- Original Message -
From: Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: lucky.freebsd.hackers
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Status of dialog(1) and libdialog.
> I suppose that depends on how you define "future." Do we want to
> be using libdialog in the year 2
Hello,
Some time ago I was asking about I/O in kernel mode when I don't have
struct proc to use syscalls. Actually I just wanted my kld to read it's
config file on load. Terry told me it's tricky, and I was thinking
about possible workarounds. I decided to try the following: look for
some process
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:51:22PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago I was asking about I/O in kernel mode when I don't have
> struct proc to use syscalls. Actually I just wanted my kld to read it's
> config file on load. Terry told me it's tricky, and I was thinking
> ab
One of our testers has a boot problem with FreeBSD 4.3. He installed the OS
on a onboard SCSI drive. After installing the FreeBSD driver of our ICP
controllers and inserting a ICP card with one disk attached, the system has
a boot problem. FreeBSD cannot mount the root file system (I think because
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:42:41 +0100
> From: "Leubner, Achim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> One of our testers has a boot problem with FreeBSD 4.3. He installed
> the OS on a onboard SCSI drive. After installing the FreeBSD driver
> of our ICP controllers and inserting a ICP card with one disk
> att
From: "Andrey Simonenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Status of dialog(1) and libdialog.
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:32:59 +0400
> I don't mean this at all, I just wanted to know if somebody
> improve/patch/develop libdialog, or if somebody is going
> to remove and add another compatible library
I finally got around to trying the patch on -stable; I can confirm that it solves the
problem. Thanks again!
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Eischen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Louis-Philippe Gagnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June
> >
> >I just upgraded one of my boxes to FreeBSD 4.3-stable with
> >cvsup. Unfortunately the machine now freezes.
>
> If you are tracking -stable, then there is a lot of good reason
> to keep an eye the freebsd-stable mailing list. Particularly
> when something like this comes up.
>
*blush* I'v
Hi All,
Can I set up my NIS Server to serve both FreeBSD and Linux clients ??
Thanks in advance,
Marcelo Pereira
Math. - Unicamp [Brazil]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> You are mmaping into the address space for the process you use the
> struct proc from.
> As long as it's this programm that is curproc everything is fine.
> That means you are called from that process such in kldload or
> interrupted
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:21:14AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:47:49AM +, E.B. Dreger scribbled:
> > | 1. Is AIO SMP-safe?
> >
> > AIO is not safe, SMP or not.
>
> Are you maybe confusion AIO (a POSIX mandated API) with
> async mo
> I'm working on some patches for dialog(1) and libdialog.
> Does FreeBSD team want to continue use of dialog(1) program
> and libdialog in future? I ask this question because I fix
> some problems I have with dialog(1) (really with libdialog) and
> I'm going to try to fix the same problems with a
Julian Elischer writes:
> Nicolai Petri wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > I've used some time writing a custom natd like daemon which makes som
> > speciel packet processing.
> > One of the issues with the natd approach is the large amount of
> > context-switches it gives.
> > This can
you are correct. I had forgotten about that..
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > Nicolai Petri wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi hackers,
> > >
> > > I've used some time writing a custom natd like daemon which makes som
> > > speciel packet processing
I just discovered an interesting bug in HARP that prevents SVCs
from working on a Xylan switch, and maybe others. The PR is
kern/28748, and it includes a detailed description of the
problem and a simple patch.
Any takers?
Thanks,
-Richard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
Nay, enough!
You know, when I requested an article review here several months ago,
I was impressed that I got almost fifty responses.
"So," I think, "how many people could possibly want to review a book?"
In about forty-eight hours, that comes to about 170 people.
I want to publically thank ev
On 2001-07-05, Michael Lucas scribbled:
# I want to publically thank everyone who volunteered. Responses came
# from committers, technical editors from other companies, people I've
# seen on -hackers for years, and countless folks who must just read
# -hackers in hope of achieving enlightenment.
Hello all!
I have PC with dual head video card (Matrox G450) which supports to
use both heads independently. I can attach to it two monitors or
monitor and tv. Also I can attach two mice(ps/2 and serial) and
two keyboards(ps/2 and usb).
How I can use all that as two terminals in FreeBSD 4.2?
I m
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> If WindRiver gets on the ball and keeps fulfilling CD orders, why then this
> name might continue to be worth something. Otherwise, it will go away and
> the FreeBSD CD distributions will simply take place through other
> distributors.
Or not, if every other distrib
Rayson Ho wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have written some code in C++. However, I want to run it on an old
> mainframe machine, which a C++ compiler is not available.
>
> I know that the old g++ is a C++ to C compiler. Does anyone know which
> version it is?
1.x was a C++ to C compiler. Good luck, it
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:55:25AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
> For very good reason, Jordan is no longer in a position to do this. We
> as the FreeBSD community need to decide what we're going to do about
> this, and we need to decide before another disastrous release cycle
> happens. WRS does n
Marc wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 07/03/2001 11:57:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > > Now try to imagine a whole PC on a smaller board than a PIII CPU
> > > > cartridge. If you can't, get a copy of the Embedd
22 matches
Mail list logo