In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred P
erlstein writes:
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Uhm, have any of you actually ever looked at src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src ?
I can't really tell if you are commenting on the diffs I provided or
if you are commmenting on the comments I have
Hi,
I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option "user" in
/etc/fstab which allows normal users to mount/umount devices.
Both programs have to be set-uid-root.
I´d like that someone reviews the patches (and includes them :).
The diffs are at
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hi folks,
What follows is a diff that presents Doug's changes (which must have
required quite a bit of effort, thanks!) in a slightly different format
which I think the grumpies here might prefer.
Specifically, case statements look more like
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 11:45:42PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You know how people can get sidetracked easily. :-) For that matter,
if chapter.sgml still has a log of why the version changed, then I
think it would be a good thing to insert the above comment in
param.h. I don't recall
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option "user" in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
vs Discussion welcome!
You can allow non-root users to mount and unmount devices if
the
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Kris Kirby wrote:
Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps
through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth
limited to 256K. I'm hoping the 3C503 is ancient enough that I can slow
it down by
Problem:
As I notized, a FreeBSD NFS-client does not unmount it's
NFS-mounts during reboot. This can cause problems on the
server if it's not BSD. At least Linux complains if there
are still nfs-mounted filesystems on the server. It also
would be a Good Thing (TM) if /var/db/mountdtab
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
Quoting JK3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option "user" in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in /etc/rc.sysctl
sysctl -w vfs.usermount=1
Maybe it's
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
# set sysctl variables early as we can
if [ -f /etc/rc.sysctl ]; then
. /etc/rc.sysctl
fi
Mind you it doesn't look like it was merged into releng_3
Could someone do this before 3.3? It's useful functionality.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Alban Hertroys wrote:
I have seen this line a lot lately. It isn't in FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE, is
it? My /usr/src/sbin/mount/mount.c says:
/*
* If the mount was successfully, and done by root, tell mountd the
* good news. Pid checks are probably
"Jay West" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The merced executes PA-RISC instructions natively. It also executes x86
instructions natively. If the chip you get doesn't do one or the other, it's
because that section has been lobotomized for marketing/contract reasons due
to where you get the chip
Quoting Chris D. Faulhaber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in
:[General discussion of VM buffer corruption deleted]
:
:Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Thor suggested adding the CACHETHEN bit back in the adaptec controller.
:
:To save anyone else the effort, this change only affects Adaptecs
:that identify as "aic7890/91" or "aic7896/97".
:
:Peter
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris Kennaway
writes:
: Could someone do this before 3.3? It's useful functionality.
As the committer of this feature, I've just sent mail to jkh asking
for permission.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option "user" in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
You can allow non-root users to mount and unmount devices if
the sysctl variable
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
: I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get
: 256kbps or so...
Speaking of which, I'll give two free to someone that commits to
writing a driver for these beasts. It would be an excellent chance
for reverse engineering
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Chris
D. Faulhaber" writes:
: Maybe it's just me, but I think you are confusing this with
: {Net|Open}BSD. /etc/rc.sysctl does not exist in FreeBSD.
rc.sysctl does too. I added it.
Excellent. That will be a nice
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:47:05PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
As the committer of this feature, I've just sent mail to jkh asking
for permission.
How does this change relate to bin/11031?
The above patches weren't written by me, but by a co-worker of
mine. It allows for a termcap-like
hi, there!
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
: I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get
: 256kbps or so...
Speaking of which, I'll give two free to someone that commits to
writing a driver for these beasts. It would be an excellent chance
for
we use hightly loaded nfsv3/udp server with 5 fbsd nfs client
all with 3.2-stable
server panics one/two time a day with:
panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
then reboot ...
another panic:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: ce4c9000
in this case server write:
syncing disks...
and hangs
In message pine.bsf.4.05.9908282023450.6392-100...@fw.wintelcom.net, Alfred P
erlstein writes:
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Uhm, have any of you actually ever looked at src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src ?
I can't really tell if you are commenting on the diffs I provided or
if you
Hi,
I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option user in
/etc/fstab which allows normal users to mount/umount devices.
Both programs have to be set-uid-root.
I´d like that someone reviews the patches (and includes them :).
The diffs are at
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hi folks,
What follows is a diff that presents Doug's changes (which must have
required quite a bit of effort, thanks!) in a slightly different format
which I think the grumpies here might prefer.
Specifically, case statements look more like
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 11:45:42PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You know how people can get sidetracked easily. :-) For that matter,
if chapter.sgml still has a log of why the version changed, then I
think it would be a good thing to insert the above comment in
param.h. I don't recall seeing
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option user in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
vs Discussion welcome!
You can allow non-root users to mount and unmount devices if
the
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Kris Kirby wrote:
Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps
through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth
limited to 256K. I'm hoping the 3C503 is ancient enough that I can slow
it down by
Problem:
As I notized, a FreeBSD NFS-client does not unmount it's
NFS-mounts during reboot. This can cause problems on the
server if it's not BSD. At least Linux complains if there
are still nfs-mounted filesystems on the server. It also
would be a Good Thing (TM) if /var/db/mountdtab
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
As I notized, a FreeBSD NFS-client does not unmount it's
NFS-mounts during reboot. This can cause problems on the
One could just made a quick and dirty solution as Linux has, like one line
in rc.shutdown:
umount -Avt nfs
As
Quoting JK3 (j...@bgl.vsnl.net.in):
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option user in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
vs Discussion welcome!
