Wasn't there already a project that did this??? The project name escapes
me, but I believe it was linked from the FreeBSD Projects page...
-marc
Marc Nicholas netSTOR Technologies, Inc. http://www.netstor.com
"Fast, Expandable and
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:30:02 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
> Acutally, the Nintendo 64 uses the Vr4300 series of chips from NEC.
!!!
I've been dethreading this subject line for a few days now, so I'm quite
relieved to see this, the one e-mail message which I happened to check in
on to make sure tha
In message Narvi
writes:
: > Nintendo 64 uses MIPS.
: >
:
: Which doesn't matter all that much. MIPS cpus for nintendo could be made
: by say MISP, not SGI (and SGI sold/is trying to sell MIPS).
Acutally, the Nintendo 64 uses the Vr4300 series of chips from NEC. I
think the new Nintendo will
In message <19990816164048.28824.rocketm...@web1001.mail.yahoo.com>
Brian McGroarty writes:
: So do the old and new Playstation models. The MIPS core is being
: manufactured by several companies: IDT alone has something like
: a dozen variants available with and without MMU, FP, 5000 vs
: 1 co
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:51:27 -0400, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
>
> I have questions.
Seek Ye first the kingdom of Mark.
(markm)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:45:28 -0400, "Stephen J. Roznowski" wrote:
> On a stock system (3.2 and 4.0), how much RAM will a system be able to
> use? Will a stock system use all 4GB?
I expect that someone else will answer your question. I just want to clear
up a possible misunderstanding that could
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:48:22 MST, dannyman wrote:
> The point of it is, it's easy enough to download the floppies, but
> it's really hard to boot a system off an .flp image. :p
Presumably you saw the posted trick about dd'ing the floppy image to
your swap partition and booting off _that_? :-)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Narvi writes:
: > Nintendo 64 uses MIPS.
: >
:
: Which doesn't matter all that much. MIPS cpus for nintendo could be made
: by say MISP, not SGI (and SGI sold/is trying to sell MIPS).
Acutally, the Nintendo 64 uses the Vr4300 series of chips from NEC. I
think the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian McGroarty writes:
: So do the old and new Playstation models. The MIPS core is being
: manufactured by several companies: IDT alone has something like
: a dozen variants available with and without MMU, FP, 5000 vs
: 1 core, etc. and is in far wider use tha
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:51:27 -0400, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
>
> I have questions.
Seek Ye first the kingdom of Mark.
(markm)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hac
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:45:28 -0400, "Stephen J. Roznowski" wrote:
> On a stock system (3.2 and 4.0), how much RAM will a system be able to
> use? Will a stock system use all 4GB?
I expect that someone else will answer your question. I just want to clear
up a possible misunderstanding that coul
Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
I have questions.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| win...@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL| ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | I
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:48:22 MST, dannyman wrote:
> The point of it is, it's easy enough to download the floppies, but
> it's really hard to boot a system off an .flp image. :p
Presumably you saw the posted trick about dd'ing the floppy image to
your swap partition and booting off _that_? :-)
Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
I have questions.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL| ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent |
I've looked at http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ51.html, but the answer
seems to be lacking...
On a stock system (3.2 and 4.0), how much RAM will a system be able to
use? Will a stock system use all 4GB?
Thanks,
--
Stephen J. Roznowski(s...@home.net)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@fr
> > > > 2. Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> > >
> > > I'd vote againsts your implimentation suggestion for VOP_ADVLOCK on an
> > > efficiency concern. If we actually make a VOP call, that should be the
> > > end of the story. I.e either add a vnode flag to indicate pas/f
On 17-Aug-99 Julian Elischer wrote:
> vnc is cool, but also check out back-orafice
> (not sure where you get it but the new one can take over NT as well as
> W95)
BO2K does NT (much to MS's chagrin)...
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.c
vnc is cool, but also check out back-orafice
(not sure where you get it but the new one can take over NT as well as
W95)
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
> I need to remote-control an NT behind a unix-box running
> nat-proxy/firewall/gateway.
>
> Would it be possible first to connect fro
I've looked at http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ51.html, but the answer
seems to be lacking...
On a stock system (3.2 and 4.0), how much RAM will a system be able to
use? Will a stock system use all 4GB?
