink, but this slow (for path /home/web/docs/index.htm must be
done 4 or more (if this path have symlinks) readlink's - for /home,
/home/web, /home/web/docs and
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: What do you all think about growing a gnu subdirectory in src/lib/libcompat?
: Things like a getopt_long implementation (yes, if it will be accepted,
: I am volunteering to write it...) would
But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is
required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous
interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous
mode was never enabled in the first place?
Like I said, I seem to get the
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
On 12 Aug 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Graham Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this.
Brian F. Feldman wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: What do you all think about growing a gnu subdirectory in src/lib/libcompat?
: Things like a getopt_long implementation (yes, if it will be accepted,
: I am
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote:
If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
Just stick it into libcompat.
That doesn't fit with the current organization.
Choose:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl writes:
: If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
: libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
: directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
: Just stick it into libcompat.
Or libiberty :-) That way we can have a GPL-free
Brian F. Feldman wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote:
If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
Just stick it into libcompat.
That doesn't fit with the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: There
: is simply no reason to assume that anything under a gnu directory is GPLd,
: or that anything GPLd is going to be under a gnu directory (which it's not.)
I'm afraid there is. It has been stated many times in the past that
all
A long time ago I got some kinky modifications to telnet from a
place in Germany the purpose of which was to encrypt telnet sessions.
It did a Diffie-Hellman up front and used the common secret as a DES
key sort of the way Kerberos does. It was called SRA telnet. It was
vulnerable to
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote:
Brian F. Feldman wrote:
If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
Just stick it into libcompat.
How about libcompat/gnuish?
I am attempting to get FreeBSD 3.2 and/or 4.0 to go on a TP 360c. The
problem I am having is that the keyboard works all the way up to sysinstall.
I can use the keyboard in the visual kernel config/etc. I searched and found
under 2.2 they suggested setting flags 0x10 on syscons. 0x10
That's because the resolver on the Sun box is archaic, whereas FreeBSD has
an up-to-date (and legal) resolver.
Can't remember which RFC defined the '_' as being illegal off-hand...but
all modern resolvers will react the same. That site admin must be running
an old implementation of BIND (or
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Michael Mannsberger wrote:
ping www.atayatirim.com.tr works under Sun but not in FreeBSD - why?
FreeBSD doesn't like "_" in a URL
Uhm, that's a hostname, but yes, FreeBSD doesn't like it. Windows is
okay with it, however.
Hi,
What is the path of least resistance for getting an unsupported ISA
PnP device to the point where you can do I/O to it (inb,outb)?
Do I need a driver, or is there some general purpose way for
getting the device "up" to the point that you can use /dev/io and a user
space application? (on
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:31:27AM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote:
In the scrypto section, I see that the telnet stuff is set aside
nicely in its own spot. I was able to add my patches just fine,
but it appears that the Makefiles are somewhere else. Maybe in
with the kerberos stuff or something?
Well, I am the person who has this problem.
The RFCs does not explicitly say that we should not use underscore
character
as far as I understood. But it suggests which characters we should use.
Also in RFC1033 it says (well the status of this one is UNKNOWN though)
Cillian Sharkey scribbled this message on Aug 12:
is the system still booting off the IDE disk (if present) ?
Yes. But not from the SCSI
You can try setting the BIOS to boot from the SCSI disk which should
do the trick..unless you have a crappy BIOS that doesn't let you do
that.. :(
Well, I am the person who has this problem.
The RFCs does not explicitly say that we should not use underscore
character
as far as I understood. But it suggests which characters we should use.
RFC 952
1. A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up
to 24
Well, I am the person who has this problem.
The RFCs does not explicitly say that we should not use underscore
character
as far as I understood. But it suggests which characters we should use.
RFC 952
1. A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up
to 24
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
Well, I am the person who has this problem.
The RFCs does not explicitly say that we should not use underscore
character
as far as I understood.
