Mark Newton writes:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:05:39PM +, Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
I'm trying to run a SCO SVR4 executable on FreeBSD but I get a SIGSYS
(invalid system call) at the very beginning. Here is the kdump:
Which call is it about? I see an "old.lstat" but I
Hi.
Am I right for the following:
When a process is blocked on semop (trying to get resource) and receives
a signal (for which the process has a handler), the process gets unblocked
from the semop wait (to handle the signal), and after handling the signal
continues with the instruction after
Hi,
Is it possible to hide the (text) cursor when using syscons? There is no
vi attribute defined for the cons25 termcap record...is this an oversite
or is it not possible?
Thanks,
Andrew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the
Hi,
easy:
---
extern int errno;
int sem_lock(int semnumb)
{
struct sembuf sb[2];
sb[0].sem_num = semnumb;
sb[0].sem_op = -1;
sb[0].sem_flg = 0;
again:
if( semop(sh-sem, sb,1) )
{
errmsg("Semaphore %d erorr: %s\n",sh-sem, strerror(errno));
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:31:06PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
if I understand correctly nsswitch patches implement getxxx_r functions as
well
Yes, but they have to live `on top of' the existing resolver. :-(
--
Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Hey all --
I'm trying to find a "correct" way to add virtual interfaces to my network
card via a C program. right now, I've come up with 3 system() calls to do the
work. I don't know if there is a better way or not, but if there is, I'd like
to use it. Is there a better way to create and make
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 09:29:02AM -0600, Mark wrote:
Hey all --
I'm trying to find a "correct" way to add virtual interfaces to my network
card via a C program. right now, I've come up with 3 system() calls to do the
work. I don't know if there is a better way or not, but if there is,
Followups to -emulation, please
In the last episode (Nov 21), Walter C. Pelissero said:
Dan Nelson writes:
In the last episode (Nov 20), Walter C. Pelissero said:
I'm trying to run a SCO SVR4 executable on FreeBSD but I get a
SIGSYS (invalid system call) at the very beginning. Here is
Thus spake Peter Pentchev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 09:29:02AM -0600, Mark wrote:
Hey all --
I'm trying to find a "correct" way to add virtual interfaces to my network
card via a C program. right now, I've come up with 3 system() calls to do the
work. I don't
In the last episode (Nov 21), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
Is it possible to hide the (text) cursor when using syscons? There is
no vi attribute defined for the cons25 termcap record...is this an
oversite or is it not possible?
You can cheat by setting the cursor shape to an invalid one,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:05:33AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 21), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
Is it possible to hide the (text) cursor when using syscons? There is
no vi attribute defined for the cons25 termcap record...is this an
oversite or is it not
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 09:10:13PM +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote:
As said before, I've not got this code working, when the sysctl
'net.inet.tcp.icmp_admin_prohib_like_rst' is set to 1, we'll treat a
ICMP administratively prohibited (icmp type 3 code 9, 10 and 13) as if
we recived a TCP RST, but
Hi,
I was reading that interesting article that some posted on the list of an
implementaion of Scheduler Activations for an old version of BSDI. The
article mentions that it was based of BSDI's sfork() call. This call is
referenced in our syscalls.master but it's not implemented and the BSDI
At 12:19 PM +0200 11/20/00, Robert Nordier wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
[...] The basic problem is some code which does:
(void)fclose(pfp);
if (ferror(pfp)) {
...do stuff...
}
I find it surprising that the above works under FreeBSD.
[...]
Bear
"Pedro F. Giffuni" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone knowledgeable comment on what it does, and maybe if it could
(or should) be brought into FreeBSD ?
Perhaps you are looking for rfork()? AFAIK Irix calls rfork() sfork().
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It might be..
rfork comes from plan 9 and along with sfork it wasn't part of the
4.4BSDlite 2 release, OTOH if both are the same, why aren't we referencing
it in our syscalls for compatibility with BSDI ?
I can't find a reference to sfork elsewhere, but anyone with BSD/OS 2.x
or later should
Roman Shterenzon wrote:
Hi,
Once, someone told me that he had a patch for truss that allows it to
follow children, just like in Solaris (or strace -f in linux).
Does anyone have it?
Why don't you use the native ktrace/kdump commands instead ?
"ktrace -d" does follow the children. I
For reasons beyond my control, I'm stuck using FreeBSD in a real time
system and am violating my timing constraints when too many SCSI commands
complete in a short time frame and starve one of my userland real time
processes.
If the interrupt handler wokeup a kernel thread running at a lower
I hope someone can help me with this issue..
When the application recieves a SIGPIPE the thread hangs hard.. What is the
correct thing to do when a socket is closed by the remote end ??
The fault happens each time I'll hit reload in my browser while there's
still a connection open (while
You should have the thread call signal() to ignor the
sigpipe signal so the thread won't hang.
==
WWW.XGFORCE.COM
The Next Generation Load Balance and
Fail Safe Server Clustering Software
for the Internet.
==
-
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
I hope someone can help me with this issue..
When the application recieves a SIGPIPE the thread hangs hard.. What is the
correct thing to do when a socket is closed by the remote end ??
When application receives SIGPIPE the correct thing to do is
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 05:54:06AM +, Tony Finch wrote:
I'm looking up the IP addresses with up to 1500 or so processes each
taking a list of addresses and running gethostbyaddr() on them.
That's stupid. Use adns instead.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ian/adns/
That's stupid, use
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:27:06PM -0500, Pedro F Giffuni wrote:
rfork comes from plan 9 and along with sfork it wasn't part of the
4.4BSDlite 2 release, OTOH if both are the same, why aren't we referencing
it in our syscalls for compatibility with BSDI ?
I can't find a reference to sfork
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
The "single Unix spec" says:
After the call to fclose(), any use of stream causes
undefined behavior.
FreeBSD's own man page for fclose says:
[fclose returns 0 or EOF]. In either case, no further
access to the stream is possible.
"Daniel O'Connor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 20-Nov-00 Brian Reichert wrote:
I didn't find anything after an admittedly quick look intp PRs and the mail
list archives:
Under FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE, we are running a simple log file scrubber:
15 3 * * * find
At 2:11 PM +0900 11/22/00, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
The "single Unix spec" says:
After the call to fclose(), any use of stream causes
undefined behavior.
FreeBSD's own man page for fclose says:
[fclose returns 0 or EOF]. In either case, no
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Undefined behavior means anything goes. On a standard, it means the
behaviour is implementation-defined (which may be undefined or not).
But if "anything goes", then that you can not expect it to
work; certainly not when porting to other platforms.
Sure enough.
27 matches
Mail list logo
