Hi, is someone working actively on new i2c-stuff?
I´d be interested in talking to someone who could take a short peek at
http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/info.html, a Linux-site providing
i2c-drivers to various things, and could comment on the feasibility of
using their stuff to implement
SSH - are you nuts!?!
by Jesus Monroy, Jr.
I'm too tired to get this out, but i promised it would
be available, so here it is.
The Offical Part
On Jan. 4, 2001, a talk entitled "ssh - are you nuts!?!"
will be given at the SVBUG
Hi all
I'm running FreeBSD 4.2-S on a Compaq Presario laptop. This laptop seems
to have APM support (at least it does under MS-Windows), but FreeBSD
doesn't recognise it as such. I've gone so far as to add additional log
messages in the kernel probes for the APM BIOS, and these log that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:- Devices include video-devices like TV-Out on the Voodoo3 which could
:- seemingly be enabled using i2c.
And, I think, Meade telescopes...
--
Robert Withrow -- (+1 978 288 8256)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
Warner Losh wrote:
OK. I have a disk drive that is failing in random ways. Today blocks
123 456 and 293 might be unreadable. Tomorrow, it might be these and
27 or it might just be 27. It is an IDE drive. I was wondering if anybody
had a program that would read the entire disk and keep a
Hi all,
I want to allocate an IRQ for a PCI device driver. Normally this is easy
enough, since the BIOS would reserve it for me, then I would just have to
bus_alloc_resource and not even care which IRQ line it's using.
Thing is, here the BIOS hasn't allocated an IRQ, so I'll need to
hi there,
after asking this in questions for a while, i want to give hackers a try.
is there a possibility to make a release with a custom kernel?
i know how to create a release but it contains always the GENERIC kernel.
thanks
sven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
I'm writing a console app, which needs to be quite colorful, and to use
customizable colors. Unfortunately, with ncurses, right after start_color(),
I get a can_change_color() == FALSE. Besides, COLORS is defined to as many
as the Co termcap capability, which is 8.
Well, all (well, most
Are threads on FreeBSD 4.x implemented at the
kernel level?
If so, since when (I remember 2.x used MIT-threads,
so I'm guessing at least since 3.x)?
How can I see for myself that threads are really
implemented at the kernel level? I looked around
in /usr/src/sys/kern, but couldn't find
Are threads on FreeBSD 4.x implemented at the
kernel level?
No, as far as I know, those are coming in FreeBSD 5.0 (which won't be out
for a while)
If so, since when (I remember 2.x used MIT-threads,
so I'm guessing at least since 3.x)?
How can I see for myself that threads are really
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Rafael Barrero wrote:
Hi all,
Two questions:
0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD?
Yes.
1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no?
No. The linux compatbility is through the image activator. The syscalls
have to be translated,
On 04-Jan-01 Marc Tardif wrote:
Are threads on FreeBSD 4.x implemented at the
kernel level?
No, they probably will not be until 6.0.
If so, since when (I remember 2.x used MIT-threads,
so I'm guessing at least since 3.x)?
How can I see for myself that threads are really
implemented at
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Wheeler writes:
: Hi all
:
: I'm running FreeBSD 4.2-S on a Compaq Presario laptop. This laptop seems
: to have APM support (at least it does under MS-Windows), but FreeBSD
: doesn't recognise it as such. I've gone so far as to add additional log
: messages in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Matthew
C. Forman" writes:
: Thing is, here the BIOS hasn't allocated an IRQ, so I'll need to
: bus_set_resource in my probe to get one. To complicate matters, the
: device's interrupt generator is pretty flexible, and can generate an
: interrupt on (almost) any IRQ
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Russell L. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bingo!
Thanks guys!
Not so fast there, fella. You're not getting off that easily. ;-)
Could you please try the patch below? It is like the patch that Paul
sent, except it should handle error conditions better.
This
If I run the following program, I get the following results:
---
jello:/usr/home/chris/foo$ cat blah.c
#include stdio.h
int main() {
FILE *f = fopen("foo", "a+");
char x[50] = " ";
char y[50] = " ";
fseek(f, 0, SEEK_SET);
printf("tell:
ecureuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
Hello.
I'm trying to get interfaces' list and infos with getifaddrs().
The ifa_data struct should contain all needed information, but
this is a NULL pointer for IPv4 interfaces. Why ?
What you are printing is the link level address and the v4 address
* Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010104 16:51] wrote:
If I run the following program, I get the following results:
[snip]
I wish you would have summarized that better...
It tells me I'm at 3, but my read acts as if I'm at the end of the file, and
then after trying to read it tells me
%In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
%Russell L. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% Bingo!
%
% Thanks guys!
%
%Not so fast there, fella. You're not getting off that easily. ;-)
%Could you please try the patch below? It is like the patch that Paul
%sent, except it should handle error conditions
%Could you please try the patch below? It is like the patch that Paul
%sent, except it should handle error conditions better.
%
%This patch is against -current, but I think it will apply cleanly to
%-stable too.
My pleasure. This patch applies cleanly against a two day old
-stable, and
This machine is an Intel Pentium Pro based system, (not a DEC Alpha), it
currently has one 200mhz 512K CPU, 196megs RAM, (4 x 32edo simms, 4 x
16edo simms), and two 4.5Gig SCSI disks in hot-swappable drive carriages
configured using RAID 1 (mirrored), attached to a Mylex DAC960P/PD
1.3.3. The FreeBSD Development Model
Contributed by Satoshi Asami [EMAIL PROTECTED].
The development of FreeBSD is a very open and flexible process,
FreeBSD being literally built from the
contributions of hundreds of people around the world, as can be
seen from our list of contributors. We
are
This is a FAQ; you have a geometry mismatch.
Make sure the BIOS on the card is set for 2GB mode, make sure sysinstall
detects a */128/32 geometry. 8GB mode doesn't work (my fault, will be
fixed once I get my lab set up and some free time).
I can add another data point for this. We are
I want to allocate an IRQ for a PCI device driver. Normally this is easy
enough, since the BIOS would reserve it for me, then I would just have to
bus_alloc_resource and not even care which IRQ line it's using.
This is how it works in -current.
Thing is, here the BIOS hasn't allocated an
Warner Losh wrote:
APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
all you need to do is enable it.
Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe
and they log a failure (I
Yeah, I thought that APM was APM, but the apm device does nothing
on my desktop with power management hardware... That is, things like
'shutdown -p now' don't work, both 'apm' and 'apmd' just return
'device not configured', etc. Interestingly, at least 'shutdown -p'
does work with ACPI anyway
Warner Losh wrote:
APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
all you need to do is enable it.
Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe
and they log a
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:48:48AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
Warner Losh wrote:
APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
all you need to do is enable it.
Nope - as I said, I
Mike Smith wrote:
How new is this laptop? It may be ACPI-only.
I believe it is quite new ("designed for Windows Me").
I have to admit my ignorance - I've never heard of ACPI.
--
Dr Graham WheelerE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director, Research and Development
Mike Smith wrote:
How new is this laptop? It may be ACPI-only.
I believe it is quite new ("designed for Windows Me").
It's probably ACPI-only; welcome to FreeBSD-current. 8)
I have to admit my ignorance - I've never heard of ACPI.
ACPI is the successor to APM, as well as trying to
30 matches
Mail list logo