This is a common misunderstanding. The only valid characters in
hostnames to be used on the
But the DNS is used to hold all sorts of information. For example, how do
you reconcile domain names like:
42.10.202.144.IN-ADDR.ARPA
in the DNS? It violates the "starts with alpha" "requirement" in 952 and 1101
that you quotes, yet we use these things all the time. In fact, you
Today Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
RFC 952
1. A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up
to 24 characters drawn from the alphabet (A-Z), digits (0-9), minus
sign (-), and period (.). Note that periods are only allowed when
they serve to delimit
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
But the DNS is used to hold all sorts of information. For example, how do
you reconcile domain names like:
42.10.202.144.IN-ADDR.ARPA
in the DNS? It violates the "starts with alpha" "requirement" in 952 and 1101
E.. even
How do I reconcile it? Well I must admit that I have not seen that one
before. However just because there is a domain out there that is incorrect
and will resolve does not mean that we should allow others. The way I
reconcile this is that we need a patch for the resolver and I will be sure
That IS a violation of the standard, since A records
are not valid for hosts in in-addr.arpa.
And next I suppose you'll tell me that PTR records are not valid
outsize of the IN-ADDR.ARPA portion of the DNS namespace?
What people really miss is that the DNS is a distributed database
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Addr.com Web Hosting wrote:
It happened more often then I am comfortable with (twice per day on one
occasion). This is a machine running FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE on dual PII 400
with 1GB of ram and a DPT raid card. The machine is running semi-heavy load
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
src/lib/libgnucompat seems to be the best suggestion so far. I wonder
where the line between libgnucompat and libfreebsdextension is,
though.
I've only been active here a few weeks but I've grown used to the "go
ahead and do it" I know I'm about to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking at the STAILQ macros defined in sys/queue.h and I am
curious why it is necessary to declare stqh_last in the STAILQ_HEAD
as a pointer to pointer, rather than just a pointer? (like the head
pointer)
When the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Louis A. Mamakos" writes:
: It violates the "starts with alpha" "requirement" in 952 and 1101
: that you quotes, yet we use these things all the time.
That requirement has been relaxed. See RFC 1123.
Bottom line is that _ is an illegal character in a hostname,
In message 25455.934497542@localhost "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
: So Solaris does the right thing by understanding underscore I guess.
: Since it is not forbidden to use it in hostnames.
:
: It does not do the right thing and it is indeed forbidden. :)
Also, all modern versions of bind
I'm attempting to build the X11 libs with the thread safety stuff (I beleive
Linux can already be built like this) and have discovered when linking that we
don't have the getpwnam_r getpwuid_r functions in out libc_r. Is anyone
planning on adding these?
Stephen
It's all part of my
I am attempting to get FreeBSD 3.2 and/or 4.0 to go on a TP 360c. The
problem I am having is that the keyboard works all the way up to sysinstall.
I can use the keyboard in the visual kernel config/etc. I searched and foun
d
under 2.2 they suggested setting flags 0x10 on syscons. 0x10
If my patch for pcm/ESS sound chip apply to FreeBSD, may I send-pr
with old-config style?
Yes, current pcm sound driver is old-config, but "Cameron Grant"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is working to newbuslize.
I create patch for 4-current sys/i386/isa/snd. It fix for
pcm/ESS-ISA sound driver.
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 02:21:11PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
I don't care if most of the
directories called "gnu" in the current tree contain GPLd code. How
I had to read your message about 4
You are quite right that the code in question was just moved from sc
to atkbd and there is essentially no difference between the two
versions.
This is the first time that I hear the flag 0x10 for sc works in 2.X,
but the flag 0x4 for atkbd does not in 3.1 or later :-( I think
I heard
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One solution would be to map clean R+W pages RO and force a write fault
to occur, allowing the system to recognize that there are too many dirty
pages in vm_fault before it is too
:On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Addr.com Web Hosting wrote:
:
: It happened more often then I am comfortable with (twice per day on one
: occasion). This is a machine running FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE on dual PII 400
: with 1GB of ram and a DPT raid card. The machine is running semi-heavy load
:
Arun Sharma wrote:
The second alternative - to mark system daemons as special
sounds much more attractive.