Thanks,
--
Stephen J. Roznowski([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
> > > > 2. Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> > >
> > > I'd vote againsts your implimentation suggestion for VOP_ADVLOCK on an
> > > efficiency concern. If we actually make a VOP call, that should be the
> > > end of the story. I.e either add a vnode flag to indicate pas/
On 17-Aug-99 Julian Elischer wrote:
> vnc is cool, but also check out back-orafice
> (not sure where you get it but the new one can take over NT as well as
> W95)
BO2K does NT (much to MS's chagrin)...
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.
dannyman wrote:
> The point of it is, it's easy enough to download the floppies, but
> it's really hard to boot a system off an .flp image. :p
1. boot single-user
2. dd if=/some/dir/boot.flp of=/dev/da0s1b
3. reboot
4. When boot1 gives you the 5-second paused baton, press any key
5. enter
vnc is cool, but also check out back-orafice
(not sure where you get it but the new one can take over NT as well as
W95)
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
> I need to remote-control an NT behind a unix-box running
> nat-proxy/firewall/gateway.
>
> Would it be possible first to connect fr
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:51:10 MST, dannyman wrote:
>
> > Uhmmm, what if we don't have a floppy drive?
>
> Then you probably have a CDROM drive or a network interface, both of
> which can be used to get sysinstall onto your machine. :
dannyman wrote:
> The point of it is, it's easy enough to download the floppies, but
> it's really hard to boot a system off an .flp image. :p
1. boot single-user
2. dd if=/some/dir/boot.flp of=/dev/da0s1b
3. reboot
4. When boot1 gives you the 5-second paused baton, press any key
5. enter
> Mark Jaffe wrote:
> >
> > CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> > 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> > running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> > "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
>
> Anyone help?
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:51:10 MST, dannyman wrote:
>
> > Uhmmm, what if we don't have a floppy drive?
>
> Then you probably have a CDROM drive or a network interface, both of
> which can be used to get sysinstall onto your machine.
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > 2.Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> > I'd vote againsts your implimentation suggestion for VOP_ADVLOCK on an
> > efficiency concern. If we actually make a VOP call, that should be the
> > end of the story. I.e either add
According to Mark Jaffe:
> > CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> > 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> > running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> > "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
> >
> > I'll post this
> Mark Jaffe wrote:
> >
> > CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> > 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> > running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> > "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
>
> Anyone help?
Hello Andrew,
When filling your struct ip *iphead, try replacing:
iphead->ip_len = htons(length);
with:
iphead->ip_len = length;
or, for portability reasons, you may want to do something like:
#ifdef LINUX || OpenBSD21
#define BO(x) htons(x)
#else
#def
I need to remote-control an NT behind a unix-box running
nat-proxy/firewall/gateway.
Would it be possible first to connect from the outside to a vnc-server on
gateway, then to run vnc-client on the gateway to connect to a vnc-server
on the nt?
Or is it possible to have a vnc-proxy on the gateway
> Hi,
>
> To all you low-level kernel and bootloader hackers: what would it take to
> save and restore a running system image (presumably from dedicated raw
> partition) so that the system would continue where it left before reboot?
>
> It doesn't sound that difficult to me - after all, laptops s
Hi,
To all you low-level kernel and bootloader hackers: what would it take to
save and restore a running system image (presumably from dedicated raw
partition) so that the system would continue where it left before reboot?
It doesn't sound that difficult to me - after all, laptops somehow do it -
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > 2.Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> > I'd vote againsts your implimentation suggestion for VOP_ADVLOCK on an
> > efficiency concern. If we actually make a VOP call, that should be the
> > end of the story. I.e either ad
According to Mark Jaffe:
> > CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> > 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> > running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> > "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
> >
> > I'll post this
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> > But I can't get anyone interested :-(
> Uh, we're all interested; where's the code?
v9fs is the first piece. The servers are done. But I'm mostly out of the
freebsd hacking business at this point (except for maybe via drivers) so I
need some help to get
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
> > It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
> > potentially, a seperation of credentials from the process into
> > a session manager.
>
> Yeah but you can fake it p
Hello Andrew,
When filling your struct ip *iphead, try replacing:
iphead->ip_len = htons(length);
with:
iphead->ip_len = length;
or, for portability reasons, you may want to do something like:
#ifdef LINUX || OpenBSD21
#define BO(x) htons(x)
#else
#de
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
> It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
> potentially, a seperation of credentials from the process into
> a session manager.
