On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 30-Mar-00 Jesper Skriver wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:42:42AM -0500, Patrick Gardella wrote:
> >> Lloyd Rennie wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I sent this to -questions, but have received no reply. Sorry to bug
> >> > y'all, but...
> >> >
> >> > What
Dear chessplayer!
Long time control tournament at http://www.chess.kiev.ua
Join it now and win a prize.
The First ICKT will start at Feb 10 2000 and will before
June- 10 2000. The place of competition is
http://chess.terra.ee of Internet.
Every chess players can take part of the FICKT.
Parti
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:04:34 PST, Peter Wemm wrote:
> man mailwrapper
> man mailer.conf
>
> Then see /etc/mail/mailer.conf
And for those who read the manual page and still don't want
/usr/sbin/sendmail to be blown away by mailwrapper(8), there's now a
NO_MAILWRAPPER knob.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 21:29:50 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > copies of libc in /sbin and /bin. I was thinking about building, for
> > this system only, /bin and /sbin dynamic. Has anybody ever done this?
>
> Ask Bruce. He used to have a completely dynamic system a while ago...
Bruce Evans
Lloyd,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 10:06:02AM +0100, Lloyd Rennie wrote:
> > I was about to say. On ftp3.FreeBSD.org we use 3 9 Gb SCSI disks in a
> > vinum stripe to hold just XFree86 and a partial mirror of FreeBSD and it
> > runs at about 86% capacity.
>
> Right. Thanks to all who replied - wil
[ Sigh. I had hoped to keep this to the uk mailing list, limiting the
exposure of my ignorance. Sadly I now have to expose it to the whole
world. This is on a 3.x-stable system. ]
In the course of debugging why Samba was bringing my modem link up
periodically, I discovered it was sending n
At Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:33:58 +0900,
Shigeyuki Fukushima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the present, may I add these nice compdefs to zsh-devel ports?
Sure. I put a tarball in the following site:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~knu/ports/distfiles/zsh-functions-freebsd-2000.03.31.tar.gz
so you cou
On 31-Mar-00 Mike Smith wrote:
>> Ok, I've been working on trying to build a release that can be
>> installed onto machines that have USB keyboards as well as other
>> USB foo. My current patch to src/ for this is at
>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/usb.release.patch. You can
>> use it to
On 31-Mar-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes:
>:until userconfig is moved out to the loader where it arguably
>:belongs.
>
> It should be almost trivially easy to write the userconfig in the boot
> loader now that I have my hint driver working. Al
Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I thought that 127/8 was the "local net", and that packets sent to any of
>those addresses would go via the loopback interface. That seems to be
>how Linux and Windows 98 do things (the only systems I can check this on
>at the moment). Assuming that's t
Hi folks,
The following patch to the 5.0-CURRENT sources allows the installkernel
target to install multiple kernels. Given the following in
/etc/make.conf:
KERNEL= AXL AXLOPT GENERIC
the installkernel target would install:
AXL -> /kernel
AXLOPT -> /ker
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:04:34PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Steve Ames wrote:
> >
> > I have NO_SENDMAIL= true in /etc/make.conf but sendmail got rebuilt
> > on the last makeworld anyway... this is -CURRENT from this morning
> > (3/30).
> >
> > -Steve
>
> man mailwrapper
> man mailer.conf
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:45:26PM -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:59:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Does anybody know of tools to read a Digital Unix "vdump" tape on FreeBSD?
> > > I have a number of such tapes, and would prefer to
after i have looked arround i cant find where to restrict ftp users to their
home dir only, pleas help me!
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
* sdf dsg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000331 08:33] wrote:
> after i have looked arround i cant find where to restrict ftp users to their
> home dir only, pleas help me!
5. If the user name appears in the file /etc/ftpchroot, or the
user is a member of a group with a gr
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, sdf dsg wrote:
> after i have looked arround i cant find where to restrict ftp users to their
> home dir only, pleas help me!
The man pages are always good places to start. See ftpd(8), particularly
the paragraph:
If the user name appears in the file /etc/ftp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes:
: Cool. The only extra part is reading the current config out of a loaded
: kernel. Now where did our Forth hackers go? :)
Well, this would be pretty trivial if config has hacked to have
similar hints and have those be loaded FIRST by the boot
Does anyone have any experiance or information about using HP JetDirect 500X
Printer Hubs with FreeBSD ? This is mission critical for my company, so any
information greatly appriciated.
Thank you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body o
Tony Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I thought that 127/8 was the "local net", and that
>> packets sent to any of those addresses would go via
>> the loopback interface. That seems to be how Linux
>> and Windows 98 do things (the only syst
Hello!
I have a problem where I'm trying to bootp an Alpha box. It works great
over a hub, but through a switch it fails miserably.