Ok, now define the difference between "system daemons" and any other
daemon (or, for that matter, any other process).
- mark
Mark Newton
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files.
I've written programs to do this before as well. A more portable
approach is
find file1 -newer file2 ...
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to test(1),
On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 03:04:43PM +0930, Mark Newton wrote:
Arun Sharma wrote:
The second alternative - to mark system daemons as special
sounds much more attractive.
Ok, now define the difference between "system daemons" and any other
daemon (or, for that matter, any other
What is the (default) maximum number of simultanous NFS mounts in
FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2?
I was looking at 3.2 and it appears that 63 is the max, and this is
tunable with kernel config option NFS_MUIDHASHSIZ. Is this correct?
What is the maximum possible setting?
Last, where could I have
Hi.
I have a question about new-bus code.
Currently device style of FreeBSD-4-current is changing to newbus.
But is there any plan to newbuslize for 3-stable?
If my patch for pcm/ESS sound chip apply to FreeBSD, may I send-pr
with old-config style?
Yes, current pcm sound driver is
Oh, I'm sorry, I made a mistake when posting code. I posted incorrectly
patched version... This version correct :
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/mman.h
#include unistd.h
#include fcntl.h
#include errno.h
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd;
int i;
is the system still booting off the IDE disk (if present) ?
Yes. But not from the SCSI
You can try setting the BIOS to boot from the SCSI disk which should
do the trick..unless you have a crappy BIOS that doesn't let you do
that.. :(
With fdisk I set the partition as bootable on the SCSI
matthew.al...@anheuser-busch.com (Alton, Matthew) writes:
I am currently researching methods for implementing the 64-bit
syscalls stat64(), fstat64(), lseek64() etc. delineated in the
SGI design doc _64 Bit File Access_ by Adam Sweeney.
Do the design docs indicate how inode numbers should
ch...@calldei.com (Chris Costello) writes:
I'm in favor of a libgnucompat rather than gnu functions in
libcompat.
And how would a libgnucompat be different from libiberty? Except of
course that it would be maintained by the FreeBSD folks... Or that it
would be maintained at all. ;--)
Tony Finch d...@dotat.at writes:
Kenny Drobnack kdrob...@mission.mvnc.edu wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but what's to keep from putting xfs in
FreeBSD? Is there something in the licenses that says you can't use
GPL'ed software and software under the BSD License together?
Yes. The
Hi all
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to test(1),
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Graham Wheeler wrote:
Hi all
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't
-- snip --
if (pswitch) {
/*
* If the device is not configured up, we cannot put it
in
* promiscuous mode.
*/
if ((ifp-if_flags IFF_UP) == 0)
return (ENETDOWN);
Graham Wheeler g...@cequrux.com writes:
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but it set me
thinking - wouldn't it be a good
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:29:47 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
Or is the test for IFF_PROMISC made earlier in the code? You
should only print a disabled message when it has previously
been enabled so that log file watchers can always match up
the up/down pairs.
I've been using if.c modified exactly
if (--ifp-if_pcount 0)
return (0);
ifp-if_flags = ~IFF_PROMISC;
---log(LOG_INFO, %s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n,
---ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
Shouldn't this be:
if (ipf-if_flags
On 12 Aug 1999 11:42:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
NetBSD's test(1) utility has this (-nt and -ot). We should probably
merge in their changes.
Their code isn't useful in this case, since they've merged in a
pdksh-derived version of test. How about we do the same? :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:29:47 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
Or is the test for IFF_PROMISC made earlier in the code? You
should only print a disabled message when it has previously
been enabled so that log file watchers can always match up
the up/down pairs.
I've
On 12 Aug 1999 11:01:06 +0200
Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@flood.ping.uio.no wrote:
This prevents you from relicensing BSD software under the GPL. It does
not prevent you from selling an OS that has both BSD and GPL bits, as
long as the GPL bits come with full source.