Yeah but you can fake it pretty well witho
I need to remote-control an NT behind a unix-box running
nat-proxy/firewall/gateway.
Would it be possible first to connect from the outside to a vnc-server on
gateway, then to run vnc-client on the gateway to connect to a vnc-server
on the nt?
Or is it possible to have a vnc-proxy on the gateway
> Hi,
>
> To all you low-level kernel and bootloader hackers: what would it take to
> save and restore a running system image (presumably from dedicated raw
> partition) so that the system would continue where it left before reboot?
>
> It doesn't sound that difficult to me - after all, laptops
Hi,
To all you low-level kernel and bootloader hackers: what would it take to
save and restore a running system image (presumably from dedicated raw
partition) so that the system would continue where it left before reboot?
It doesn't sound that difficult to me - after all, laptops somehow do it
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> > But I can't get anyone interested :-(
> Uh, we're all interested; where's the code?
v9fs is the first piece. The servers are done. But I'm mostly out of the
freebsd hacking business at this point (except for maybe via drivers) so I
need some help to ge
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
> > It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
> > potentially, a seperation of credentials from the process into
> > a session manager.
>
> Yeah but you can fake it
> > 2. Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> >
> > Advisory locks are passed into VOP_ADVLOCK in each FS
> > instance, and then each FS applies this by hanging the
> > locks off a list on a private backing object. For FFS,
> > this is the in core inode.
> >
> >
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
> It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
> potentially, a seperation of credentials from the process into
> a session manager.
Yeah but you can fake it pretty well with
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 08:22:02PM +, Terry Lambert wrote:
> This is actually the problem at issue in an SMBFS implementation,
> and for which the Linux guys punted: the credential in SMB is
> per connection, not per user.
Per connection creds suck performance wise (=I haven't seen an implemen
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > I am currently conducting a thorough study of the VFS subsystem
> > in preparation for an all-out effort to port SGI's XFS filesystem to
> > FreeBSD 4.x at such time as SGI gives up the code. Matt Dillon
> > has written in hackers- that the VFS subsys
> > Cool, another non-exportable system available to US users only. :-)
>
> Yeah... isn't it time you Yanks got together and stormed that Trade Dept?
> I mean, if you can get excited over a few wooden crates containing tea...
>
> ;-) ;-)
Pound for pound (no pun intended), Tea was much more expen
> > 2. Advisory locks are hung off private backing objects.
> >
> > Advisory locks are passed into VOP_ADVLOCK in each FS
> > instance, and then each FS applies this by hanging the
> > locks off a list on a private backing object. For FFS,
> > this is the in core inode.
> >
> >
> Actually, i'd expect far fewer problems for the private mounts than for
> user mounts which modify the name space for all processes ...
The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
potentially, a seperation of credent
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 08:22:02PM +, Terry Lambert wrote:
> This is actually the problem at issue in an SMBFS implementation,
> and for which the Linux guys punted: the credential in SMB is
> per connection, not per user.
Per connection creds suck performance wise (=I haven't seen an impleme
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > I am currently conducting a thorough study of the VFS subsystem
> > in preparation for an all-out effort to port SGI's XFS filesystem to
> > FreeBSD 4.x at such time as SGI gives up the code. Matt Dillon
> > has written in hackers- that the VFS subsy
I wonder if anyone here could perhaps of be assistance, Im currently
playing with implementing certain things in trusted bsd to do with ip
security classes and how the system responds to security bits, and
implementing certain things the stack etc. However my first piece of test
code playing with
> > Cool, another non-exportable system available to US users only. :-)
>
> Yeah... isn't it time you Yanks got together and stormed that Trade Dept?
> I mean, if you can get excited over a few wooden crates containing tea...
>
> ;-) ;-)
Pound for pound (no pun intended), Tea was much more expe
> Actually, i'd expect far fewer problems for the private mounts than for
> user mounts which modify the name space for all processes ...
The concept of private namespaces does not exist on FreeBSD.
