On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> This is fairly easy to do. You can use SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF
> socket opts to adjust the tcp buffer space. You can make the default
> small and receive-centric and when you think you've got a good
> connection you can pump it up.
>
>
:
:On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
:
:> to handle more then 250 requests/sec. With the connection load you
:> want to handle, the chance of the data being cacheable in ram is
:> fairly low. So a disk-based caching proxy will drop connection
:> performance by two orders
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> to handle more then 250 requests/sec. With the connection load you
> want to handle, the chance of the data being cacheable in ram is
> fairly low. So a disk-based caching proxy will drop connection
> performance by two orders of magnit
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam)
> Date: Tue 19 Jun, 2001
> Subject: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
> An article over on www.Kuro5hin.org by a someone who claims
> to be a former MS employee describes the stack used in NT back
> in the early 90's as code which was
I don't think this kind of invective is appropriate for the
freebsd-hackers list. Perhaps you should confine your sentiments to
less public venues.
- Jordan
From: "Jeffrey M. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone see todays Wall Street Journal article: Microsoft Using Free
Software (or
stop being bastards. heh. i don't give a rat's ass about
any of this. it just makes me mad/laugh that people are
dumb enough to buy into that .net/hotmail/subscription
based bullshit and other stuff. if you use it, i really
don't care. in fact, M$ has been swell about helping the
economy and
From: "Jeremiah Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Anyone see todays Wall Street Journal article: Microsoft Using Free
Software (or something to that effect)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:03:46 +1000
> That's the BSD license for ya.
>
> There needs to be a license that says something to the
* Jeffrey M. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010619 19:01] wrote:
> On Monday 18 June 2001 18:45, Hal Snyder wrote:
> > FYA.
> >
> > Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft
> > Windows® 2000 Technical Case Study
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp
> >.asp
>
That's the BSD license for ya.
There needs to be a license that says something to the effect of "Anyone
can use/buy/sell/modify/distribute this software with or without source
code except Microsoft."
jeremiah();
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beh
On Monday 18 June 2001 18:45, Hal Snyder wrote:
> FYA.
>
> Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft
> Windows® 2000 Technical Case Study
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp
>.asp
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd
FYA.
Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/hotapp.asp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
An article over on www.Kuro5hin.org by a someone who claims
to be a former MS employee describes the stack used in NT back
in the early 90's as code which was liscensed from a company
called 'Spider'. In the comp.unix.admin archives I found a post
which references Spider QNIX as a *nix variant so
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:05:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Use of zalloci() permits allocations to occur at interrupt,
> such as allocations for replacement mbuf's in receive rings.
>
> It would be very difficult to maintain FreeBSD's GigaBit
> ethernet performance without this type of thi
Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:14:14PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> >[ .. ] but all this benchmark proves (in regards to the TCP
> > results) is that FreeBSD puts its foot down earlier then
> > other OS's in regards to how much it is willing to dedicate
> > to the network. In
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> > This is old. The guys running the tests blew it in so many ways
> > that you might as well have just rolled some dice. There's a slashdot
> > article on it too, and quite a few of the reader comments on these
> >
Hello,
while porting a software to FreeBSD, I came across a problem with
pthread_attr_setscope(3). The software sets PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM
attribute. From the pthread_attr_setscope(3) implementation file, a
comment says that this attribute is unsupported (though the code doesn't
show that). Me
I've encountered a problem in the interaction betwen signals, longjmp and
pthreads; I'm hoping someone can help me make sense of it.
I've been trying to implement a IsBadReadPtr-style function in FreeBSD by
using signal handlers and longjmp/setjmp. It seemed to work as expected,
until I started u
Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> In the last episode (Jun 15), Jordan Hubbard said:
> > Thanks, that represents the first "hard hit" I've seen yet:
> >
> > root@winston-> strings FTP.EXE |grep "University of California"
> > @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
>
> But this p
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> I've had several marketing types approach me recently for details as
> to whether or not Microsoft was using the BSD TCP/IP stack and/or user
> utilities, and though it's always been "common knowledge" in the
> community that they were, when I set about to "prove" it I f
:Well, we are building a web accelerator box called WebEnhance, that would
:support around a million TCP/IP connections (brag .. brag..). It would
:selectively function as a Layer 2/4/7 switch. And its going to run a
:kernel proxy, and probably nothing significant in user mode. It might be
:diskl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton writes:
: [Prelude, Warner and I discussed this off line... ]
Yea. I'm getting too grumpy for reasons that are outside the list.
Doug is aware of my concerns, and I'm sure he'll take them into
account as he moves forward.
: > Of course, I'd have to
: >
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:06PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Josef Karthauser wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:16:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > is BSDI's stack so superior to any of the other BSDs that MS would pay BSDI
> > > for it, particularly at a time when BSDI was
Hi,
while trying to get xine 0.5 (xine.sf.net) to work on freebsd I ran into
this problem:
Thread has returned from sigreturn or longjmp
after some debugging I found that disabling this part of the MMX-detection
code:
asm ("pushfl\n\t"
"popl %0\n\t"
"movl %0,%1\n\t"
Dear James,
>
> > I had a mergemaster problem a while back, but I haven't debugged it
> > properly. I had my /etc/ppp symlinked into /home/root/ppp.
> Then, after a
> > mergemaster run I ended up with a file named /etc/ppp, which had the
> > contents of the new version of /etc/ppp/ppp.conf.
>
>
If you have a freebsd boot cdrom or floppy lying around,
your best bet is to boot into "fixit" mode, and mount the
drive read-write containing your /etc directory.
Use vi or similar to edit /etc/ttys and reboot into single
user mode.
Hope that helps.
Jamie
> Hi...
> I prevent booting FreeBSD
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> Don't worry about the MMU. Tests have shown that while 4MB pages are
> nice, the performance boost is relatively minor. The kernel maps itself
> using 4MB pages but normal 4K pte's are used for kernel allocations.
>
> What you are doin
26 matches
Mail list logo