If you have an
Jason Thorpe thor...@nas.nasa.gov writes:
On 12 Aug 1999 11:01:06 +0200 Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@flood.ping.uio.no
wrote:
This prevents you from relicensing BSD software under the GPL. It does
not prevent you from selling an OS that has both BSD and GPL bits, as
long as the GPL bits
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:20:35 GMT, Niall Smart wrote:
But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is
required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous
interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous
mode was never enabled in the
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
--
Aaron Smith
aa...@mutex.org
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:18:50AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to
Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
One solution would be to map clean R+W pages RO and force a write fault
to occur, allowing the system to recognize that there are too many dirty
pages in vm_fault before it is too late and flush some of them. The
downside of this
Aaron Smith wrote:
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
Portability is a Good Thing, but I write a lot of one-off scripts
in which portability isn't an issue. Also, just because one uses
standard
Hi,
At 4:01 am -0700 12/8/99, Aaron Smith wrote:
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
Further, isn't test a builtin for most (all?) shells? Sounds like a can of
worms to me...
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:26:41 GMT, Bob Bishop wrote:
Further, isn't test a builtin for most (all?) shells? Sounds like a can of
worms to me...
If your only motivation for saying it's a can of worms is that test is
usually a builtin, don't sweat it. Lots of scripts insist on using
/bin/test .
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:15:52 +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
Portability is a Good Thing, but I write a lot of one-off scripts
in which portability isn't an issue.
Not to mention that following NetBSD's lead on issues relating to
portability probably is seldom a bad idea. :-)
Give PR 13091 a
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:22:39 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Their code isn't useful in this case, since they've merged in a
pdksh-derived version of test. How about we do the same? :-)
By the way, OpenBSD have _also_ incorporated NetBSD's test. *evil.grin*
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send
thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests to test(1),
to compare files based on criteria like size or modification date?
So far it has been policy for FreeBSD not to add options to
commandline utilities that are replaceable by simple shell script
constructs. Especially if
Steven Jurczyk st...@home.pl writes:
How fast get real / absolute path of specified file. I try use
readlink, but this slow (for path /home/web/docs/index.htm must be
done 4 or more (if this path have symlinks) readlink's - for /home,
/home/web, /home/web/docs and /home/web/docs/index.htm). Is
Jung, Michael mj...@npc.net writes:
Ok How does one recreate /dev/lkm for 4.0-Current? It is no longer
in /dev/MAKEDEV.
There's no LKM support in -current any longer.
/assar
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
hello,
I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition fat16.
thanks.
--
flav
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908112337400.81521-100...@janus.syracuse.net
Brian F. Feldman writes:
: What do you all think about growing a gnu subdirectory in src/lib/libcompat?
: Things like a getopt_long implementation (yes, if it will be accepted,
: I
In message 199908121645.qaa13...@hermes.epita.fr free bsd writes:
: I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition fat16.
fdisk to mark the partion as fat16, newfs_msdos to splat a file system
onto it.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is
required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous
interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous
mode was never enabled in the first place?
Like I said, I seem to get the
On 12 Aug 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Graham Wheeler g...@cequrux.com writes:
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this. In the end I worked around this by using make(1), but
gentlemen,
i am writing a short article on differences between 4.0 vs 3.2 versions
for our corporate magazine - it's focused especially on
networking/hacking. Is there a list of new features/approach ?
Or what is your experience ? (i am testing myself, but more people == more
interesting
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
On 12 Aug 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Graham Wheeler g...@cequrux.com writes:
I was writing a script yesterday, and I wanted to have a test to compare
the modification time of two files. test(1) doesn't have the ability to
do this.
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199908121645.qaa13...@hermes.epita.fr free bsd writes:
: I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition fat16.
fdisk to mark the partion as fat16, newfs_msdos to splat a file system
onto it.
Warner
This should
Brian F. Feldman wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908112337400.81521-100...@janus.syracuse.net
Brian F. Feldman writes:
: What do you all think about growing a gnu subdirectory in
src/lib/libcompat?
: Things like a getopt_long implementation
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote:
If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
Just stick it into libcompat.
That doesn't fit with the current organization.
Choose:
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