It would require a modification of the lookup mechanism, and,
potentially, a seperation of creden
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > For an interesting take on all this visit www.mipsabi.org
> Uh, that site is dead, as of the end of this month. See the
> first link ("announcement").
Precisely my point ...
ron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscri
I have tried to debug a kernel by simulating a panic without success. I
have read the handbook and searched the mailinglist. I even tried not to
strip the debug kernel at all. Still I get the above message and I do not
know how to go on. The following are the commands that I used:
now5# gdb -k
I wonder if anyone here could perhaps of be assistance, Im currently
playing with implementing certain things in trusted bsd to do with ip
security classes and how the system responds to security bits, and
implementing certain things the stack etc. However my first piece of test
code playing with
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
>
> Are you sure about this? Having constant p, g, x and y for every
> telnet client and server surely makes it much easier to attack? In theory
> you could probably pregenerate all of the arithmetic.
Maybe we're not using the constant names the same way.
In SRA the modulu
Mark Jaffe wrote:
>
> Jordan,
>
> CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
>
> I'll post this to
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Larry Lile wrote:
> I am feeling a little dense today, how do you allocate a
> dma channel for a PCI busmaster device with newbus?
I don't think PCI devices use the ISA DMA controller.
"It just works." (EISA has this advantage too.)
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > For an interesting take on all this visit www.mipsabi.org
> Uh, that site is dead, as of the end of this month. See the
> first link ("announcement").
Precisely my point ...
ron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
I have tried to debug a kernel by simulating a panic without success. I
have read the handbook and searched the mailinglist. I even tried not to
strip the debug kernel at all. Still I get the above message and I do not
know how to go on. The following are the commands that I used:
now5# gdb -
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
>
> Are you sure about this? Having constant p, g, x and y for every
> telnet client and server surely makes it much easier to attack? In theory
> you could probably pregenerate all of the arithmetic.
Maybe we're not using the constant names the same way.
In SRA the modul
The VMWare guest OS page for FreeBSD
(http://www.vmware.com/support/technotesfreebsd.html) states,
---
One caveat with all versions of FreeBSD is that there is a problem probing
for the CD-ROM device wdc1; FreeBSD sends an illegal ATAPI command to the
IDE controller and ignores the error status re
Mark Jaffe wrote:
>
> Jordan,
>
> CVS is issuing an "out of memory" message on attempting to checkin a
> 12MB file. What can I do? There is 300M of swap on the machine, it is
> running FreeBSD 2.2.8, and CVS says:
> "Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.26 (client/server)"
>
> I'll post this to
I don't think that this is an appropriate forum but I will put in my two
cents nonetheless. At least as of a couple of years age MIPS was the most
widely used embedded processor in the world. Thus, MIPS is in no way
dependent on IRIX. Not to mention that Linux runs on MIPS.
Sorry for not responding to this earlier, I missed it in my inbox.
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Nick Sayer wrote:
> > Where do you store the keys, or do you generate them dynamically? The
> > latter would take time to verify primality.
>
> If by "keys" you mean the DH generator and such, they are consta
At 4:19 PM + 8/16/99, Terry Lambert wrote:
Begging your pardon, but:
| --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
| key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
| Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
| entirely to Intel Corp
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > > > of XFS, without IRIX becomin
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Larry Lile wrote:
> I am feeling a little dense today, how do you allocate a
> dma channel for a PCI busmaster device with newbus?
I don't think PCI devices use the ISA DMA controller.
"It just works." (EISA has this advantage too.)
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280
> > These paragraphs are contradictory. It implies an end to MIPS.
> >
> > Nintendo 64 uses MIPS.
> >
> > It also seems a bit overzealous.
>
> No argument here. Perhaps they're just trying to float a few trial
> baloons in hopes of finding something popular/feasable.
That was my take on thi
> I lost track of the quotes.
>
> > > | --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
> > > | key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
> > > | Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
> > > | entirely to Intel Corp.'s IA/64 platform,
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I'm hardly an "expert" with NIS, but it is actually fairly flexible...
> as long as changes imposed are on its own terms. :-)
Thanks for the information. I noticed some rumblings on the srp-dev
mailing list about developing NIS support - I don't thin
I didn't see any pointers other than pilot error raised in the
recent
thread with subject line:
Subject: Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?