I tracked it down to a bad autoconfiguration. The switch is
autonegotiating 100Mb/fdx and the client is autonegotiating 100Mb/hdx.
Needless to say, this doesn
I am having a problem with ssh sessions from my windows box to my freebsd
box timing out after a number of idle minutes. SecureCRT still shows a
valid connection until I try to type some keys, and then after a minute it
says "connecton reset". I believe I have isolated the problem to the ipfw
As Larry Baird was suggesting in a private email, one way to
handle this problem would be to have the firewall issue keepalives
to refresh the state. Unfortunately the connection can be alive
without any traffic flowing, and you cannot rely on keepalives on
both sides of the connection.
On the o
> Hello!
>
> I have a problem where I'm trying to bootp an Alpha box. It works great
> over a hub, but through a switch it fails miserably.
>
> I tracked it down to a bad autoconfiguration. The switch is
> autonegotiating 100Mb/fdx and the client is autonegotiating 100Mb/hdx.
> Needless to
At 01:16 PM 3/31/00 -0600, you wrote:
>I am having a problem with ssh sessions from my windows box to my freebsd
>box timing out after a number of idle minutes. SecureCRT still shows a
>valid connection until I try to type some keys, and then after a minute it
>says "connecton reset". I belie
I seem to be crashing my system every time I attempt to open /dev/ppi0!
I get a kernel panic, and it usually explains that nexus_setup_intr is
unhappy. I traced this all down to /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/nexus.c
where it claims that somebody tried to setup an irq that failed to allocate.
I su
> I believe I may have found a solution. If I set net.inet.tcp.keepidle <
> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime, this appears to work. The defaults for
yes, though this assumes thay you can set the keepalive interval
on at least one end, and you know the lifetime of dynamic rules on
the firewall,
Doug Barton:
> > export VAR=value
> The problem with that option is that it's not portable.
It's just as portable as "set -o" and "alias". None of them are
available in the original Bourne shell, all of them in the POSIX
shell.
> > alias r='fc -s'
>
> Hrrmm... ok. I have no experience
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Doug Barton:
>
> > > export VAR=value
> > The problem with that option is that it's not portable.
>
> It's just as portable as "set -o" and "alias". None of them are
> available in the original Bourne shell, all of them in the POSIX
> shell
On Friday, March 31, 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> In my mind there is a difference between items that are
> freebsd-exclusive (like set -o and alias) and items that we have unique
> implementations of, like export. The latter are available on other
> platforms, and therefore, IMO we should fol
Ollivier Robert wrote:
>
> According to Warner Losh:
> > copies of libc in /sbin and /bin. I was thinking about building, for
> > this system only, /bin and /sbin dynamic. Has anybody ever done this?
>
> Ask Bruce. He used to have a completely dynamic system a while ago...
Whatever happened t
Doug Barton:
> In my mind there is a difference between items that are
> freebsd-exclusive (like set -o and alias) and items that we have unique
> implementations of, like export. The latter are available on other
> platforms, and therefore, IMO we should follow the more generally accepted
Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
>
> Hy folks!
>
> I have been playing with FreeBSD for the last 1 year and some time ago i
> decide to give openbsd a try.
>
> I have been loving Free! Now, playing with Open is no trouble.
> Some questions came up:
>
> 1) What are the advantages/disadavantages of usi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
: Whatever happened to the idea of putting the shared libs for /bin and
: /sbin in /lib?
People are afraid that it would mean more disk space used on /, not
less. They worry that shared libraries are not robust enough to cope
and your system will
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Friday, March 31, 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > In my mind there is a difference between items that are
> > freebsd-exclusive (like set -o and alias) and items that we have unique
> > implementations of, like export. The latter are available on o
:People are afraid that it would mean more disk space used on /, not
:less. They worry that shared libraries are not robust enough to cope
:and your system will be completely useless if one file (/lib/libc.so)
:goes away. They also worry about duplicated disk usage between
:/usr/lib/libc.so and
On Friday, March 31, 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> I guess that's not the best term to use, so let me try and
> rephrase my argument. All Bourne shells and derivatives have an export
> command. On all Bourne shells and derivatives, you _can_ do:
>
> var=foo
> export var
>
> It is not true how
At 02:33 PM 3/23/00 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>Yup. The 99.99% of all pci modems are winmodems of some flavor or
>another.
Yes, I spent a long time finding a PCI non-winmodem for my freeBSD box.
Once I plugged in all the correct information, it works just fine, looking
like
a 16550A to the OS.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian D. Moffet"
writes:
: Yes, I spent a long time finding a PCI non-winmodem for my freeBSD
: box. Once I plugged in all the correct information, it works just
: fine, looking like a 16550A to the OS. It was quite a bit more
: expensive than the winmodems that
38 matches
Mail list logo
