|
|One nice feature would also be to be able to define aliases of certain
|devices, such as cdrom, modem, etc... I suppose these could get handled
|in rc/rc.conf. Also, I really like the idea of being able to create a
|'limited' devfs mount for a chroot'd environment.
Or via a symlink.
On Sunday, July 16, 2000, Coleman Kane wrote:
This is a great idea. We need a good, well drawn out description of
what DEVFS is supposed to accomplish and how we'd like it to work. I
will be glad to help out, and perhaps we can get some movement on this.
Personally, I'd like to see DEVFS
Marc,
Do you know anyone who has tried the support of AIC-7899 chips? That
chipset is used on some quad and dual XEON boards.
-john v.e.
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Marc Veldman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Is Adaptec aic-7892 and 7899 160/m SCSI support in the pipeline
Could somebody give me suggestion? I believe many people know about this
question. But I did not recieve any reply until now. If you think my
question is not clear or can be solve by simply reading some man
page/source code, please tell me. I am a newbie here. So please do not
hesitate to give me
:I am getting strange behaviour with rfork(RFMEM) on a ~2 week old
:kernel. The following code illustrates it. For all the world, the
:stack appears to be shareable after the fork. This is clearly wrong,
:since pid was at some point different in parent and child for them
:to take the right case.
Thus spake James Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
fairings? Why does it matter what color the bikeshed is? What does
What is this thing with the bikesheds???
It appears on every place I am, on IRC, now here.
As a non-native English-speaker, I'd like to know what's up with the
poor bikesheds.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
: tes:
:
: So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only
: sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that reports either AC, nn%,
: or N/A ? Or should
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Dave
Preece (KB Group)" writes:
: Possibly off topic, but here goes.
:
: I'm trying to use placement new with gcc 2.95.2 on FBSD4.0-Release and can't
: get it to go with an error:
:
: internal:11: too many arguments to function `void * operator new(unsigned
:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Dave
Preece (KB Group)" writes:
: Panic over, #include new.h solved that. You learn something new every day.
: No pun intended.
:
: Apologies for offtopicness. 50 lines of "I will look on deja next time".
You don't need to include new.h, and you shouldn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Langer writes:
: What is this thing with the bikesheds???
Summary:
phk sent out a long message about how one can do huge things
w/o anybody complaining because they don't feel they are quailified
to. One cannot do small things without getting
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
: tes:
:
: So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only
: sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that reports either AC,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:15:18 -0700
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nsayer The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
nsayer operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
nsayer already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nick Sayer writes:
: The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
: operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
: already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.
You should already be a member of group
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: nsayer The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
: nsayer operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
: nsayer already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.
: I love this
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warner Losh writes:
: Yes. The right answer isn't to kludge this through a sysctl, but
: instead it is to fix apm to that it is safe to make it world read
: only. Is there a way inside a ioctl to see if you have something open
: for write access?
OK. I found the
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:14:24 -0600
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
imp In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
imp : nsayer The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
imp : nsayer operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
imp :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: Indeed, I wish to have a method to obtain required information without
: extra privilege. We need safety way.
: Currentry, GKrellM opens /dev/apm with O_RDWR. I just tried to open
: with O_RDONLY and see it is sufficient for APMIO_GETINFO.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:45:29 -0600
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
imp It is sufficient for APMIO_GETINFO, but it will introduce a security
imp hole as the apm ioctls aren't careful enough about their sanity
imp checking. I've added such sanity checking in my local copy of apm and
imp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: ports/sysutils/gkrellm/ :-)
ah. ok. I feel dumb now... :-)
thank you umemoto-san.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
newsfeed-inn2# Jul 17 10:14:07 newsfeed-inn2
/kernel: pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing
PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
Don't see this one in LINT.
Anybody have any wild guesses as to good values?
newsfeed-inn2# sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.ipc.shmmax: 4194304
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
I am writing a KLD that gives me kernel fault each time I run 'ps' command
after 'make unload'. The KLD has a system call to create several kernel
threads by calling kthread_create(). During unload, I set flags to each
threads so that they will call exit1() upon wakeup (sleep on a timeout).
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Langer writ
es:
Thus spake James Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
fairings? Why does it matter what color the bikeshed is? What does
What is this thing with the bikesheds???
It appears on every place I am, on IRC, now here.
As a non-native
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 07:52:01PM +0200, Gergely EGERVARY wrote:
hello all,
I have to set up a box able to run 5000 processes. I have the hardware
for it (i386 architecture, lots of RAM, lots of CPU power)
I'm playing with VM parameters, tuning everything possible, but can't get
more
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wri
tes:
So what does everyone think? Is
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
: tes:
:
: So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only
: sysctl
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: well. as you said before, you just want a read-only sysctl. if the driver is not
: secure. it's not my fault. it shouldn't be so complicated to secure it.
: do you now if the permissions sets using make_dev() in i386/apm/apm.h are
: used at a
26 matches
Mail list logo