Perhaps those of you who're in support of the pilot error notion
could
have a look at PR 13174 and comment? The ori
>Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Kris Kennaway
>I also have prototype code which can store multiple password hashes in the
>password file, and retrieves "secondaries" in a new field in struct
>passwd. You could conceivably set it up to keep a DES password in sync
>with the SRP
I didn't see any pointers other than pilot error raised in the
recent
thread with subject line:
Subject: Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?
Perhaps those of you who're in support of the pilot error notion
could
have a look at PR 13174 and comment? The ori
I lost track of the quotes.
> > | --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
> > | key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
> > | Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
> > | entirely to Intel Corp.'s IA/64 platform, that will
The VMWare guest OS page for FreeBSD
(http://www.vmware.com/support/technotesfreebsd.html) states,
---
One caveat with all versions of FreeBSD is that there is a problem probing
for the CD-ROM device wdc1; FreeBSD sends an illegal ATAPI command to the
IDE controller and ignores the error status r
--- Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > Can you please site a reference for this, other than
> wishful
> > > thinking by the Linux camp?
> >
> > Here's one:
> >
>
http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015908,00.html
> >
> > But just ab
I don't think that this is an appropriate forum but I will put in my two
cents nonetheless. At least as of a couple of years age MIPS was the most
widely used embedded processor in the world. Thus, MIPS is in no way
dependent on IRIX. Not to mention that Linux runs on MIPS.
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > > > of XFS, without IRIX becoming
Sorry for not responding to this earlier, I missed it in my inbox.
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Nick Sayer wrote:
> > Where do you store the keys, or do you generate them dynamically? The
> > latter would take time to verify primality.
>
> If by "keys" you mean the DH generator and such, they are const
At 4:19 PM + 8/16/99, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Begging your pardon, but:
>
>
>| --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
>| key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
>| Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
>| entirely to Inte
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > > > of XFS, without IRIX becomi
> > These paragraphs are contradictory. It implies an end to MIPS.
> >
> > Nintendo 64 uses MIPS.
> >
> > It also seems a bit overzealous.
>
> No argument here. Perhaps they're just trying to float a few trial
> baloons in hopes of finding something popular/feasable.
That was my take on th
> I lost track of the quotes.
>
> > > | --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
> > > | key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
> > > | Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
> > > | entirely to Intel Corp.'s IA/64 platform
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > >
> > > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > > of XFS, without IRIX becoming GPL'ed?
> > >
> > > Given that they say they're dro
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I'm hardly an "expert" with NIS, but it is actually fairly flexible...
> as long as changes imposed are on its own terms. :-)
Thanks for the information. I noticed some rumblings on the srp-dev
mailing list about developing NIS support - I don't thi
I didn't see any pointers other than pilot error raised in the
recent
thread with subject line:
Subject: Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?
Perhaps those of you who're in support of the pilot error notion
could
have a look at PR 13174 and comment? The or
>Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I also have prototype code which can store multiple password hashes in the
>password file, and retrieves "secondaries" in a new field in struct
>passwd. You could conceivably set it up to keep a DES password in
I didn't see any pointers other than pilot error raised in the
recent
thread with subject line:
Subject: Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?
Perhaps those of you who're in support of the pilot error notion
could
have a look at PR 13174 and comment? The or
I lost track of the quotes.
> > | --- With the help of Veritas Software Corp., SGI will work to add
> > | key features of its Irix operating system to the Linux platform.
> > | Currently, Irix runs on the MIPS platform. Once SGI switches
> > | entirely to Intel Corp.'s IA/64 platform, that will
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > of XFS, without IRIX becoming GPL'ed?
> >
> > Gi
Hi folks,
I didn't see any pointers other than pilot error raised in the recent
thread with subject line:
Subject: Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?
Perhaps those of you who're in support of the pilot error notion could
have a look at PR 13174 and comment? The originator claims that his
kern
--- Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > Can you please site a reference for this, other than
> wishful
> > > thinking by the Linux camp?
> >
> > Here's one:
> >
>
http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015908,00.html
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > > > > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > > > > of XFS, without IRIX becomin
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > Has anyone mentioned to them that they will be unable to incorporate
> > changes made to the GPL'ed version of XFS back into the IRIX version
> > of XFS, without IRIX becoming GPL'ed?
>
> Given that they say they're dropping IRIX and going with Li
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