You can allow non-root
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
Quoting JK3 (j...@bgl.vsnl.net.in):
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option user in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in /etc/rc.sysctl
sysctl -w vfs.usermount=1
Maybe it's just me, but I think you are confusing this with
On 29 Aug, Chris Piazza wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in /etc/rc.sysctl
sysctl -w vfs.usermount=1
I have seen this line a lot lately.
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in /etc/rc.sysctl
sysctl -w vfs.usermount=1
Maybe it's
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
# set sysctl variables early as we can
if [ -f /etc/rc.sysctl ]; then
. /etc/rc.sysctl
fi
Mind you it doesn't look like it was merged into releng_3
Could someone do this before 3.3? It's useful functionality.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Alban Hertroys wrote:
I have seen this line a lot lately. It isn't in FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE, is
it? My /usr/src/sbin/mount/mount.c says:
/*
* If the mount was successfully, and done by root, tell mountd the
* good news. Pid checks are probably
Jay West jlw...@tseinc.com wrote:
The merced executes PA-RISC instructions natively. It also executes x86
instructions natively. If the chip you get doesn't do one or the other, it's
because that section has been lobotomized for marketing/contract reasons due
to where you get the chip from.
[General discussion of VM buffer corruption deleted]
Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
Thor suggested adding the CACHETHEN bit back in the adaptec controller.
To save anyone else the effort, this change only affects Adaptecs
that identify as aic7890/91 or aic7896/97.
Peter
To
Quoting Chris D. Faulhaber (jed...@fxp.org):
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:30:35PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Natty Rebel wrote:
This procedure can be automated by entering the following command
in /etc/rc.sysctl
:[General discussion of VM buffer corruption deleted]
:
:Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
: Thor suggested adding the CACHETHEN bit back in the adaptec controller.
:
:To save anyone else the effort, this change only affects Adaptecs
:that identify as aic7890/91 or aic7896/97.
:
Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
Oh my, did I really say Thor ? Sorry about that Tor!
Actually, no, I managed to insert that typo into Matt's quote. Sorry to
both Tor and Matt.
Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in
Wilko Bulte wrote:
As Wes Peters wrote ...
If you think Microsoft doesn't have 64-bit NT in development for Merced,
you're being awfully gullible. Compaq was insisting that Alpha remained
the development platform for NT64 while dropping support for NT32 on the
Alpha last week, while
Chuck Robey wrote:
When I was in the computer architecture classes, I did a lot of
modeling of various kinds of things that could be done to speed up a
processor (the least of which is cache memory, but it stands as a good
for instance thing here). One thing that impressed me, when doing
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
Uh, no, HP has already admitted that when Merced ships it will be slower
than current-generation PA-RISC CPUs. Which means it will also be slower
than Alpha, PowerPC, and UltraSPARC processors you can buy now.
Which is just going to make *everyone*
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908281545220.1358-100...@sasami.jurai.net Matthew
N. Dodd writes:
: On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Kris Kirby wrote:
: Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps
: through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth
: limited to 256K.
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908291829260.61952-100...@pawn.primelocation.net
Chris D. Faulhaber writes:
: Maybe it's just me, but I think you are confusing this with
: {Net|Open}BSD. /etc/rc.sysctl does not exist in FreeBSD.
rc.sysctl does too. I added it.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908291552200.47871-100...@hub.freebsd.org Kris
Kennaway writes:
: Could someone do this before 3.3? It's useful functionality.
As the committer of this feature, I've just sent mail to jkh asking
for permission.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
: I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get
: 256kbps or so...
Speaking of which, I'll give two free to someone that commits to
writing a driver for these beasts. It would be an excellent chance
for reverse engineering skills to be honed. :-) I would prefer
vs I whacked mount and umount into shape for using an option user in
[snip]
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/mount.diff
vs http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~stolz/umount.diff.
You can allow non-root users to mount and unmount devices if
the sysctl variable
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
: I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get
: 256kbps or so...
Speaking of which, I'll give two free to someone that commits to
writing a driver for these beasts. It would be an excellent chance
for reverse engineering
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908291829260.61952-100...@pawn.primelocation.net
Chris D. Faulhaber writes:
: Maybe it's just me, but I think you are confusing this with
: {Net|Open}BSD. /etc/rc.sysctl does not exist in FreeBSD.
rc.sysctl does too. I
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:47:05PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
As the committer of this feature, I've just sent mail to jkh asking
for permission.
How does this change relate to bin/11031?
The above patches weren't written by me, but by a co-worker of
mine. It allows for a termcap-like
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908300059590.1358-100...@sasami.jurai.net Matthew
N. Dodd writes:
: Of course, I'm assuming that your boards are compatible with the ARCnet
: standard programming interface...
Actually, no. They are Ethernet drivers with an underdocumented
interface.
Warner
To
In message 1999083324.a29...@tsunami.waterspout.com C. Stephen Gunn
writes:
: The above patches weren't written by me, but by a co-worker of
: mine. It allows for a termcap-like configuration file /etc/mountcap
: that allows you to specify a mountpoint/device, options, and filesystem
:
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 12:40:20 +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
if isyes ${thisvariable}
case $1 of
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
exit 0
;;
*)
exit 1
;;
esac
I hope you mean in instead of of and return instead of exit. :-)
I like this. One of the reasons I like it so much is because it will
make
hi, there!
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
: I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get
: 256kbps or so...
Speaking of which, I'll give two free to someone that commits to
writing a driver for these beasts. It would be an excellent chance
for
56 matches
Mail list logo
